Member Info for Fruitsnveg

I very much doubt we will be waiting several months for a structured response from the company TLWilliams. It's a bit like the 'Early 2022' conundrum which resulted in so much debate. Most were proved very wrong in their overly-pessimistic take on when the company would report - just a very unremarkably acceptable 7 weeks into the new year, as it turned out. .. All lessons to learn from.

Tonight, at the CEPI conference in London. "The PM said this was a 'crucial part' of how countries can meet the '100-day mission... to make safe and effective diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines available within the first 100 days of a future pandemic threat being identified'.
He added: 'After the tragedy of the last two years, it is incumbent on all of us to work harder than ever in preparing to meet future pandemic threats."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10590465/Risk-pandemic-HIGH-Chris-Whitty-warns.html

So what's the impact here? Name change to an LLP? Voting rights?
Anyone?

Nothing to see here.

My apologies, it's Brooke.

Yes, well Costas, the CEO will be busy trying to salvage what can be salvaged, per Brook's email, rather than address the masses with exactly the same message that she has relayed to us. I see no benefit for shareholders in management consecrating a few hours for an interview. If the message remains the same, it would amount to a time-wasting exercise to assuage a few, which as a large group we really don't need. I guess Brook and RM recognise that.

"But it seems unrealistic IMO to expect much before the summer ".

I disagree Tommy, I would absolutely expect the results of a data deep dive BEFORE Summer, no question, and there is nothing the company have said that points to such a delayed exercise? I cannot see it taking 4+ months, no chance IMO.

'Coulda woulda shoulda'. My advice Docdaneeka s to focus on what's recoverable, focus on what's possible and focus on what's in front of us, not behind. Talk of pitiful acceptance of TO breadcrumbs is vastly immature, and pessimistic in the extreme. Leave the doubt sowing to the likes of the HF's and piranhas. They don't need 'LTH's' to do their bidding for them, do they?

TLWilliams,

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.15.480166v1
Study dd Feb 2022

"The results demonstrate the difficulty of identifying broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2"

So detailed patient records for each triallist TommyD_19?

I hate to admit it, but I trust my pharmacist more than my GP.

Emma, a bit of advice - focus on the wood not the trees. That's what the NIH have done.

Emma is a rampant shorter " ...the economic state of the equity market became an issue in my opinion and I felt it better to switch positions from long to short. Isn't that what traders do? Buy low, sell high? I'm not gonna hold any stock that I think will deteriorate."

-> Green box.

GFU hAndy.

Excellent Greenfish.

Fair cop V10.

My typo, both posts dd 21/02/22, not oct.

21/02: "Wow very dodgy here. I hope the management team will be resigning. No credibility and cannot be trusted to run the company."

21/10: They have no product. It's crap.".

V10, after both these posts you still wrote to the head of Comms looking for a clarification update, or was it something else you asked?

“We don’t have many antiviral options,” says Horby. “If we lost any, it would be a disaster.”

That may prove to be our saving grace.

" I don't blame them if they are working 15hrs a day with global regulators and M&A or BD&L partners but if not..."

What kind of weird joke is this Elsol? Do you think Polygon are adding whilst the Board sit around and naval gaze at their feet in some kind of semi-stupor? Do you think Polygon are THAT stupid? The BOD will be working flat out, as many on here know ,but to say so would blow up their self-serving narrative. I trust the genuinely invested here are not buying this crud.