RE: MC being interviewes20 Oct 2022 20:56
Well obviously that depends on the price. I think what you really mean is that we wouldn't get the price we would like at the current time, which may or may not be true. Crucially though, I think there's very little chance of MC and JM agreeing to sell at a price which most of us wouldn't be quite happy with. Due to the number of shares they hold, I reckon a hostile takeover attempt would be an up-hill battle to get the votes, and I don't think there are many hostile takovers compared to friendly ones anyway - too many potential stumbling blocks - just look at Elon Musk and Twitter! So I think we can effectively rule out a low-ball takeover. Just can't see it happening, and all the more so now JM is chairman.
So if we rule out a low-ball takeover, the question really becomes will there be a takeover or not? My feeling is that majors are not looking at the here and now - they're more interested in the future. These companies have been around many decades and plan to be around for many decades to come, and for that, you need a bit of foresight and forward planning. Yes the gold price is down right now, yes miner share prices are in the crapper, and yes some other miners are already producing. But precisely none of those factors may be at all relevent in just two short years - years that may seem like a long time in some ways to us PIs, but also in many ways, will fly past, for us personally, and certainly for a major that understands very well just how long it can take to discover and develop a viable resource. And then after those two years have passed what they're left with is a multi-million oz deposit, that is hugely profitable at the current gold price, never mind if the long-hoped for higher gold prices materialise.
To make a good deal, both sides need to benefit. Pay a fair price now without trying to pinch pennies or screw anyone over, and in return you get a money machine that'll last decades. Everyone wins.