Member Info for exstatex

permission to disagree! let me guess- if someone got a hattrick you'd say they should have had four! A hattrick of producing wells What worries me is Aussies laughing at pommies, politely of course. Though i was lucky enough to be at the ground Headingly 1981! Have a feeling what with the high pressure and enormous quantity of oil it will flow alright. But if it flows for 30 years should it have been forty?? I must be ... to bother! Where's Doose?? (help!)

yes, the Dor Sp was 80p-100p before with just share of HH which soon gets going again and the oil price is high again - 2Facts! Now we also have Lidsey and Brockham and don't forget Kimmeridge production at both sites! If you don't like this you must be.... ATB for today. buying more

forgot to add this paragraph where it said, "Subsequent to the Company RNS 20 November 2017, the Company has completed its review of initial flow rates from Lidsey-X2. The installation of a new pump to optimise pressure differentials and maximize production flow rates will be completed in February 2018." If not meeting market expectations could cause a drop from 30p to 10p then let's see what meeting some more expectation could do to the SP, starting from this month. G

Extract from the 15-Jan-18 RNS: "The Company will re-commence production from the Portland Resevoir via the BR-X2Y well at Brockham in March, as well as the Great Oolite Resevoir at Lidsey from the Lidsey-X1 well this February. This, combined with existing production from the Lidsey-X2 well and expected production from the Brockham BR-X4Z well (see below), is expected to give the Company a total of four wells in production in Q1 2018." And today is 01-Feb-2018! GL everybody!

positive as ever! Feb was when Lidsey meant to be fixed with new pump so why gloom for another month- unless you like it?

enjoyed your posts ATB Generally speaking check ANGS for the newsflow upcoming

would be great if Russian State could agree compensation for original shareholders of about 6.5p/share taken as an average of their holdings on the day before the Mtonya 'disposal' RNS and say on a date a year before. Some of us went way beyond the call of duty to support the amazing discovery of an important new ISR project along the 36 km Mtonya corridor on behalf of hoping to make progress in the work to combat global warming . Some of us also don't wish to be boxed in by domestically sourced rhetoric which gives little credit to historical sacrifices or could be of much future usefulness. Thanks P.S this bb is still labelled Uranium Resources

very disappointing. 2003 when i had the slob from lack of intelligence blow smoke in my face If we had begun nuclear electric then we could have reduced air polution we breath and green house gasses bysay 50%. Russia for example is doing more for global warming by building nuclear power stations than we are. We are talking about our childrens future and health and security. �10m or less was all that the URA required to save it and prove up a magnificent resource along the 36km corridor which includes the Mtonya license at the end. Tax avoiders could pay �100/day while in GB or regularise themselves and bingo the state would have it. But our politicians will not tackle tax avoidance. Fox hunting more important! Is global warming less important than fox hunting?? ie absolute disgraceful waste of resources. And elite can't be bothered giving pay cuts post 2008. What did i want over my lifetime? answer -tackle global warming and give healthy life to many What do establishment want? answer- to delay everything unreasonably, to bailout property prices with austerity, to unreasonably restrict progress presumably aided by lack of intelligence organisations. For URA the last hope would be the Russian State fairly establishing the true value of the Mtonya corridor asi humbly requested them to do- our lot won't do it? Oil and arms dealing politics?? Again this more important than global warming????Oh sorry to offend the masonic bankers who are doing a fine impression of first world war generals perhaps!!! ie pay yourselves less and pony up for progress to such extent that you actually feel it!

no reply from Russian Gov. Hope original shareholders are compensated for the incredible world class ISR Uranium asset that was discovered unexpectedly.

a great pity listened to DL on this one then co produced lacklustre RNs's for years while others connected topped up. Worst case scenario. don't like co loans and remember them being written off before to clean book for rto

Lets think who's going to solve global warming issues? Tech advanced countries perhaps only ones can do it? But they give all money to bailout banks and big property owners after 2008 wiped out a generations wealth. Therefore time to possibly formally charge the masonic order with gross negligence against the long term security of our people or give the money back. Interesting in Jersey they pride themselves on being low carbon economy. How? - an undersea cable from a french nuclear power station! Who paid for that? Tax payers or tax avoiders? I can't believe one of possibly the cheapest sources of uranium has been halted for the lack of 10m pounds and our people are investing in Brighthouse . About sums it all up except for lack of establishment pay cuts when country was bankrupt. Then i suppose they all toddle off to church!!

