RE: Cavendish view30 Sep 2025 11:37
stas, you just read my post, so there's someone. and i note you are still clinging to your wet blanket that i'm a trader. i explained how i got my holding to the board, and how i've averaged down on every 'promise' made by calamity baay to get to my current holding and average. i also averaged down prior to the most recent f@ck up, and guess what - i told you guys, like i have every time, because i don't believe in talking ****e. as a consequence, i hate calamity baay and every incompetent shyster like him who cons investors out of their money and doesn't do their f@cking job. you simply don't like hearing the truth, or my opinions, because it hurts to face them. natural reaction for most, like johno who doesn't want to accept he may not get his £500k investment back, let alone a profit, for years. tell me, have you averaged down? of course you have. but you'll say that i'm 'not ****bagging the company.' i say that i'm highlighting the reasons why everyone has lost money and had to average down, time and again, for years now. i'd rather not be averaging down and instead averaging up, but sadly we have a lying charlatan in charge.
matt,
1. you are talking about a company that cannot execute on time, budget or forecast, has a long history of failures and broken promises, wasted resources, a ceo who lies as he breathes, and a debt pile comfortably in excess of its mcap. so when you talk of mcap, don't. talk about ev instead. and then remember all those other things weighing on the sp, which makes £100m mcap in 12 months absolutely absurd.
2. i didn't say the bod would let the covenants get called in. i said that failure with casc 4 & 5 could result in the bank insisting on another raise, as you have pointed out. that's one of the many things weighing on the share price, and easily the biggest imo. let's use your example of 10p, well that's more than 20% shares being issued (again), to meet a covenant we knew nothing about. the excess shares issued versus 20.5p is immense. and remember, lyin paul not only didn't tell us about the covenant, he also didn't tell us that it was for more than the 20.5p raise money. this is after he said we wouldn't need to raise. but in the background, he had agreed to more than one raise with the bank. see the lies and deceit at play here.
3. their track record of exploiting hydrocarbons is shockingly poor. this is why i have been saying to the rampers to stop talking about central like it's already a huge success. in the same way as i was saying about casc 4. it's an area that shell hasn't looked at, even though they had excess capacity. that says something, whether the optimists like it or not. but to be counting on us hitting gas and breaking into lng given what has transpired over the years, is laughable.
4. finally, you are saying that i have unrealistic expectations. that's funny, because my expectations are based on actuals and their track record of under-delivery, and not more promises.