Member Info for Foxhill

You make it feel imminent. :-)

Yes - it is your opinion.

Yes - you are wrong.

My next ID will be two facedduplicitousfox - just so we can have something in common.

Get back to Puerto Ostentatious and tell us if you see PF looking in Estate Agents windows :-)

You’re supposed to be on hols.

No need to ramp.

Or talk *******s.

Updates and their timeliness. are kind of irrelevant if it’s just another confirmation of not doing what you hoped/expected/ set out in your last RNS.

I wonder where ‘cusp’ sits on a timetable. There’ll be different degrees of cuspiness - otherwise it’d be a recognised unit of time. Hopefully with “several” projects (which I’ll assume is 3 or more on the grounds that the board knows the words ‘one’ and ‘couple’)

Let’s hope one of them is so cusp-tastic that we see at least two deals in the next six weeks. Else they weren’t very on the cusp.

Nobody has a clue.

At the end of your first paragraph.

You state that your decision to invest more in WSG - even at this price is NOT based on what he’s said. It is based on what he DOES.

My point related to the PRICE of a placing.

Nobody (if they’re reasonable) would object to a placing in conjunction with a contract.

Trouble is, based on what’s been said, we’ve seen placing for anticipated POST CONTRACT expenditure. It’s what they SAID! That was years ago. We didn’t spend a penny on post contract expenditure.

What he says. What he’d rather do. Come on..

It doesn’t matter what he says.

Naturally he’d rather not raise. Why would he say anything else.

I wasn’t being negative or selective. Surely dwelling on the suggestion that PF’s funding options might improve radically in just two weeks, from that statement, is an outrageous ramp, given their history?

IF your quote is verbatim, then he threw ‘probably’ in there - which reduces it to wishful thinking.

30 to 40 days. Might be less. Generates FOMO.

Tick tock. Or back to normal.

He’s said a lot of things.

He’s also said (re placing price) in the next week or two.

I won’t be surprise if we go into August - still waiting.

Sept would be taking the ****.

There. Oops

:-)

Don’t want to be here that long. I’ll pass you the baton at about 80p. I’m not moaning. I’m not excited. I’m just being realistic. 16p better than 6p obviously. Still a long way to go - and that’s dependent on a close, or two.

Of course - when 40 days gets here - we’ll be well into cusp-time. So it might be reasonable to expect more news if their was any substance to those comments.

Is that better?

:-)

Friday? Next Tuesday? Next Friday. Doesn’t matter.

Sooner rather than later. Naturally. But that’s a bit ambiguous.

If 40 days pass. Then judgement comes into question -again.

If you’re hoping for tomorrow - then I suspect you’re setting

Why isn’t Charles house hunting? :-)

Yep. Have good weekend. Either way...

I don’t think anyone gives a $hit which day it turns up on.

We don’t want another update.

Just a contract confirmation with enough information to enable the market to attribute a value. No point on tormenting yourself with this day or that.

500k. Want another wager?

Was it do as I suggest - (topping Up) - or do as I do.

Oddly - no-one has taken your advice. Spooky.

Quizzed PF about the African Airport we signed six months ago. Can that still realistically be just musical chairs?

That Alias is successfully holding himself back from this topping up opportunity this morning. Very conscientious.

Bobby was contemplating the ‘astonishing’ possibilities earlier.

I’ll be astonished if this materialises within 40 day. If it goes beyond that - we’re back in standard WSG indeterminate delay territory.

The activity level corresponds directly with belief and previous disappointment.

I’m surprised that you’re surprised.

Fingers still crossed.

He loves an issue to address.

Was it coincidence that PF’s desperately sought LoI arrived the day before the AGMi.

Is it a coincidence, for a company with a stated ‘schtum’ policy - that WSG has been pumping out RNS’s and singing like a canary on Proactive from 7p to 17p - just as our (only?) long term II elects to dispose of their position - despite multiple ‘cuspiness’. Or just very bad timing for our otherwise patient II.

IF PF signs something - undoubtedly the latter.

IF he doesn’t and finds himself needing to raise - then there’s an altogether different complexion.

Killed two birds with a flurry of stones.

You wouldn’t want the prospect of a raise with the SP at 7p and your II in the departure lounge.

Just conjecture. Or coincidence? Tick tock

Delighted to hear that Warren is doing research on WSG...

FFS!!