Member Info for Foxhill

A sample of the sentiment in Twitterland.

“#WSG Same as HNR, full of **** this management.
ZEN, AAOG, LAM...
These people belong to prison...”

I’m not suggesting that he’s right, nor that I concur. Just quite hard to find genuine faith in the bumblettes - aside from those already voiced here.

Some of the Twitterland (DM’s & groups) output is unrepeatable.

Consensus is same old/night follows day.

Potential, placing - disappointment. Disappear.

Thursday needs to be unambiguous.

The market is evidently unconvinced that (despite the fact that WSG are currently doing what they are supposed to do according to a draft contract) we’ll close the contract.

That’s history/reputation for you.

Why do you think he’s down to his last thread? The past?

So why are we the only folk working for nowt.

We DID sign the Asian border contract - and that still came to nowt.

We did sign the consolation Africa airport - come to nowt.

Still there’s still the cuspies and the MoU that no-one gives a toss about anymore.

New focus. Tema.

Focus very hard.

What ferry? See, gone....

I’d have been gone in the interim.

Should’ve signed Iran in 2016.

Guess what stopped that?

Expansion of scope...

“Expansion of scope” is an age old filling in a WSG **** sandwich. A filling never tasted because the expanded scope never gets closed - probably because it got expanded too much and took too long and significant parties got moved on, retired or died of old age.

IF this doesn’t happen, it will make the ferry look debacle look good. At least we bought a boat, tick.

Thought 30 days was long enough. Else why settle on 30 days. We’re heading toward double that. It’s taking the ****.

I don’t want a mention or an update....

A CONTRACT

I don’t care if millions of TEU’s start being teleported into Tema from the dark side. Three times a week.

‘Just want a bloody contract signed. It’s not unreasonable.

Or an explanation. Can’t go on much longer like this. Absurd.

He’s unfamiliar.

‘Goes to PB on the coach. :-)

Impressive Flagship - please.

But nobody will be surprised if August draws the a close and it’s still in limbo...

You’ll be wrong again then :-)

We are in the presence of masters.

There was a time when PF needed to close something it’s now. 30 days overdue. 40 days overdue. Couple of weeks overdue. Cusps’ overdue. Nobody’s surprised, naturally.

Tick tock. The sun gets ever lower of the ‘dial.

But you do.

But in the event that this is going to materialise into an equitable relationship of some ongstanding and MPS’s intentions are good - and assuming they are levying a charge to shippers for the scanning service currently being run at this flagship (you did that on purpose?) Port. Then,

There is surely no reason why WSG won’t be reimbursed for work undertaken.

...and why, if this is a flagship facility, are (seemingly) so many sub-contractors, functioning without contracts. Are they all performing FOC?

I apologise. I had no idea that you and Mohammed went right back to the day. What an insight that must provide.

Bonus.

All good then.

Just puts a question mark over why the contract didn’t get signed within the 30 days of the LoI - which presumably both parties considered sufficient. Or since....

“Cheque’s in the post...

I’ve used similar analogy’s. There must be some agreement to pay us for the work we’re doing - even if that is at a rate yet to be formalised.

If we’re doing it gratis and open ended then that would beggar belief.

They ‘know what they’re doing” doesn’t offer much comfort when you look at their track record. I won’t list.

Hard to see that they have any leverage, bar walking offsite?