Member Info for Eloro

Doesn't surprise me. We have a buffoon in charge and we are witnessing the outcome of his best efforts to grow shareholders value😔

Events will unfold in the fullness of time Add. The question is whether solg will be able to survive that long being miss-managed by the buffoon?

I note that some posters dismissed the post regarding Barrick, or Barrack as the poster called them. The suggestion is not without merit. I regard Barrick as a maverick company who boldly goes where others fear to trod as demonstrated by their presence in Pa-kistan, and their punt on Hercules Silver demonstrated. I would be happy should Barrick make a bid here.

No point whinging about Solg management now. Investors had the opportunity to boot them out like I advocated, and most of you voted them back in. I was slammed for calling for our buffoon ceo to be booted. Indeed, the ramping for Scott The Rocks Caldwell was 9 on the Richter ramping scale!! It saddened me to think that we will be here for the next 2 to 4 years with no steps forward!

HereforHemo was pretty bullish on solg in the past, and recently he posted:

"Personally I took my money out with a profit at 10.4. That's because as I said NOTHING will happen here until Cascabel I'd fully derisked. And that will take at least a year from now. I'll look to get back in Q4 2025 and my guess would be around the same price as today. If I am wrong, good luck to those holding."

Our resident Bedlamite also posted about selling some and one could not find a more rampier ramper than Mad Jack. Hence, here are 2 people for whom the glitter no longer shine as it did before for solg.

Scott came on board spouting off, now he is doing the very things he spouted off about. That's why I don't hold him in high regard. A capable, intelligent CEO would first understand the positives and the negatives of his/her company so that they can put together a plan to turn things around before spouting off. That's why he is a buffoon who I have no confidence in. We are now reduced to "hoping" rather than having confidence in the leadership team.

I fear that in 12 to 18 months we will be no further along. I noticed that some folks who were positive have been quietly selling. Clearly they have lost confidence that anything positive will happen here.

Scott is not in a rush because whatever happens, he is getting paid.

Rich, I share your frustration. However, even I can see that if there was something intrinsically awry at Cascabel, the FN/Osisko DD would have flagged it and the streaming deal would not have gone ahead.

You are being disingenuous Mad Jack. You held a meeting with Scott, then proceeded to accuse him of hiding information which should be released to the market. It's the way you went about it. Very unprofessional, given that you claimed to be a business person. One thing everyone here agree on, you need psychiatric intervention. You do not conduct yourself as someone who is firing on all cylinders.

Red, in the absence of tangible facts, I am inclined to believe that the SP is being held back. Especially if there are shares placed to prevent the SP from finding its true value. I am also inclined to believe that there are more going on in the background than we know. Why else would there been no concerted effort made to address the falling SP? I am just guessing of course.

The current price has stopped people selling and there must be a reason for that.

Reluctantly, I have to agree with Mad Jack re that the SP is being held back. I got the impression that it has been a deliberate strategy to lock people in, dissuade people from selling by crashing the SP value. God only knows why the buffoon ceo picked such a low price!! I don't know how he can talk about shareholders value with a straight face.

Thank God that I am not a Bedlamite like you Jack!!

You are a Malkavian of the highest order. Your issues caused the company to stop communicating with you. Now you are seeing every poster here as their goons. Poor lad, for you mum's sake, you have my deepest sympathies.

Sorry Highflyigman, turnkey project status is so vague and ambiguous. So it's finally at turnkey status, what next? Does it just sits there looking pretty with its turnkey badge, or does he sell it, or take it to production? Being turnkey doesn't answer what the next step will be. Given that it's Scott, we could sit for another 4 years waiting while being turnkey. You know, like the Miss Havisham of mining😆

Re cutting my loses, I don't need the money at present. So I might as well leave as is rather than lock in my loses and then spend months on the sofa.

I do like a flutter, and this is a pretty big gamble which I have to stick around to see the outcome. Will it be Quady's proction, or 1984 sale? Perhaps the bookies should set up a pot😆

Plus, I would be asked why I am here if I don't hold the shares!

Add, I have cut him a lot of slack. You will note that I didn't post that he should be booted and replaced with someone more capable😆

That's me at my most generous and lenient!

Monte, I agree that the streaming deal has forced deliverables to a schedule on our leadership. However, don't underestimate Scott's ability to muck things up, fumble, drop the ball, and lose the match.

I will admit that I am still not 100% clear where we are heading. Sale or production? It's not clear to me what Scott's endgame is should he achieve the planned deliverables.

Add, believe me, if I could dump this share at break even, I would have done do long ago. Every day I rue not selling at 40p at a tidy profit. Instead, I held believing that this will be sold. After all, it's a reputed tier 1! I would be sleeping on the sofa for a long time if I sold now and take a significant hair cut. It never dawned on me that the Canadian leadership would be so useless! I worked in Canada for approximately 13 years and in the tech sector, the management are first class people. But, listening to Warren, the mining sector there is filled with scammers. Even Warren has given up hope which must be awful given that he is an asset manager. I have 3 young sons, I can envisage them inheriting my shares. Hopefully we won't be wiped out by a reverse split which North Americans love to do.

Come now Metooooo, we need to have a ceo with vision, get-up-&-go, and the ability to plan, execute and deliver. We just have to accept that we will be here for the next 2 to 4 year with slim hope of an outcome.

Add, this time I will wait until June 2025 before I start my campaign. Given the outcome of the agm, I will give Scott 6 months to either prove me wrong, or have you join my campaign because he failed. 6 months it is then.

I do hope so Metooooo. It would be a win just to get my money back.

Would anyone like to hazard a guess how much longer we will be waiting before something meaningful happens? 2026 or 2028?

Derisking to eternity!

Cheers Add, a logical summary.

Given the continuity endorsed by the agm results, I will keep an open mind and observe how events unfold. I agree with you that streaming deal defined the milestones which must be met and presents a yardstick against which progress can be measured.

BHP are a disappointment. Business should transcend personal animosity.