Member Info for FrankyS1971

56-57P is also a good entry point. 10p is a good entry point. 2p is. ???WTF. GUY? this share has the propensity to double PDQ on not that much so sorry I'll say again 75-80p will look good in few months at worst. You're very welcome to disagree. I do agree with you the state of the board. when are you leaving it?lol

75-80p for those that got spiked is still a decent entry point as 2-3 months down the line may well show!

Huge Market in India even without the poorest able to get access. Calm thee down RNS with major Sales order to land.

Marks needed the Amigo profit to buy Arb on the dips. Trust me I 've seen more dips on that then at a Harvester Restaurant.

You should get the patents sold and return the cash to the SHolders as its just being run down and the money is NOT being used for what was stated.

I was listening to Antony Legge and his spiel on vid. The guy is literally full of sh&t. Its all guff and I'm not deramping - just saying what I see. He Talks about the machine not being important and the masks not being the future of the business and that shareholders are too focused on it. ..Then next.. how they have a 3rd party to meet orders and it was really important to focus on the capabilities so they could deliver and not over-promise. Ermmmmm so then in the next sentence he's as good as said we're not focusing on trying to sell the mask as its not the future. Whattt?? so hang on ...recap...we've focused on being able to deliver but we're not actually going to bother delivering anyway so its neither here nor there about building the capabilities???!. Then.....he goes on about the mask AGAIN talking about its properties and benefits. He talks about the product having much broader applications and the volume of ideas that DR Cave comes up with. So there you have it. A business with lots of great ideas, no actual markets and no clear direction. These guys need proper leadership and are absolutely uninvestable until they deliver clear products/markets and a path to profitability which may never actually happen. Until the new CEO delivers a clear timetable and focus for the business, you can't expect any volume of serious investors to come along and bolster the SP. So even if you are 50% down. Thats not 60 or 70 or 80% down. You can stick this in Barrick Gold or something solid and make that back over the next couple of years. sorry to be so doomy but this is easy to see when there is no emotional attachment to the stock.

It's an aim listed penny stock so no great shock. Pretty clear that the mask is not economically viable and the cost of production too high. No sales no revenue no growth and team will pump some new endeavor get some new suckers via an equity raise and then off you go again.

I flitered Yurine. What a tedious runt. At no point have Amigo stated there is no equity left in the business. Indeed the judge and FCA rather think there is a far amount left hence a restructure. yurine p%ss pants. Bye bye.

Hi mark..Bybrook are spotting a good one here. They go long on the equities and use the upside in a couple of years or so to buy distressed bonds...they re in long term. Can t help thinking that 40p LTIP might take a while to get there if we het diluted by 60-70%

They are clear buys for the avoidance of doubt. Bybrook likely to be at it again IMO. Therefore RNS s by end of week.

Almost too subtle HH! There s only one joke in town an it starts with Y and sounds like Urine.

Is it not indicating an off book trade?

We all regret that insider but time is a funny thing. Look again in 3-4 months perhaps. you might look back at this and scratch your head!:-)

Yuri sounds even worse than Acaciatan. its not even a sentence so I'll try and talk your language.
Ends of the nob that rubbish the talk difference make none. Sad is life of yours that you board coming on to offer nothing to peoples but comments of your sh*t. Karma not good.

its an interesting debate honewood but I think the "FCA have said what they don't want and not what they do" moan by our lawyer in the sanction hearing, along with RNS about "discussions with the FCA" post the Scheme failure suggests that actually there is now communication over what is required. My half-way house with you is that the FCA will not be advising on how to restructure but more on what they think would be adequate to put in the pot and what their minimum requirement is, not how Amigo arrives at that. This would likely make the most sense and bear out both views.

There is plenty of fun and games for traders and investors alike where Amigo is concerned. Though there is another sub-set category I like to call "moron" that's individuals or one specifically who wants to buy at 6.xp and sell at 7.xp wow. thats ambition for you!:-:::::::::::::-)

Honewood - You may be right about the FCA not negotiating but you may very well be wrong. Sheldon Miles explicitly stated that the FCA needs to intervene more on the supply side and work with lenders to have the sector work better. A dilution of only 10-20% I'd be staggered. Its bound to be significantly more IMO but a sanctioned SOA and relending will make that a short-term consideration. We also don't know what the mechanics of a restructure will look like so understand with the uncertainty derisking makes entire sense. I'm personally holding as I believe with a whiff of SOA2 and noise that there is a "small window of opportunity to save the business" or words to that effect, you'll see 12-13p fairly quickly. All the dynamics that saw the price spike to 30p are still there and its in the FCA and Business interest to see the MCAP up for raising equity, so I won't be selling as I expect news by end of July when we report our numbers. It would be foolish to believe that this is over just yet.

I don t agree techno this was all about the share price. They had loads of time to challenge on the basic tenents and opted not too until the political pressure from the media talking about "fat cat" mgt etc rose along with SP. It looks like the FCA runs on a populist basis.

out of interest Sara Saggyt**s has been advocating that claimants are better off in admin if the uphold rates are kept down by Amigo. If the FCA redress formula keeps redress up at the 85-90% mark and the amount therefore needed to be raised is therefore eye poppingly higher, would we/claimants indeed be better off in admin? Worth a discussion.

The truth is, the FCA spent much time debating the share price in court and using it as a weapon to illustrate the level of equity in the business and the path to a better deal. That they loaded the gun in the first place, through their inaction, only to then fire it at Amigo BOD is a clear manipulation and an over-reach for any regulator. Effectively they have influenced a share price for their benefit which is no different from insider trading is it not???

Yuri you don t half talk a lot of rubbish at times. There are 10-12m adults making up sub prime. Thats not niche its main stream. You also don t have a clue about the ceedit builder products in the offing. Only thing i d say is that the guarantor model needs to be tightened so they know what they re signing up for and no top up loans clearly. Trying to sounds all sage like about future business volumes when you don t have a clue is plain daft.