RE: Bearcast2 Jun 2024 12:37
A key factor overlooking the EV/Revenue multiple for healthcare products is around 19.09. Using this "industry standard" implies that SBTX acquired Dermatonics inexpensively, especially when factoring in UMG passive revenues, which could match Dermatonics in a year or so. Okay, this may seem absurd when you analyse the numbers, but a comprehensive database breaks this down, sector by sector. I received two models over the weekend. I might use them for amusement because, while we can debate about the multiple figures used, everyone has thus far missed the premise.
At this stage, I guess I should not use the word cheaply with Dermatonics until we have a final dilutive figure after the conclusion of the CBs, which is a matter of public record and not privately communicated with the aggitater.
On the latest bearcast, SA is once again slaughtered. I question the motive and integrity of the investor communicating with SA. If I were SA, I would refer all communications from investors to IR and keep a distance from people who do not respect the privacy of private communication because, as was demonstrated, they can be abused and weaponised. I guess whomever the investor is, he is back from jury service in NY.