Member Info for Foxhill

And certainly not holding my breath on news prophecies..

‘Assume it’ll need to close above any given figure...

Not holding my breath on tech prophecies..

Took the words out of my mouth on tech target - might it might have moved. ;-)

Oh yes!! Seven figure action!

There’s always ‘greys’ to argue over - but in my experience they just fuel/love the brinksmanship.

Accept all cases are unique.

Fingers crossed.

Wasn’t the LoI so comprehensive that it wasn’t far short of a contract? They’ve only had a year, knew when it was going to open etc...

What’s complex about $/TEU?

If terms on responsibilities/liabilities/anything significant really - etc are “complex” - why are we commencing without?

:-)

But that exclusivity is for a period, no?

What’s the point of the Letter of intent?

If the issuance of a valid contract is not yet in their control?

On top of which - why still (re?)negotiating in the eleventh hour?

Only if it’s relevant.

I think all T/A is cobblers. But I’m not going to pick a fight with every chartist - and certainly don’t see why it’s relevant to question someone’s health issues.

If you haven’t got used to the baseless bollocks that gets spewed on boards daily - you’e not trying hard enough!

It’s not against LSE rules to go mad with your vowels anddd consonants ;-)

Give T-line fang shway bollie convergence a miss - and chill.

Have MPS resolved their issues with Nick the Not Scanning Co?

Welcome back - ‘you had some time off in light of the ‘good’’ news?

No AGM comment?

Andy

I’m not quite sure what you’re getting at there. I’m #1 Mr Unpopular hereabouts. Gay’s alright. I have thick skin and endeavour to be reasonable - Alias is the exception.

African squabble. “Messed up” makes sense now.
Hopefully resolved - else PF wouldn’t have that LoI !

The media agenda/reliability also needs to be weighed.

I’ve said before - a long time ago - that the last thing that many of our target (the folk running) countries want - is security.

Perfect example - if accusations therein are true.

MPS being “unaware” sounds like a weak defence. Ministries unaware of one another’s activities - no surprise.

Old article. So hopefully resolved and that LoI has meaning.

Anybody fancy putting it to PF for comment?

I think there might be a buy order in. Sells being consumed.

And you’ve evidently never ‘known’.

Just constant wishful babble.

I don’t get the significance/requirement for a detailed (nigh on a contract) being issue just two weeks before you open such a big facility - especially when it’s security related?

The contract numbers hadn’t been finalised - or it was “messed up”.

I don’t see how it could have been both?

I don’t believe the latter.

That’s why we’re still ticking along just north of nominal. They’ve all got lovely new Tema T-shirts and are prepping the new big toys and yet no contract - combined with speculation that the promise of any good news at WSG usually precedes a placing. Not enough in it yet to get one away. More news that’s not an actual contract will increase that suspicion. Not long to find out. The fact that we have a team out there means little - if the operator is content to open and function without a contract. We’re dispensable.

If the contract was ‘messed up” suggestiog an error or misunderstanding - why are there still finalising of figure and up to 40 days required? What happens thereafter. Somebody else runs it FOC?

‘2nd that. ;)

Keep up Pocket.

Quick question - if you don’t mind. Do you know if anybody quizzed PF on Africa timescale expectations?

Ta.