Member Info for Foxhill

Go back. He raised for anticipated post contract expenditure when Iran was just a few issues from,, blah blah.

Not a penny spent on post... you get it.

Doesn’t matter what he says...

Here’s another classic.

He stated monies were for anticipated post contract expenditure.

Precisely the point. There is no contract.

Perhaps a Fowler freindly e-mailer could ask PF about NTScan and whether we’ve otherwise agreed terms?

In talks for a year. I think someone said.
Know when it’s opening.
30 days beyond that.
Run it without.
No timescale on extension declared.
They are dicking you about Fowler.

I’ve no doubt that if MPS were minded they could draw up a list of a dozen company’s. Pick one. Agree terms and sign a contract in a fortnight. From today. Good ol’ WSG can babysit in the interim. Because as someone said earlier why would they walk away. Because they can’t afford to.
See raise.

:-) Because something isn’t as it seems presumably.

That’s a year old.

:-)

All those options and warrants floating about.

I only read the first couple of lines. Why would MPS do this if they are a proper operation overseeing a multi- million pound project.

My question. If the LoI is so comprehensive - what’s the issue with the contract?

I’ll wager that we sail (no pun intended) through August with no contract or KuspyKontracts, or AfriKa.

So why didn’t it happen in 30 days.

What happens to that placing - if they had.

Explain to me what incentive there is for MPS to sign a contract - when we are fulfilling the role without such.

&

What leverage do WSG have with MPS now that we’ve gone to work without one.

Thought. Did WSG agree to commence in this way because they had a funding requirement as set out in this latest ‘pleased’ RNS and a SP 40% below nominal.

IF PF genuinely thought that the contract would have closed in 30 days - and the LoI is sufficiently comprehensive to permit us to function in the way we are, terms, liabilities, risks and all those other things that in contract form appear to be so difficult. What’s to stop them signing expeditiously.

Speculation. The difference is commitment or let’s say intent. Doesn’t feel to me that we’re being presented with the whole truth. That’s AIM.

I’m heading for Towcester... that’s true.
I’m actually leaving my kitchen toward the utility. It’s north. So statement 1 is true. But very misleading.

Sorry Towcester. Another day.

Apologies mate.

Again all due respect. Don’t want to be fighting with the real long suffering LTH’s here - especially on a day like this. But it’s not exactly the first time that he’s completely misjudged a situation that results in significant dilution - is it.

Don’t take this personally. We know there’s a bloody port.
We know it’s open. We know it’s expanding. We know that boats come and go. We know we’re doing scanning.

We know we still haven’t turned an LoI that’s tantamount to a contract - into a ****ing contract.

For the Brown-nosers to spin this.

:-)

Did I say only?

Not that bothered.

Raised at 10p with warrants. No, top drawer stuff.

He knew.

...and that’s with our umpteenth upgrade of FCO!!