Sadly we have Govs who give trillions to rescue big landlords, housing, construction and land banks/crown estates Sadly the above then don't give the money back Sadly only a £10m drop in this ocean was needed to prove up or rescue URA Sadly our politicians who didn't volunteer pay cuts in 2008 seem to work mostly for the people in the top line and not for the next generation or climate change reduction All very sad. To end up a shell to be kicked through the hands of god knows who Uranium Resources was better investment than refurb of house of commons. Not supporting it has cost us £425,000 A bit of advice for younger investors. When establishment say there is recession don't trust that they will do their best to extricate their people from it. Establishment en bloc refused pay cuts and refused invest substantially on own part. They took tax payer money to prop up their assets (austerity). Politicians, Councils, economists don't have any method to speed recoveries to a degree one would expect in 21C. Sadly some people use downturns as opportunities to re-invent the 18C! Also I don't think religions generally get it. I mean golden bricks of all nationalities/religions quite prepared to accept bailouts and none say ' no i'm rich, i can't take money from poor'. A decade after 2008 establishment IMO need to reflect that they didn't do their best and that they owe their nations a sum equivalent to half their property values (for the 90% bailout). This is owed to the infrastructure budget with interest at 4% from 2008. Owed to the reduction of climate change and for a fleet of modern power stations. All establishments,masons, religions, govs IMO need to own up to this in writing otherwise democracy is essentially a fraud. Merry Christmas

Sadly we have Govs who give trillions to rescue big landlords, housing, construction and land banks/crown estates Sadly the above then don't give the money back Sadly only a £10m drop in this ocean was needed to prove up or rescue URA Sadly our politicians who didn't volunteer pay cuts in 2008 seem to work mostly for the people in the top line and not for the next generation or climate change reduction All very sad. To end up a shell to be kicked through the hands of god knows who Uranium Resources was better investment than refurb of house of commons. Not supporting it has cost us £425,000 A bit of advice for younger investors. When establishment say there is recession don't trust that they will do their best to extricate their people from it. Establishment en bloc refused pay cuts and refused invest substantially on own part. They took tax payer money to prop up their assets (austerity). Politicians, Councils, economists don't have any method to speed recoveries to a degree one would expect in 21C. Sadly some people use downturns as opportunities to re-invent the 18C! Also I don't think religions generally get it. I mean golden bricks of all nationalities/religions quite prepared to accept bailouts and none say ' no i'm rich, i can't take money from poor'. A decade after 2008 establishment IMO need to reflect that they didn't do their best and that they owe their nations a sum equivalent to half their property values (for the 90% bailout). This is owed to the infrastructure budget with interest at 4% from 2008. Owed to the reduction of climate change and for a fleet of modern power stations. All establishments,masons, religions, govs IMO need to own up to this in writing otherwise democracy is essentially a fraud. Merry Christmas

Sadly we have Govs who give trillions to rescue big landlords, housing, construction and land banks/crown estates Sadly the above then don't give the money back Sadly only a £10m drop in this ocean was needed to prove up or rescue URA Sadly our politicians who didn't volunteer pay cuts in 2008 seem to work mostly for the people in the top line and not for the next generation or climate change reduction All very sad. To end up a shell to be kicked through the hands of god knows who

Tell them what they can do to get the oolite flowing then- something constructive!

