RE: I wonder whether we are involved in this.....15 Feb 2022 11:28
Mr hanji,
Intel doesn’t worry me, it excites me, in it’s purest form of course. The reasoning has many positive outcomes. Our work is valid and very relevant. On point. I have never doubted it.
One being, competition is healthy, it’s places healthy pressure on FG to deliver quicker, to be more open and transparent going forward, as investors will expect it, about their achievements when they announce details on a level basis as INTEL, emphasis on global marketing it out there, use twitter, gain an audience when they announce.
As Tripod would say, less cloak n dagger, more Mayweather. (alright the latter just rythmed...hahaha...) that was me.
Dwave could be a darkhorse with this SPAC Deal and Emil Michael pulling the strings now. There is a more in-depth article from 2020 regarding their chip making facility and on some occasions making chips for client, just not at mass level as TSCM (Taiwan chip co)is stated, this could now change and be the next plan under Emil to expand services, once INTEL have made their presentation, and spac approved. Emil has invested in coinbase and another coin to rival BTC publicly....i shared this already.
Some may have read this article from 2020 already.
With Argo and Block with Intel. FG would do little harm to state who we are in bed with, earlier than one had anticipated, upon agreement with chip maker?
Under Emil the SPACs ambition is to grow QBTS market TAM, from $1bn to $150bn, one avenue is through successful revenue from their current success with user progressive applications used by each clients for their specific business problem.
I.e from Re-occuring annual revenue once client is successful with the production processing (our end) using their services and middleware.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
