RE: Conversion notice6 Apr 2024 00:28
Hi Bazzaman, I appreciate your feedback and have endeavoured to maintain an impartial tone, minimizing emotional expression as it is not characteristic of my approach; it's not who I am. I do my best to respect the readers' perspective, which is essential, upholding a duty to remain objective. I believe I do this for the most part. Regarding the CB funding issue, I expressed my concerns about its perceived high cost and the implications of the conversion price, aiming for a balanced critique. I cannot see how you could not draw this conclusion, even with a respectful tone.
I must clarify that adopting a confrontational stance towards the board contradicts my principles; I find this type of conduct leaves readers open to alleging I am allowing my ego to play a role. I believe it to others, as it does not align with my professional ethos.
Regarding TW's comments, if you are referring to the twin bearcasts released today, I chose not to listen to either. My decision to disengage from TW's commentary on SBTX is final, out of respect for his expressed desire to cease mutual criticisms.
While my attempts at humour may occasionally be misconstrued as contentious, it has not been my intention. I hold TW in high regard and respect his perspectives, yet I feel his critique of SBTX may have exceeded reasonable bounds. This is not to dismiss some of his valid points, with which I concur to an extent. However, the persistent and intense scrutiny has become overwhelming, impacting my well-being and leading me to conclude my involvement in this discourse, which had become heated at times by both parties. Furthermore, I feel TW integrity is questioned when it should not. I believe him to be honest in terms that he does not use his influence to pickpocket investors. I could go into great detail regarding what bothers me. Hellfire; I could write a book. I might!
Regarding the remaining CB, I must exercise caution, as any speculation on this topic could be misreported to the NOMAD again. Speculating on a significant subject with limited information and permutations could lead to unintended consequences. I previously issued a warning due to a speculative remark, which was misunderstood as a double bluff. Therefore, I choose not to provide further speculation on the remaining CB at this time. Speculating serves no purpose.
I'd prefer you email me in future, or ask awkward questions via the Substack portal.