Member Info for exstatex

Captain, i think everybody given up with you or you get them banned
Where do you dredge the Lidsey figure from?
Weald Oilers on twitter confirmed that donkeys still pumping but probably they thought faster so Lidsey is still producing about 190bbls/day from L1 and L2 .twitter.com/WealdOilers/status/1011513283071922176

not sure if SP will follow Angus or UKOG or will it matter!!

maybe 11 July meeting has been cancelled. Can't find something to be considered on that date? Meanwhile meter keeps running as to how this country pays off the debt from rescuing the big landlords at the expense of energy security and clean energy tech. i wpuld really like answers from some people to explain whose side they are on!!

could it be a mistake. Still says updated 21 jun while other pages are updated 26 jun

i don't think the latter poster is within the rules because they state guesses without using the words like maybe or perhaps and then claim some industry knowledge (always a red flag!) and then try and say IMO
To me thats blatant...

Churchill wouldn't be happy financial institutions are to blame for selling the gambling products and then they will not hesitate to use political influence to bail themselves out when it all goes wrong and screw the tax payer again like 2008 Lidsey kept the Spitfires in the air!

excuse me for asking a stupid question but if the esp were placed further down the pipe then could it not improve the flow from that part and somehow encourage a better flow to surface? Thanks

Yes i forgot about potential mad slurs. Lets try this Aberdeen Standard Investments, one of Persimmon's top investors with a 2.3 percent stake, voted against the 2017 pay report saying that the CEO pay concessions were "not even... close to acceptable". As i said detailed statements are required from the masonic club and Intelligence - see previous post The establishment didn't pull its weight post 2008 as i've stated before so they should explain Have you got a problem with this? It's quite funny what you say as the psychology profession has a problem with questioning authority, which of course is a massive problem if authority is putting the viability of its own assets above what would be better for the population and the economy Why not have a referendum about it??

The rational move in 2008 for country would have been to partially prop up the big landlords (and they suffer minimum 50% losses personally which they have to dig themselves out of) and then be able to spend on green energy infrastructure to power the GB 21C economy. The fact this didn't happen and the implied arrogance that the political system in something that can be swayed away from providing the best alternative for the prosperity and well being (security and access to economic possibilities) of the people needs to be examined very closely. It appears some in powerful places or authority believe that behaviour (using small minded small print of course) which has its roots in previous centuries is valid and acceptable now. Therefore a statement is needed from royalist masons as to why they support this? How much did they gain? Therefore a statement is needed from Intelligence as to why they support this? Chosen or forced? Please leave out references to god or royals to try to usurp credibility. Russia i notice is repairing the churches probably ? to be filled with downtrodden shoeless hoards who will never likely have access to any capital to combine to use their fine brains for good. How and in what ways is the behaviour of the former different? (extra Q)

sorry was busy. Fair comment absolutely ATB by the way the North Sea source rock is sometimes quoted to be the Kimmeridge so is it possible they have seen similar structures there?

Alan seems a lot of experts are expecting the Kimmeridge at Brockham to flow with oil and gas otherwise why would they install the turbines hooked up to the grid?

IMO things have gone wrong since 2008. There is no reason why big landlords shouldn't have had to sell half their properties to reduce austerity. There is no reason in 21C why country can't accelerate itself out of a recession by developing viable projects. The weald is one of these. Oh no but the landlords and banks property portfolios have to be rescued entirely! Austerity must be slow and painful like form another century. Academia can't get off its backside to do anything! Elite or MPs can't offer pay cuts to show they understand! Probably anyone suggesting they could have done A LOT better would be labelled a trouble maker after all they've got away with it for 10 years now Therefore it must have been in the interests of a powerful lobby of big landlords to influence the political system to ignore rational behaviour and attend to their financial needs. This is subverting democracy IMO. The royalist masons could be up to necks in this. Intelligence seems incapable of working it out. Reference housebuilder director windfalls if like. I would rather the big landlords had not been entirely rescued incl crown estate and GB had looked to providing cheap greener secure energy to its citizens for their precious diverse economy that with their ingenuity can solve any problem. Better than some hocus pocus masonic nonsense no doubt based on the very limited understanding of some very ancient people!

neither ,sorry Guv (not deferring to you of course!) ATB twitter.com/Killer___Clowns/status/999648058978816000 found this on weald Oilers twitter . No I didn't write it and don't know who did! Dor tends to mimic Angs SP although they don't have HH or IOW DL , solely from observation, will inform market at the best time

as Brent goes up so do revenues dramatically. Dor could easily get to �1m/year revenue and still HH to come

what is you feeling on whether councils should have invited private firms to invest capital in proving up oil for extraction IF in the next breath they will appear to be unprepared in lots of other ways. I thought PV did say they were installing an ESP? ATB

i don't think management deserve any wages yet considering what shareholders have suffered for years and bearing in mind the options management have awarded themselves with such a long date for take up

and all DL likes to say is 'i got my dividend'

absolutely right was referring to DL twitter pre RTO when OCT was hyped so much as money making machine including an imminent dividend but IMO it looked like the new management were not going to do this and the SP drifted and troll like posters came to bb and i had to sell to pay tax bill losing 1/4m amd my shares were bought by tax avoiders (i presume) with links to the company incl one said person himself. Facts are facts

A good question is which power bases are behind the implied arrogance of thinking anyone could pay themselves a bonus after being rescued by tax payer at expense of 21C investment in clean energy etc and pocket the bonuses and think they will get away with it? 1) A belief company self made rules equate to laws of land? 2) Support of royalist masons? 3) Crown estate offered nothing so that is lead to follow? 4) Laws might have to be changed to ensure payback but this will take time and can be lobbied against. 5) morally they believe they under no obligation to see big picture? Please add to the general discussion. Nobody will make you lose your job or anything. It's called tax payer feedback. My CGT went from 18% to 28% and i feel the state is not working to ensure it is not diverted into undeserving hands or is well spent (especially according to what people expect from 21C unless elite don't care about 21C?).

I think Angus drilling has been good. The plan is good. Cheap oil and cheap electricity. Another source of these for supply security. Jobs and skills and self esteem in community. Presumably councillors are paid by tax payer? The attitude of some was a bit like when bridge nearly finished they want to turn up at a meeting and be filled in about foundation stage ie they see no reason to be up to date. Then they like a bit of a discussion re what is a foundation, where does it stop etc I don't understand how 'date from which retrospective ' applies was not already defined at the meeting bearing in mind it was discussed months ago here?