Interesting discussion re Solowow8 Jan 2023 17:15
I am a holder and bought in on the basis of (1) strong business fundamentals (supported by performance data) (2) excellent financial profile: debt free, decent cashflow, good dividend (3) Solowow stake....in that order.
Professional investors and analysts regualrly misunderstand how mucha business is worth to others in an industry, ans the market is littered with examples of analysts failing to asign proper worth to a business and then scrambling to change their analysis when predator pounces. The second point is that Solowow is an entrepreneur not a professional manager , so more like a Mike Ashley or Lord Hanson, so he will have 'gamed' most of the outcomes after calling for teh EGM. Bernie Ecclestone paid good money years ago to float idea of floating F1 only to shelve it once he has flushed out who among the F1 teams would oppose him...MSG have done just this by this move giving Solowow real time data on which the level of institutional support at current levels for management, and it hasnt cost him a pfenning as yet.
So on to the issue of does he sit there with current stake or go for broke. The calculus an entreprenuer looks at is likely to focus on if I wnat to enter the UK DIY tile market how much would it cost me to build a business from scratch and get a brand name. To build the retail and online distribution reach of Topps, to get access to the customer database & the business intelligence within the group; to start from scratch with suppliers; to buy sites etc...in effect to replicate Topps would take years, cost millions, and have no guarantee of success. So much easier to buy the whole show now whilst sp is trading at close to a 5 year low, after the current management team has done all the hard work!
Worries about overpaying fail to recgonise what he no doubt recognises that institutions will prefer cash bird in hand if price is calibrated correctly than promise of future jam from current management. So Solowow 'overpays' - does he care? Of course not, because he can sit on the business and do what he likes once he owns it. If he heavily incentivises key management to stay why wouldnt they- win win for them. And whats to stop Solowow expanding Topps and then at some future date when markets are booming relisting the whole show.