RE: Trouble Makers12 Jan 2024 16:34
So Nick1978 comes clean. The job is done, do you think, Nick? This what you imply.
You are a disingenuous blaggard. You try to claim you made a single enquiry to Chiles when we can all read your history here on LSE. It is not an isolated event, period! You have run a campaign against me for three years, going back to the guild, to which, as of today, you remain the only person to be kicked out. FYI, I hated myself for doing so because it goes against what I believe we all have a right to, free speech, but you abused it. If I am honest, I do not believe you begrudge paying a subscription; the campaign against me has been very personal for you, and we can all see this. SP/TW is collateral damage, as will Cavendish if TW gets his claws out. I am sure Oleric has played his part also, but you, Nick, shame on you. TW's SP has become collateral damage in part because of your vengeful nature and, in part, Chile's ignorance of what are AIM regulations and the best interests of the Companies he represents as the sherpa of aim rules.
Your petty conduct has created a firestorm that detracts from SBTX's work. No AIM regs were breached. Yet, somehow, despite your claims, you "do not look, listen or read any output from the sites in question."; you seem to know rather a lot. Obviously, there is a slight change to your historical claims where "anymore" implies a recent grievance to the November podcast, when before this, you maintained that you had no interest in any of our input. Yet another example of your disingenuous nature.
You have Gaul to whine about the right to reply on a platform you detest!
Don't bother replying to my eyes; I will be applying the filter again. You will be seated next to Oleric in the filter bin. My job is done here.