Member Info for fulmar29

When you don't have a case best not to sSng

When you don't pay your bills, best not to Sing

When you are just a chancer best not to Sing

When your friends are criminals ,best not to Sing

When you claim benefits illegally ,best not to sing

You never know who is watching you sing

There's no chance of this song making $17m either

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ5C8qYlavE

Check her out on X https://twitter.com/paola_rojas

Ella/Alby also seems to be firmly in the sights of FB on ADVFN.I can't work out why he would take aim at such a lovely individual. It's not like she trolled relentlessly ever since we bought Virgo is it- ,and it's not like (because we upset her master (who was busy with illegal activity that got him removed from his "day job")and it's not like she now carries on like nothing matters-Hang on ! Yes it's all of the above ! A loathsome individual, hell bent on our destruction-many will never forget and many will never forgive- "Lest we forget"

1.https://youtu.be/c_ugjmpiq50

2.https://t.co/MbW3x4L4BX

3.https://twitter.com/i/status/1699764486435983474

4.Ruffles@ruffles80·Oct 6

Anglo & NvS in Zambia 🇿🇲

High level government meetings taking place now.

Wrapping things up 🎁🤞🍀

WTS🥂#ARCM👍

P.S. It's not cryptic !

The 2.25 was $ but as you say it matters sod all for the moment and the sp will be sentiment driven as drills appear like GGP /Solg whose deals were nothing like ours

So calling it 400m for simplicity and Arc share of total Unico eventually at 20% is obviously total value of Unico assets would be $2.25b ish (well within scope) and that is excluding any other Arc assets

Not following your maths Richi-30p would be roughly 10x Arc pres sp, so (in simple terms) 10x pres Mcap =£400m allowing for some dilution, apart from the obvious ("a screw lose") what am I missing ?

A strange admission from me, but-Piggy is quite right-"This truly is a great achievement, over 3p and last week it was over 3p great news that". We are only back to where we were before recent manipulations and the real rise hasn't even started yet and yes I know Piggy will be

" tickled pink" to see the news land -It is likely to build momentum up to the JV news but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cia_v4vxfE

I don't think Oyster knows what day it is, let alone a buy in price -he's a "Bumi Bitter Boy" he wouldn't buy here in a million years !

It turns out that the claimant is a penniless shell company that can't pay the court fee( £10k) and wrongly sought exemption as he is on benefits. You couldn't make ut up !

He is also trying to claim damages from an insolvent company, Zamsort( nothing to do with Arc)that won't be able to finance a defence either.....!

Tomorrow is a "Summary Judgment being the process for dealing with claims that are without any merit on a truncated basis" As I said earlier there is no judgement tomorrow and it affects Arc "not a jot".

His chances of getting a penny from Zamsort are Zero and your soppy inference that it could involve any payment from Arc, there is even less chance than that !

Ho Hum, on to the next wild story.

Not at all,I 'm interested in your implication that it is relevant .You must do in order to post it here But you seem to be unwilling to confirm your views, I really can't understand why.

I can't comment on an irrelevant posting

So why post something on and Arc BB if it has nothing to do with us unless you think it has ?

Why on earth would you not be brave enough to say why you posted a court list on here ? What was the point ?

So that's Piggies out then .because he said "there will be no point in posting if the deal is signed" got it !

"My one bright hope is that the 3 Anglo nominees for the JV have some nous, will wrest control from Schirnding, and pull the whole thing together." They won't need to "wrest control" as we will effectively be a minor partner and my guess is after the last few years he will be more than happy for them to lead the dance and be there when called on

It's all covered by IPs and Patents (ours and our partners) as George has previously stated-If REE had an ounce of nouse he would realize that often IP and/or patents can be worth fortunes and are rarely built into Mcaps until a sale or T/O. So why T F would they disclose the details to satisfy some unctuous little naysayer ? get a life pal !

