RE: News articles3 Dec 2025 08:58
Yep, it's usually the fat greedy management that fold when offered a big pay day or exit. 'People' are always the weakeness and always targeted first. You can't target mother nature or the resources as they speak for themselves.
Part of me wants SOLG to go it alone. I want them to do an open pit low hanging fruit production mine on TAM. I want them to do the same on Porvenir. Just those two assets could throw off serious profits. Then further down the line... look at doing a JV on the block cave aspect of Cascabel once we've skimmed off the nice and easy stuff (sub level plan). Meanwhile, use some cash to explore the 60 odd licences... discovery the early stages of more Tier1 mines... there might be 3 of them or 5 of them or none of them. What price would we be then??
I reckon the above would take about 2 to 3 years and yes there would be some dilution but not much imho.
Trouble is.... we've signed a deal with Franco/Osisko that is based on a different plan... and to get the third tranche we need to follow that plan. That said... I reckon Franco would be open to some tweaks as we move forwards.
Bottom line... it's always about 'time' and I think we have some investors in Sangha, Irwin and others that want to exit. It's that impatience that will likely hand the top paragraph to the chinese or a super major. They'll do it differently but lets get real here... Porvenir and TAM are likely worth £1.5bln by themselves.
The only light at end of tunnel would be if we can spin out the ExploreCo and sell off just ENSA... then we get best of both worlds. That's what I want most.