RE: London buyers28 Dec 2022 14:13
RNS 25 June 2019:
"From the XRD results, spodumene represents greater than 91% and up to 98% of the available lithium within all pegmatite types tested, with trace lepidolite, petalite, eucryptite, amblygonite, triphylite and other secondary lithium-phosphate phases."
Trace.
Proactive same day:
"In addition, the analysis showed very low level to trace amounts of undesirable petalite, eucryptite, lepidolite and amblygonite."
https://www.proactiveinvestors.com/companies/news/222737/ironridge-resources-reveals-positive-testwork-on-ewoyaa-lithium-project-222737.html
PFS RNS 22 Sept just:
"The mineralisation at Ewoyaa has been confirmed to be associated with spodumene bearing pegmatite as the main lithium bearing mineral. No significant petalite or lepidolite has been observed. The deposits show good continuity of the main mineralised units which provided for drill hole intersections to be modelled into coherent, geologically robust domains. Consistency is evident in the thickness of the structure, and the distribution of grade appears to be reasonable along and across strike."
No significant.
So Goolang are you mature enough to accept you are spreading lies about the pegmatite deposit at Ewoyaa and stop or are you going to remain as the lieing child on this forum?
We await your comment.