Member Info for Fruitsnveg

Well Rick, clearly some US experts have shown interest otherwise plans wouldn't now include US ICU's. I doubt they'd engage, especially in high stakes critical care, if they didn't feel it was worth it.

Make of that what you will.

Doc83, humor me and hold fire on the 'I told you so's' until AFTER the company communicate the minutae of their funding plan to shareholders....

You could be wrong, but then you could be right Costas. See you here again at 7am tomo?

Nope. The term was used twice in the published June AR Report, so no slip'o the tongue (or candy verbiage):

"Preparatory work for a trial commenced in 2023 and has continued into 2024. The company is currently finalising potential trial structures and a potential financing plan to enable it to pursue an ENHANCED trial structure. If this comes about, details will be communicated in due course. "

"ENHANCED research and development relief"

I think this must be hard for you DocDan. "Candy verbiage". .....Lol!

Gotta spend money to make money Costas, right?

And potentially the delay in the AGM. And PM leaving. And MBP being brought in, now that commercial viability is strengthened on new assay news...

Spacer,

You lost me at "couldn't act to date because they couldn't break the familial ties in the Boardroom".

All I can now see are scenes from The Godfather, which I cannot unsee, however hard I try.

No amount of creative writing on your part (award-winning and at it's spectacular finest today btw) can help me through another of your 'SNG lost in space' riffs....

Thanks Brand, I agree.

(For clarity my last comment was to DocDan).

You claim doesn't make a difference but also state important for Synairgen to be using it as part of their trial

Not much sense to that logic that I can see.

A key piece of the jigsaw! Casanova et al would have known this was going to be published a least a few months ago. It may explain the patience that was needed wile this unfolded. For sure it's a big positive for Synairgen.

If TFG have "let the Synairgen management twiddle their thumbs for the last 3 years", I'm a peanut butter cookie. TFG are well-researched. If they haven't acted to date it's because they know the current path is the money shot.

.....needs what Tattyhead, a CEO?

I assume all of you disgruntled people will be attending the AGM to walk the walk and not just talk the talk?

yes my argument is perfectly rational and based on my long-standing research and knowledge of the company to date.

banger's rationale seems to be identical to the one he employs on other bb's ( along the lines of '$**** company! $hit bod! sack em all!' yada yada yada...). as for doc83, he just appears to have forgotten that he pretty much sold out months ago. if it's rational you're looking for, today might not be one for the books.

If you want him gone, come up with a named replacement and a plan that doesn't derail company strategy to increase majority shareholder value as soon as possible. Otherwise accept that he majority of shareholders probably care less about your feelings than they do about getting a return on their investment.

If the company can present a doable plan to achieve that, I won't be voting for change at this juncture.

Because of you don't have a better, tangible and majority shareholder-friendly solution to offer, you may find much less support than anticipated.

I am always of the opinion that to effect meaningful change, one must bring a solution to the table, and not just a problem.

What solution are those unhappy with the CEO willing to put forward, that will neither derail or stymy plans and will benefit other shareholders?

I hope you're prepared for the answer, Bangers.

Why would he go?