RE: FINAL PRODUCT PURITY14 Dec 2024 18:12
So John,
Having had a second read myself, of the RNS as no official data sheets it's pretty much going like this,in a no expert explanation.
We have successfully separated 95% of the mineral, but only 13% of the Iron Oxide.
We have yet to define through testing the purity condition the 95% separated minerals will end up at, which is the key for this. Their hopeful plan of bringing high grade high purity Anatase still in its testing phase.
The tests are varying, as it also seems they are looking to recover higher content of the gaunge materials and better percentage from the 13% iron oxide. They I gather, see this as also marketable and would want a flow chart that recovers both in good quantities.
So further testing will be to suit those requirements.
Silverpixel posted a link to a company recently, the video had a brief outly of the processes current, comparison to theirs, so it's worth a look see what we are up against, as purity levels through this type of testing, industry wide is low, 20%, purity would be considered high in today's standard. So anything above that, quids in I don't assume we will get 95% purity, which is another key element the process used in Silverpixel content. But theirs is patented, and creating a 95%, purity powder. But you would have to view it, to get the jist.
This is by no means taken on face value, I'm an Engineer by trade but I can read well enough, but I'd be happy for someone to have a better understanding, tell me if I'm got something wrong, or something I've missed.
Thanks