RE: Proposed amendments and shareholders resolution21 May 2025 10:07
Proposed amendments to resolutions and additional shareholders resolution
Alba Mineral Resources plc AGM 27 May 2025
Dear fellow shareholders
As a long term holder I have felt unable this year to support all of the resolutions proposed by the board for ratification at the 2025 Annual General Meeting.
I acknowledge the necessity for capital raising in the coming year. My estimate is that we would need about £1.3 million to satisfactorily proceed with the programme outlined in the chairman's statement in the latest annual report. However, I cannot ignore the fact that the share price is approximately 10% of what it was at the time of the GROC spin off. I acknowledge that the market's judgement of the company's achievements is rather stern, albeit taking into account the impairment of Horse Hill project. Nevertheless considerable progress has been made at the mine, although the break in blasting is disappointing, I fully expect that over the coming months sufficient exploration can be made at Llechfraith to form the basis of an internal economic assessment. I would not wish to starve that process of resources. Indeed , I would prefer it to be the main focus of the business. I objected to the acquisition of the new Sweden projects, however, that is not on the basis of their prospective quality, simply the right prospects at the wrong time. Nevertheless, we are where we are and the earn in costs are not overly onerous, however I am concerned at the cash position and the recent placings conducted at a very low share price. I am confident that the anticipated imminent positive news flow from GROC may appreciate the ALBA shareprice, where upon the cost of placings to existing shareholders will be easier to bear.
Past resolutions granting the board of directors the authority to allot shares and to do to pre-emptively have had limits of time (1 year) and limits on quantity. I understand that with the likely reorganisation of the share capital that stipulating the number of shares authorised would be unhelpful at this stage, so I propose a limit based on the percentage of market capitalisation. So that if the share price rises, then a greater amount of shares can be raised. I believe that this brings a balance and aligns the interests of long term shareholders interests with the need for sufficient financial resources to unlock and bring closer to realisation the value of our current investments.
I wish to propose a resolution 9, which seeks to restrict the purchase of new projects, other than those we already have (including the Swedish projects). This is not an indefinite moratorium, it's for a maximum of a year, however, if ALBA's market capitalisation appreciates to a steady £5m, then the restriction would be lifted. It is my belief that this brings balance between immediate focus on Clogau St Davids and the longer term need for a pipeline of projects with various maturity timescales.
I thank you all for taking the