Member Info for Foxhill

Pete’s been frustrated in Africa for nearly 10 years. You’re right we all know the bureaucracy is a nightmare.

You’d hope that our “glorious leader” (not my words) with his experience of same, and being the guy front and centre, with presumably the additional guidance from the DRC’s AA , would finally, having agreed the contract with them, have a grip on timescale. As Arab says - it’s his job!! Has he leant nothing since Lungi was gifted??

You’ve been wrong since (at least) 2016.

Pete hasn’t delivered his first proper airport deal for 9.5 years - and so the sceptics are still justified and far more realistic than you’ve managed to be in that time.

Pete’s can kicking/failure/disappointment is why he continues to attract criticism and the market is wholly unconvinced of his, or Human’s output.

What he says and what transpires are invariably at odds.

Which is why folk have been walking away all month. Pete’s published appraisal of the timescales and conditions set out in ‘contract’ he signed has been woefully inaccurate.
EVERY component has been missed or simply disregarded by the DRC if you don’t wake up on Monday or Tuesday (allowing for RNS submission) to find that ratification and op’s occurred simultaneously. Africa’s modus’ is NOT responsible for Pete’s judgement.

At least lowering your average has been a doddle in recent years, to get those 30p babies purchased and unswervingly held, down.

Thus far the only thing that you are right on is that there will be an exodus on ratification. That’ll be refreshing for you on several levels.

In the meantime what Pete says is evidently dismissed by the wider market, period.

Yep. I think we both have the same definition of nails, ie commitment/some certainty. Mast - hitting said objective.

I see no reason why, having re-affirmed several times that 21 rev’s would be hit, that he should be excused when there not - or the basis that it will all hopefully materialise in 22.

DRC was supposed to be “near term” in ‘20 wasn’t it - when Pete first started getting chatty/fund raising.

He also nailed his colours to the mast on ‘21 Rev’s.

Arden are on Pete’s ‘payroll’. Theirs views are unlikely to conflict with his. Have they ever conflicted? How often is Pete right?

First his hat (Feb’ haha) and now his cat’s only got a week to live.

I’d not be surprised if Pete’s simply found himself in very familiar territory. An Airport Authority likes the concept - but Governments unconvinced.

Broker/Pete’s 15m rev’s starting to look like a fantasy, unless something radical happens, for the first time in a decade.

I won’t be surprised if DRC is still pending come March. After all there’s another African opportunity somewhere, that’s still subject to a ‘reorganisation’ - joke.

But hey, at least, as you say, Pete lives on with his accumulative debts cleared.

“Days or weeks, not months’ yeah right. Wrong again!!

I’m guessing they won’t be.

I thought you’d satisfied yourself on your investment here courtesy of regular BoD comms?

Just ask them.

Wrong surname.

I’d refer to think that Vincent is fronting this. ‘Gives is a chance.

??

…and if ratification is a formality (nothing in Africa is) - it’s a painfully slow formality which is probably six months old already.

…Pete might be able to cloud the issue/placate with troops on the ground in DRC - but I don’t think there is any chance that op’s (as in Tema) can commence with government consent, in the form ratification. The Government evidently don’t care what Pete agreed with the airport authority. If a month or two here or there doesn’t matter now “days or weeks…as opposed to months” was (three months on!!) wishful *******s - and what was the point in putting timescales and contingencies in a contract if they all get ignored. The contract becomes pointless. “Can’t be unsigned” I don’t get - it’s still conditional upon ratification - and that hasn’t happened as Pete and the AA anticipated, not by a long chalk.

Isn’t the ambiguity, ineptitude and multiple missed deadlines. I just can’t believe that IF the Chinese are on board, that they are prepared to be dicked about year after year!!?

They’re not investors - they’re opportunistic financiers/flippers.

Fiduciary care is rarely experienced in AIM. The majority of listings are loss making ‘ventures’. CEO’s rarely give a toss about investors. The Nomad is on the payroll, the Chair is normally a mate. GL.

But, of course, the sensors themselves aren’t a recurring purchase. I imagine (like everything else we sell) they’re expensive and we p to probably knock them out with very small margin. Beyond that Star collects and keeps the whole SaaS payment in order to fund the monitoring service. It’s this recurring income that makes supplying the hardware commercially viable.

Just have to hope that CropX sticks with Star.

I’m still waiting for the need to differentiate simultaneous quadratic equations, in Tesco’s? Never happens!!

Have you been saving that - or was it new ‘research’.

Love it, made me laugh.

With nuts.

World domination. Must contain ‘self.