Member Info for Florida

Yes Twixy, your getting to be a cantankerous old git in you old age. Spending far too much time suffering the pleasures of Thailand no doubt. I have made a few mistakes over the last few years and many a thing said in jest that were slightly exaggerated, but never have I said something to deliberately mislead. In my search for the TW interview I did actually come across an interesting post. In fact it was your reply to me on the same day 11th Oct 2019 - "Yes, AR did say that. I say the benefit outweighs the cost and get it done yesterday!!!".

Sorry Bakky, "in July" was meant to indicate the approximate time the interview took place, not a prediction of when a listing might occur. In fact I think the chances of us being listed on the Nasdeq are far higher than us being taken over. Having said that, generally, companies in our growth position are usually ripe targets once break-even is surpassed. I may have said this before but the importance of break-even far outweighs the CE mark approval imo. I agree, the introduction of our products into the US market place alongside a Nasdeq listing would be an ideal opportunity to establish a countrywide presence.

Many of TW's videos have been deleted for one reason or another, so it's difficult to trace at the moment. What I do know, looking back at my post on the 11th Oct 2019 is definitely July, and AR said "if we list on the Nasdeq we would have a value of about £380m. At the time we had a capitalisation of about £85m.

If I remember correctly, the ongoing costs of listing were instrumental in holding them back.

In July.

It was in an interview with you know who, the one and only TW.

Adam Renaulds last year said a Nasdaq listing would increase our value four fold.

JAdams - I think you deserve some clarity regarding what seems to be a misunderstanding between us. It is apparent that you probably didn't quite get the jist of my sarcasm, a bit hard to take as my wife constantly reminds me. Having said that, a bit of sarcasm here and there helps to lighten up what is sometimes a very dull board. So to explain. My Bedlam comment was in fact a knock at those who requested helpful info, then completely ungrateful when it was freely given by both you and Pacman1. I was in fact paying homage to you both for being so generous. Somehow this was misinterpreted in some way as an insult to you both, not my intention at all. Although I don't agree with everything you both say, I do welcome your input/comments. I hope this helps.

That's interesting. Did you not see my post at 14:40?

Sorry, I thought I said "No disrespect to JAdam"

No disrespect to JAdam nad Pacman

Has there been a recent mass escape from Bedlam.

Sorcerer - Thanks for your earlier post and a good summing up of the present and future status of the company. Although I agree with some of Richies33 thoughts he has made clear that he is very much amongst the hit and miss group that are looking to make big gains from this Novacyt connection, no disrespect to Richie33. Whatever gains are made will be very welcome and an additional one or two million would definitely help to carry us through breakeven. Certainly not a bone breaking change to our bottom line. I know I've mentioned this before and I doubt if anyone actually grasped the importance of my point, but I am convinced that breakeven is a milestone hurdle to overcome before institutional auto trades recognise the PE Ratio. For the benefit of those that are thinking, what the hell is this a** talking about, please see my previous posts. This is most certainly a long term hold and I doubt very much if we see significant gains until September. Having said that, the word significant incorporates a wide spectrum, and Richie33 might just get his 35p by July.

By the way, we have been here a long time haven't we, and between us we probably have more invested here than most of the newbies put together. Best of luck.

I would suggest you ignore what I have posted at your peril.

Sorry about the spelling. Couldn't get anything to recognise Curjoled. I should have got a bit closer to Cajoled.

16:17 - Newtrade - LSE thread
"WHO KNOWS WHY THEY WOULD DO THIS. Bearing in mind how much mms are allowed to get away with on AIM. Plus I don't understand that they had to say significantly lower. The email address is on their website and I had a reply with in 20 minutes of sending it."

It is blatantly obvious that some sort of corrupt skulduggery was going on here and the company had openly admitted that as a fact. My point is if the company were curjuled into doing something they obviously did not want to do, "is it illegal"?

16:17 - Newtrade - LSE thread
"WHO KNOWS WHY THEY WOULD DO THIS. Bearing in mind how much mms are allowed to get away with on AIM. Plus I don't understand that they had to say significantly lower. The email address is on their website and I had a reply with in 20 minutes of sending it."

It is blatantly obvious that some sort of corupt sculduggery was going on here and the company had openly admitted that as a fact. My point is if the company were curjuled into doing somthing they obviously did not want to do, "is it illegal"?

Hi Twix, A bit off subject I know, but I feel it's important this is brought to light for all of us to know where we stand. This is a situation that took place with Valirx yesterday. Would appreciate your thoughts or anybody's thoughts for that matter.

1st May 2020 - Valirx (VAL)
Valirx had recently gone through a complete restructuring of its financial situation, including a consolidation of x125 and a placing for £200,000, leaving the company with 12m shares in issue at 0.01p and only 2m shares floating. Since then, the price had risen from 3p within two weeks of trading to a maximum of 23p on the 1st May. It was apparent from previous trading days that the MM's had run out of shares and were finding it difficult to stem the flow of buying and were struggling to keep control of the price. Every deramping troll was thrown at the threads, I counted at least 12 on one site alone, and the five broker sites I was keeping tabs on at the time all began to give false price and trade information.

At 07:00 on the 1st May the company announced an agreement with a Japanese compony to pursue the posibility of a Joint Venture, sending the price up 71%.

At 13:34 the company issued an RNS stement to the fact that they "might" seek further funding and take out a placing. Not that they would, or are going to take out a placing. The price dropped nearly 100% and left investors totally puzzled as to why a company seeking to finance their company would deliberately damage it's potential financing position by saying they might take out a placing. So I posted the following -

15:52 - Florida LSE - thread
"GeordieShores - Fred1eboy - Two interesting views on why this BOD who are seeking finance, would scupper the price of their own company, in tern, lowering the 30 day average that might be required to establish a placing price. If a nomad instructed them to do this I would strongly suggest that the Nomad must have a significant bias in some shape or form because there is no logical reason to force such an announcement before a placing is required. On the other hand, the normal practice for a company to comment on a major price improvement is to comment if there is no apparent reason for the increase, where in this case there is in the form of an RNS JV. Which leaves us with pressure brought to bare by the MM's. If this is the case, the BOD certainly have trust issues. I was fortunate to get out with a tidy profit. Unfortunately, many have been caught out here, unnecessarily imv"

Reply from Newtrade - Email from Valirx (Kevin Alexander)

15:58 - Newtrade - LSE thread
"This is the reply I got from Val just now re the RNS
Sorry. It was done at AIM Team’s insistence - nothing to do with the company. We did not want to do it. I believe they were worried that shareholders were buying shares without knowing about the company’s financial state - even though that was public. Again sorry you are disappointed - we are too."

See next post -

It probably is reportable. But where it gets you isn't anywhere worthwhile.

Newtrade - I may even come back in here at some point on the back of that reply.

At least the BOD have shown some dignity.