RE: Another decision23 Feb 2021 22:57
This is the part of interest:
Note that downloading the PDF and translating helps readability as some parts are bold and my interpretation is it's basically statement (bold) and response from judiciary (non bold):
----Statement from lawyers----
7) Pages 17,969 / 17,970 (Sergio Firmo Sociedade de Advogados requiresupdate on the finalization of the Agreement between Recuperanda and Sindicato dos Bancos, underpenalty of convolution of bankruptcy judicial reorganization; Fls. 18.004 / 18.043: LimaGonçalves, Jambor, Rotenberg and Silveira Bueno Advogados informs that it sent the data bank accounts and requires the Respondent's summons to present the Agreement signed with the Banks' Union; Fls. 17,975 / 17,999 (AJ joins Judgment given in the interlocutory appealInstrument No. 2199480-27.2020.8.26.0000, maintaining the decision that authorized the sale of theiron ore):
----Response from Judiciary----
Tell the Respondent about the finalization of the Agreement and the beginning of the sale of the iron ore and depositing the amount in a judicial account.
-----
I don't think there is anything major revealed here, we are still all waiting to hear that the bank agreement is finialised.