Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
MSCI waiting for Bill to punch back lol ...
However MSCI is a bunch of funds and you can find the full details of what they do and who they are on the MSCI website you can find the main data at MSCI . COM
There are lots of parts to MSCI, and when it came to GGP and EUA they joined part of the MSCI emerging markets fund, again based on MCAP, and the when the MCAP drops these funds may also decide to sell out.
It's pretty clear for anyone to see that there was in the later part deemed sanction risk which led some to also leaver sell fully. Each Bank or Fund make their own choice...
MSCI is not owned by BlackRock. BlackRock just happen to be one of the largest funds globally.
As of 6/03/2023, The largest holdings were by rank % by Owners
The Vangurds Group Inc
Black Rock Fund Advisors
SSgA Funds Management INC
Massachusetts Financial Services
AllianceBernstein LP
BAMCO Inc
Fidelity Management & Research
Capital Research &Management
Fiera Capital Corp
Geode Capital
That does not include by Fund emerging market etc, Source CNN Business.
Full details on MSCI and their funds can be found on MSCI .COM
Not advice
MSCI Bill -Morgan Stanley Capital International
Morgan Stanley Capital International, or MSCI, is a firm that provides investment data and analytics services to investors. It was formed in 1986 when Morgan Stanley bought the licensing rights to data from Captial International.
Toffers how does the BOD of GGP or EUA change the MCAP of MSCI funds buying or selling ?
The MCAP needs to be a certain size before the buy in - and it is reviewed - that's what MSCI does -
It's very easy to read up on MSCI Emerging Markets ...
I did not ask for any threads to be removed .
I accidentally uploaded a pdf under a previous moniker. LSE wouldn't remove it as a single post - so I asked them to remove everything I posted with a formal Internet takedown request.
As for Spikey , have you forgotten his months of posts during suspension?
Do I care what he posts - in nutshell no.
Has Wolfe every changed his mind?
It up to him - could not care less.
Has Scuaba posted under a different moniker - btw I could not care less.
Did I get it wrong about Russia invading Ukraine yes .
However I would remind everyone that you can read far too much into what is posted on a BB.
Can I bothered with the constant misinformation no...
Toffers - I have you boxed and don't see your posts unless I am logged out - as in this Morning.
I did not join to pump the stock, I uploaded a PDF by accident with by previous Moniker FTSEDOW, I asked LSE to delete - the only way the could do was deleting everything , as they said they could not delete 1 single post.
I have lost money on some stocks , but I do not spend every hour possible on a BB trying to change history.
Have a good day.
Part 2 - footer to RNS - ncorrect voting recommendations previously published on certain stockbroking platforms
On Saturday 8 July 2023, the Board became aware that certain of the Company's shareholders (including some Board members) had received communications from several online stockbroking platforms, stating incorrectly that (a) the General Meeting had already been convened (which, at that time, it had not) and (b) the Board were advising shareholders to vote for the resolutions to remove the current directors and to appoint boohoo's nominees (which, as above, is the exact opposite of the Board's recommendation). The Company has contacted the relevant online stockbroking platforms, as well as the appropriate regulatory authorities.
The Board urges shareholders to follow its voting recommendation, which, pending the possible compromise with boohoo, is to vote AGAINST all of boohoo's proposed resolutions at the General Meeting. Any shareholders who have accidentally already voted in favour of boohoo's proposed resolutions via their online stockbroking platforms on the basis of the incorrectly presented Board recommendation referred to above should contact those platforms as soon as possible to change their votes from votes in favour to votes AGAINST all of boohoo's proposed resolutions.
("Revolution Beauty", the "Group" or the "Company")
Notice of general meeting requisitioned by boohoo Group plc
Revolution Beauty Group plc (AIM: REVB), the multi-channel mass beauty innovator, today announces that, following the letter and accompanying notice dated 19 June 2023 received from boohoo Group plc ("boohoo"), a general meeting of the Company will be held at the offices of Macfarlanes LLP at 20 Cursitor Street, London, EC4A 1LT at 11:00 on 7 August 2023 (the "General Meeting").
Notice of General Meeting
The notice of the General Meeting will be dispatched shortly to those shareholders who have elected not to receive electronic communications, and an electronic copy will be available shortly on the investor section of the Company's website www.revolutionbeautyplc.com/results-and-reports/.
At the General Meeting, the following resolutions, all of which have been proposed by boohoo, will be proposed as ordinary resolutions:
1. That Alistair McGeorge be appointed as a director of the Company.
2. That Neil Catto be appointed as a director of the Company.
3. That Robert Holt be removed as a director of the Company.
4. That Derek Zissman be removed as a director of the Company.
5. That Elizabeth Lake be removed as a director of the Company.
The board of the Company (the "Board") unanimously recommends that shareholders VOTE AGAINST ALL OF THE RESOLUTIONS to be proposed at the General Meeting.
Potential compromise with boohoo
However, the Board believes that a compromise position with boohoo is close and could be reached in the coming days. If the Board were able to reach a compromise, this would avoid the expense, administrative burden and other detrimental consequences for the Company that would result from the General Meeting.
If this compromise position is not reached in the coming days, the Board will publish an announcement setting out its views on boohoo's proposed resolutions, the General Meeting, and the situation in which the Company has been placed
However make sure you vote against BOO resolutions....
They have issued an RNS
GM - sorry - Boohoo - IMO petty to say the least... childish even...
AGM -
Scooby if you do or did work for any financial services company or even as an IFA, your commentary is not that supported by a credible financial organisation,
I would love to see which part of your " training" taught you to comment on any company the way you do .
Let's see a document to support that ....