Today's numbers29 Mar 2021 22:47
Volume
LES bough + sold summary = 38,949, 803 (This is wrong as per usual)
LSE L2 = 44,024,276 ( this is wrong, meaning there are still some 3m shares not yet reported, explained below)
London Stock Exchange = 47,103, 193 ( This is spot on. London stock exchange does not include negative trades/figures.
In other words, CFD shorts).
Volume using my calculation = 47,681,693 (add all the trades printed today , including CFDs but not the negative figures)
Difference between my total and the London Stock Exchange one is : 578,500
47,681,693 - 47,103,193 = 578,500
578,500 is the total number of trades with negative figures or CFD shorts ( - ) NOTE, i can't be certain , some may be longs too. Add the below and you get 578,500
@29.5 -35,000
@33.699 -43,500
@33.751 -100,000
@30.5 -200,000
@30 -200,000
If we see any CFD shorts reported tomorrow, it will likely come from the above figures. Esp the 200,000 as it was opened and sold with in 30 minutes - see below
29-Mar-21 15:34:57 30.5 -200,000 Buy* 29.5 30 -61.00k O
29-Mar-21 15:05:22 30 -200,000 Sell* 30 30.5 -60.00k O
NOW - check out the total numbers of bought v sold today. Evidence of manipulation
Total bought today = 29,611,795
Total sold today = 16,330,877
Total 'unknown' = 1,739,021 ( price struck at mid point and hence printed as unknown but more likely to be buys and not sells). Buys are 2 - 1 v sells but we only go up 3% ???? ffs
The bough and sold figures on LSE is very often wrong. same again today and here it is fyi....:
Bought = 18,761,905
Sold = 14,912,896
Does not report unknown trades.
MISSING TRADES: 47,103,193 - 44,024,276 = 3,078, 917
3,078, 917 shares not reported! These are likely to be printed at some point tomorrow. MMs often keep large trades and print them the next day. All part of their manipulation.
Now as yourself, should we be only 3% up???? Can you all see the demand for the stock? Can you see shares going from PIs to IIs? Can you now see we are clearly being manipulated? The derampers call us all sort of names for pointing this out.
GLA