Member Info for Foxhill

It just takes LSE an age to update!! Doh

Of reasonable debt funding so offensive that the post gets deleted Mike? :-)

Or, with so many recurring revenue projects secured, change policy, break the habit of the last decade and acquired some reasonable debt funding that the business pays back rather than shareholders.

Yep, dates mangled. Retract. Apologies.

I like your assumption that the interims will have a positive impact. They are three weeks late, currently.

But I don’t think there’s ever been a succession of decent RNS’s, that have actually come to something.

They need a succession of decent RNS worthy contracts to convince AIMers that there’s a growth story as opposed to declining rev’s. A huge DHL order might be sufficient - but that’s conjecture.

Someone’s letting themselves out 1,000,000 at a time.

:-)

Existing holders & fence sitters. Buys were very thin on the ground.

It’s all sounded promising for years though, therein lies the main problem. As you say, it needs to be closed.

Did I make any suggestion “that I’d nail my balls to a wall” (unnecessarily childish - but I appreciate my viewpoint annoys you.

IF remains valid. The market is unconvinced. I gave it a timescale, your challenge didn’t.

STILL related to excuses.

Can you read?

Try again, then think for a moment - and you might be able to answer your own question..

Less trades than listeners?

All sounds very promising. But the enthusiasm hereabouts evidently isn’t shared by the market. IF they are going to ratify DRC and do 15.7 in ‘21 - that should significantly impact the SP in the coming months - there’s only four to go. (I’m learning Ian)

Pete’s had 10 years of being fobbed off by potential African clients - so if anyone should have learned not to suggest “formality” or “days or weeks - not months” it’s him. So it’s pretty poor to hear that multiple dept’s etc are STILL the excuse for delays.

Sounds like there’s lots going on, always has been. ‘Never materialised yet though, hence ‘markets reaction. It’s absolutely not interested in what Pete says anymore - credibility it seems is evidently gone ENTIRELY until contracts are signed UNCONDITIONALLY.

If they do 15.7 - I’ll pay for a slap up dinners at your namesake.

Yep. Ta. Derrr!!? ;-)

I said that I’m in for less and will give it until Sept. I don’t talk my book. Just say as I see. ‘Realism’ often doesn’t satisfy excitable holders.

I questioned meeting expectations (15.7) this morning. That’s trolling obviously - until Arden rowed back to a figure almost exactly as I’d suggested. And that’s dissing?

My comments won’t impact the SP. That’s Fowler’s job. I can’t complete with the wonderful work he’s done over the decade.

It also appears that my pre-open ‘won’t be surprised if it falls’ was more realistic than the comments elsewhere.

He needs to ratify DRC. Then I’ll be off.

Let’s face it, Arden think they are gonna do 7 to 8 million in the next 10 week. He’s gonna have to come up with something radical PDQ - or Arden are going to be revising backwards again.

Tic toc

I was out.

Bought some of Pete’s near term confetti.

See a lift and de-risk.

Do Arden suggest 250% uplift in H2 in their latest note?

Is that 7.5/8m ish on top of 3.6 in H1?

Is that 11.8m max.

Is that 4m short of their previous expectation?

We’re they wrong with 15.7.

Could they be wrong again.

Do we run Africa’s premiere ferry service.

Might this be why the market takes WSG/Arden output with a large dose.

For balance, I agree with Ian & Aiming. A DRC will serial WSG and hopefully provide a decent lift for the SP.

You and Reece however are naive and somewhat deluded!!

If you can spout wishful $hite - and yet not address my reasonable questions you can put your “trolls” up your southern-most sphincter!!

There’s not a hope of them doing 15.7 in ‘21.

You’ve got a new Arden to read. Good luck.

I’ll assume that ratification happens in the next fortnight - or we start Op’s on Sept 1 without a contract AGAIN.

IF DRC doesn’t kick in pronto then there’s no hope of profit this year.