@Monarch,I unfiltered him because of your question re the video. I'm glad I did, that video explains exactly why RBW and any others that manage to get into production in the West are invaluable to the US and EU and will be supported and protected maybe even controlled, but that involves a massive hike in our sp. I never thought I'd say this but thanks REE for supplying a compelling investment case, and back on the naughty filter step you go unless of course you have any more gems ?

So Phal Gypsum sales= Zero Opex (previously not accounted for) and if other markets for the gypsum open up ....! i.e cheap building materials for Africa-another win.

E. G. "What are the advantages of gypsum block walls?

Light Weighted. Gypsum is a light-weighted material that weighs less than half of the weight of cement, making AUGREEN Block Wall System easier to be transported. ...

Space Saver. ...

Tough and Strong. ...

Sound Insulation. ...

Fire Resistance. ...

Quick Installation. ...

Environmental-Friendly. ...

Load-bearing."

Cont 2...As quoted:

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that TRESPHORED M. KABANGA, BE and IS hereby appointed to act as Provisional Liquidator in respect of all the assets, properties and business of the Respondent in the Winding Up proceedings of the Respondent herein with all the powers of the provisional liquidator as enshrined in the Corporate Insolvency Act No. 9 of 2017.”

ES is now going after the original shareholdings at the time, (point [4]). This new case has nothing to do with Arc!

In conclusion:

The Zamsort liquidation is as a result of a historical claim with the owner of Zamsort MM) and has no relevance to Arc minerals and it's partners or associates.

Ownership of the licences has been formally accepted by the High Court through the consent agreements as per 16th March 2022 RNS.

MM reacting predictably to having his company dissolved and losing an asset he fought so hard to get!

FB.

Cont.... Fast forward to 2023 and 19906 is now classed as Handa (keep this in mind!) Just to recap:

- Point [4]. Is not in dispute between MM and ES.

- The contention comes during point [10]. Licence number 8248-HQ-SML and the prospecting licence number 19906 HQ-LPL (together called the "target assets")

------

Laymans terms:

- MM, arguing the agreement was based on a "20%" finder's fee* and solely based on his (MMs) original Zamsort shareholdings on 8248.

- ES, arguing the agreement was "sum +20%" for both 8248 & 19906.

Cash terms "to be added to the then outstanding debt of K100,000.00".

*Finder’s fee. ES did find that new investor - it was Ortac!

-----

Arguments are presented from both parties all the way to point [18]

Points [19] to [27]. Are all related to the consideration of the matter by the High Court.

ORTAC is mentioned during points 6, 8, 9, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 64, 65, 85, 86 and 108. On all points "Ortac" is seen as a 3rd party entity during the case. Ex dates ran beyond 180 days (March to September of 2015).

Hopefully everyone will have a better understanding of 'who is Edward Sefuke!"

As implied during Dropbox 2 (DB2) over on LSE (posts now removed):

Edward Sefuke Puts Zamsort into Provisional Liquidation = True

When the court grants that Order then Edward’s Provisional Liquidator will receive all the proceeds from the Anglo transaction = False and libellous!

What is disturbing is NVS and Mushy's lawyers both neglected to attend court last year when the matter came up. The question is why was ARCM so negligent? = The case has nothing to do with Arc.

The mention of Liquidation originated from Smith, however the DB link was supplied by another poster "Zack" to substantiate the claim!

Within the DB link contained 2 items:

1) Post link 8391… this doc was also used by MM&Co during DB1.

2) Twitter link courtesy of Rousey.

https://twitter.com/Rousey59/status/1708927976706875838

ORTAC/ARCM is not titled on page, which shows the dispute is clearly between MM* (Zamsort) and ES (consolidated adv. services Ltd.)

*Kalaba is part of Zamsort’s assets and now under insolvency act 9 of 2017:

hxxps://osall.org.za/docs/2019/07/Zambia-Corporate-Insolvency-Act-9-of-2017.pdf

From the link above… think its like Chapter 11 and not classed as Chapter 7 - distressed fire sales of assets!