Member Info for Ella10

Hi MH,
From what I've found there appears to be 2 definitions of conductance. One is what I would have previously assumed related to standard electronics and another related to geophysics. Thickness of the conductor definitely plays a role. I'm still trying to understand a Iot of the data we are given and quite happy to be corrected order to improve my understanding. I'm definitely not saying my understanding is correct.

1. n. [Geophysics]

The product of conductivity and thickness, typically measured in units of siemens (S). In the inversion of electrical and electromagnetic measurements, the conductance of a layer or zone is usually much better determined than either the conductivity or thickness individually.

2. n. [Geophysics]

The reciprocal of resistance in a direct current circuit, measured in siemens (formerly mhos). In an alternating current circuit, conductance is the resistance divided by the square of impedance, also measured in siemens

Thanks MH,
I am not claiming to be a geophysics expert. A 17:40 in the following video Jeremy states the conductance is conductivity times thickness and this agree with other digging around have done. I wouldn't be surprised if the surface area has an impact and I think the margin for error is large which is not surprising given that we are trying to measure conductance through several layers of the earth.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OqhkC0nHetc

Interesting Stout - St George seem to have some huge conductance readings. As far as I can see their assay results returned over 11m of sulphides so if I'm correct the average conductivity of MAD199 conductor was in the region of 1,700 S/m .
https://www.australianmining.com.au/news/st-george-confirms-large-mineral-system-at-mt-alexander/
In the presentation Jeremy and Ben did it looks like KAV are assuming a conductor depth in the region of 40-50m.

I may be misunderstanding this but somewhere in the webinar I'm pretty sure Quinton talks about the dip of Ascot being in the opposite direction to Racecourse and hence being a mirror image. I got the impression that they therefore expected the mineralised zones to also be mirror images. Is hole 35 not on the west of the Ascot IP anomaly (the IP anomaly itself being to the SE of Racecourse)?

Apart from their ARCM shareholding is there another tenuous link between Remy and our two major shareholders?

Apparently this is a Swedish teachers pension fund. 9th Dec ARC's shareholder page was updated and these guys apparently own 5% of ARC. I wonder are these pension funds regulated....

Best of luck Peggy.

So the tweet yesterday was a bit naughty.
MH in a previous interview I'm pretty sure Ben mentioned a resin casing but said resin wasn't the word he was looking for. I suspect he meant a composite casing. I assume if this is available it probably requires different drill fittings if not a different drill so it may have been considered not feasible for this campaign. Pure speculation on my part.

Has anyone got a link for when the drill team stop for Christmas?

The last time we were drilling there was a rush to release news prior to the shift changes for the drill team. Christmas break will be similar. Whether we have found a non commercial conductor, found a commercial grade conductor or have got to target depth but believe the conductor is deeper would all be price sensitive news that would require an RNS.

This time next year Remy..

Pah! I was hoping for copper, nickel or gold with a few PGMs thrown in for free. I'm not sure what a coulis resource is worth?

I want to know what is in the red layers and how thick they are?

Oiltap keep up! Apparently I am now Sylvia Vrska. :-)

Hmmm - Thanks!! Not quite what I was looking for. Any chance you can find me one from one of our licence areas in the KCB?

Any chance of a picture of some chalcopyrite as an early Christmas present?

Hi Teaye,
I just find the apparent ignorance on this board astounding. Look how much folk have posted about Kalumbila on this board in the past year. Read the history and you may understand my post about this board turning green :-).

Hi Teaye,
Arcm are absolutely desperate to get a discovery that might be considered Kalumbila's little sister (Listen to Nov 202p crux interview or read this board). Read Kalumbila history and repost your modesty comment as you see fit.

The tweet implies that we aren't getting either assays that would confirm a discovery or news of massive sulphides containing significant visible copper or something else. I agree hindsight is great but a bit more care with the tweets would not do any harm.
Anyone who has been on the same shares as I post on will have observed that I tend to post my views be they good, bad or indifferent and that is unlikely to change.

If that tweet is communicating what it appears then it is market sensitive info. I cannot believe the they would tweet the implication that 2021 exploration has not resulted in a discovery hole. The tweet seems a bit shoddy.

Some folk never learn...
We might get news of JV before the end of 2022 but the chances don't seem that great.
I see from today's RNS that the CASA expectations have changed and I suspect even the downgraded expectations will not be met near term.
I said months ago that the reason we hadn't news of drilling was likely to be that the licence disputes were preventing it.
Capgrowth with your intuition and lack of understanding you must make an absolute fortune on aim (NOT)!!