Member Info for expatbrat

Still waiting for the information regarding the SAF mandate for 2025 onwards for Airlines. Or could it be just nonsense that has been fabricated to ramp a share price?

That’s a terrible video. I’ve watched it several times and every time I do I cringe. It really doesn’t surprise me that VLS struggles to attract decent investment. The City boys must wheel this out time after time.

Shoe on the other foot now IM? Enough of the ramping. Let’s keep to the facts and not make stuff up shall we. Then at least new comers have a shot at learning about VLS (the positives and the negatives) before jumping in or avoiding.

Just as a refresher of your statement Sean:

Quote “ Every last drop of it will be in high demand as from 2025 onwards there are large financial penalties for any airline not using at least 10% SAF.”

What is the source of your information?

Well that pretty much sums it up Sean. But hypocritical of you to slam me when you’re fabricating information that is untrue, to entice people to buy the stock.

Ill given you one more chance so I’ll ask you again,

I cannot find any reference to such airline penalties for not using SAF from 2025. Can you pleas enlighten?

I’m just keen to know where these facts about a 2025 mandate come from. As you know, I like my facts and such a requirement for airlines to use SAF or face penalties, is a good catalyst.
I look forward to seeing the source of the info Sean.

Sean. I cannot find any reference to such airline penalties for not using SAF from 2025. Can you pleas enlighten?

Hahah! Have you actually seen some of the previous targets by the brokers and how massively wide of the mark they were? Utter nonsense.

Unproven process. No demo scale facility. Failed to follow the correct pathway to successful project financing.

The placing was oversubscribed because the pricing was set considerably lower than the spike to 16p that happens only a short time prior. Investors thought they were getting a bargain. Here we are approaching share issue price. Let see how close to 5p we get....

More posts from worried investors, who are starting to see the wood for the trees.
This stock will drift down without (good) news. Fact.

I think it’ll continue to drift down. No reason for it to rise as pretty much everything that can be done to bouy the price has happened already. Only a surprise announcement can help this one now.

Please get your facts right before trying to use them. PP was granted yes, however not in the fashion it was originally submitted. I said it wouldn’t be granted and it wasn’t. It then changed and it was. That’s a fact.

£20m of YOUR money in their bank. Pocket change from BA and Shell and pocket lint from HMG.

The much lauded AltAlto agreement - came and went.

Mississippi still attracting tumble weed. The list goes on.
Trade the news.

Thurg, I wouldn’t necessarily say my posts (and others) are negative. They are fact based. If the facts don’t gel with your vision of what VlS will look like going forward, then I’m sorry about that.
I’ve said all along that BA and Shell are in this for punt/PR money and given how much time has passed, the need for VLS to seek alternative methods of funding, reinforces my beliefs.
Just think about VLS for a second. It is made up of highly paid (some very highly paid) executives, who have a piece of tech that they have been trying to flog for years, unsuccessfully. They’ve now resorted to being a hot shot renewable fuels company, trying to build over a billion dollars worth of projects, without any prior experience, meanwhile expecting shareholders to pay them handsomely. It’s not actually a business, it’s more of a consultancy company, without any clients.

However. In the current climate, with continued and increased focus on the environment, Vls has the potential to continue its practices, despite the long term probability of pulling off a project as being slim to none (imho), to spike on news and drift around and provide entries and exits for those willing to punt.

Wrong fact.

The right fact: The entire waste to fuels process has not been demonstrated.

Poor rebuttal SB!
Do you honestly think that the onboarding of a strategic would not result in an sp rise?!? I’d say that’s a fact.
Same goes for the FEED. As usual, more hot air from you.

Facts. Facts. Facts. That’s all they are SB. There’s also only so many times you can flog the same story. We need material developments to justify any movement in the sp. What would also be of value would be some idea of how they plan to finance a project that has not been previously demonstrated at any scale.

Turd. It was a comment in relation to news and the fact that positive, sp moving news we’ve been expected, came and went. It’s has done its dough, unless something unexpected comes along. Also, not all contributors are as well informed, unbiased, fact and technology competent as your good self.....

I don’t foresee any sexy news for a while. Planning Permission gained, sufficient funding completed, JetZero announced, Mississippi still treading water. There might be another tranche from the Dept Transport but I see little value in this now, as the news moving hype surrounding Gov funding has had its day imho.
Material progress needs to be made with the FEED and this will take time. BA and Shell might leave this one to run now until FEED is done, as the recent fund raise should cover the costs (assuming VLS dont award themselves large bonuses). A catalyst for a huge rise would be the oboarding of a strategic investor (not VC or fund) that can bring some real value to this company and not the pocket change handed over by BA/Shell.

I'm sorry you are wrong about this individual and their motives...I think he has talked many into buying their shares at inflated prices by his lies and manipulation. He needs to get called out on that and not allowed to escape under the pretence of easy mistakes.