http://www.uraniumresources.co.uk/downloads/20131205_URA%20presentation_Final.pdf see p 18 also note the Mkuju 100m lb surface deposit is uplifted tier 3 Which URA didn't calculate a resource from . This presentation used to be on the URA home page.

for Estes to take Mtonya from URA at this time IMO. The Mtonya license has just been extended for 4 years. The tiny 2m lb resource defined is a fraction of the 36km corridor which has 3 vertical tiers each with several roll front mineralisations. The 2013 presentation highlighted the similarity of Mtonya to the best and cheapest Uranium producing fields in the world in Kazakhstan. Previously the MD has intonated that Estes believed Mtonya was a billion dollar project. I have written to the Russian Gov. to question whether a correct and proper future value for Mtonya has been arrived at in the interest of shareholders. Most market watchers agree that the spot Uranium price must soon return to the $40-$50 range because of recent producer cuts and projected deficits in the market due massive Chinese, Indian and others NPP building programs. An ISR project like Mtonya will then be highly profitable. Next door Mkuju license sold for about $800m , I believe. So to value a possibly similar sized deposit but one extractable by the cheaper and more enviromentally friendly ISR method at $1m seems incredible...

sorry still a bit confused if the prospectus might have better said 'unable to pay dividends...until somethings clarified'

yes and unfortunately I had to sell at 1p which has been devastating for all here. too late to be more careful next time. interesting experience. galling in extreme that my family security may have gone to tax avoiders which is reason i pay so much IMO! DL went barmy when market was falling,everyone against him Aim,establishment, press, bankers, disappeared on holiday and returned saying allowed ramp his shares. Personally think delay in HH has been nothing short of criminal IMO and demonstrates the pattern that politicians have made a system that makes it impossible to get out of economic downturn quickly, and during this they will offer no personal pay cuts (except via long negotiation one presumes) but will increase taxes in a breath. There are lots of sectors who pretend to be British but who did nothing and definitely nothing with their own money. Even worse in some cases they asked for more from tax payer. It has been shocking to watch what seems like institutionalised cheating. Masons are definitely involved IMO because of their links to property and their general rigidity and blinkered assumptions. Therefore it would possibly be better if they were completely reformed!

I don't really agree Have watched it all pretty closely pre and post 2008 and i'm very confident that not enough was done pre or post and the effects of austerity could have been reduced by at least 25% minimum very simply. The simplest of all would have been establishment volunteered pay cuts post 2008. (judiciary missed a moral decision there!)(i recall one royal did- must have had a top class advisor) Have begun energy projects pre 2008 so paving way to cheaper energy for business and perhaps more efficient economy than competitors and/or better demand for gov bonds. Establishment or rich as you say take more interest in investment to create meaningful jobs and be prepared to put in substantially. Why not , life is very short. Increase tax take from multinationals very significantly and ignore much of their protests. There is always somebody else to supply and/or a new opportunity is so created for somebody else Big landlords could have been minimally bailed out. Any bail out they received seems not to have come back into investment in the new green economy we want. Close tax havens or otherwise increase the cost for such people if they own assets/shares etc here or use health services etc. I know some people invested everything they had and went without income in this difficult time so when we've seen people with huge assets give zero into the pot and still also ask for tax payer funds it seems wrong A Gov still should have capacity to call multinationals bluff and take on projects. You say multinationals do energy but Govs have to guarantee everything in sight it seems so maybe let smaller co.s do it according to more normal business arrangements? Austerity has been very hard so really i think there could have been much more sacrifices made to reduce it. 2008 was like a 'debt version of the 'blitz' but this time sadly the 'financial' rationing burden has not been shared so well if history is to be believed. limited by space like you say! Also i think it was someone like Richelieu who said he could condemn a man from six sentences. I've already had a slob from lack of intelligence blowing smoke in my face in 2003 but don't think that would happen now as been largely proved correct!! (and more British!)