Member Info for Ecologist

Agree with you 100% Shuma. My take is that if you (plural) do not like silly or insulting comments, then block the person(s) concerned. Every share has its resident muppet or two, and just sometimes they serve a needed role. Once upon a time when Tullow was flying at over £10, there was a certain MisterX who threw out warning after warning and the baying crowd chewed him up. See where Tullow are today.

Our muppet is not serving the same role as despite the continual negative statements, there never seems any facts to back up his/her statements. This is no MisterX..

I just tried a quote for £500 on ii and was quoted at 12.49 ... right at the top of the spread. So it is possible to buy.

Barder's revenge during his last day in the office?

Finally Barder gets the heave-ho. Good news.

But the real sign of shareholder frustration comes in the second para where Duggan's cv is summarised: "During his tenure, the company (Alliance Pharmaceuticals) was ... sold at a substantial premium ..." Guess where we are heading?

Gaslady: Reliant Robin? Doesn't Mr Bean drive a mini?

RoJo, thanks for always giving me a laugh when I read your posts. Are they spontaneous or do you have to work at the funny lines

You probably wrote a version of what most of us were thinking! For years this company has only gone one way (remember the plan to burn subsea coal and extract the gas?) Our investment funds have mirrored the company. This is a typical AIM share: lots of rhetoric and promises and an inept BoD. Pensacola really took the biscuit . When I read the chairman speaking of "headwinds" I know he has nothing better to say. But I suppose we should be grateful to come out of this with our socks on.

Only £137k raised out of the 500k on offer. Where did all our RaRa girls and boys on this and several other sites go? Showing that hot air and not much else is the order of the day. For the record, yes I did top up in the WRAP. Anyone else here?

A rather different rns this morning from that of wednesday. Now we are told that "the company reserves the right to extend and/or increase the WRAP retail offer". So any scale back should be minimal if any. Also interesting is the little hint that the company would prefer that we invest via WRAP than purchases in the market so as to provide more cash to the company.

Will be interesting to see the level of support provide by retail investors for the WRAP offer come Friday evening. Although the amount on offer seems to be up to £500k, the rns is a bit confusing in exactly how much it wishes to raise, saying "does not exceed £500k, or such size as agreed by the company". (Whoever wrote that bit would be better in politics than the legal business!). For the record, I have thrown my cash into the hat via ii and am convinced that retail subscribers will be scaled back.

I was invested in Cove at the time that they put themselves up for auction and just let the bids come in. In the early days there was lots of different companies interested but at the end there were only two or three who would not give up. I think it was Malaysia that eventually bought the wining ticket. Great for shareholders, I multibagged on that one.

Not too big a surprise but galling nonetheless. Over-expansion killed the golden goose.

Very disappointing for FY25

Spot on Cheeky. 634 tons in fact. I'm sure there will be a knee jerk mark down for missing revenue figures (due to a slightly delayed shipment) but that would be a buying opportunity. Chugging forward, not exciting but solid company.

Does anyone have any idea what is the basis of today's announcement? Saba holds no interest in this trust but promises not to be difficult.

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/BRWM/agreement-with-saba/16863479

I'm not so sure Ben. Look how the flag carrying airlines were Johnny-come-Latelies to the budget airline business, and they have been playing catch up ever since. I agree with Chancers ... only a matter of time that one of the big ones go for Wise..

Gerihatrick, I am referring to the rns of this morning. Several silly errors. But no, I have not edited the entire rns. A simple read, though, throws up several errors. One sentence by SRT himself was obviously corrected but surplus words not removed, there is a double sentence by the chairman (beware of copy/pastes), etc.

For the PR side of things, I wish they would use a competent editor to correct their reports. The latest contained so many errors. Simply not professional enough. (Come to think of it, if SRT wants to send them to me 24 hours early, I'll do the editing for free!)

Hardboy I did the same as you but I can understand what CJ66 means. We were not treated in the same way as the big boys. In their placing, they received all they wanted but we were drastically scaled back. But then that is standard treatment of the little guys and not just by SRT.

Panman, thx for posting the interview. Agreed, there is a bit of a muddle when he moves from cubic feet to cubic metres (about 35 cubic feet = 1 cubic metre) but my take is that we are in line for 15% of half a million M3 per day that is entering the grid during flow testing. And what is better, the economies were based on €31 per megawat hour while the future market is trading at €42 ... a whopping 30% over the top.

Yes, a Cubic metre per day is the same measure in Italy as it is in Spain.

One little correction to your statement, it is not 'their' cash but 'ours'! All looking very nice isn't it?