Member Info for Dustyslay

Ten Bag Tag, what kind of name is that? Have you ever ten bagged? Or only picked up a Ten Bag?

Gona start calling you Zero Bags Nob

Haha, who is this Adw Doc? Got some right stoners in here, maybe im his Clone mate?

Get a grip, stop chatting 💩

Dinger,

"The recoverable estimate was later raised to 60 million barrels and now it’s currently $84 a barrel"

Ok, fully retrievable over its lifetime, so ye probably roughly 25 thousand inventory currently and growing

Also, id like to revisit or at least be pointed to the Direction of this "60 million " barrels. I had a hazard at about 25.000 ish in inventory, so im happy to be wrong obviously but where can I find that 60 million

Just trying to weigh up the general consensus here, clearly some of the Diehards are shouting from the rooftops without really much substance, but some very good informative posts to lead from today. Clearly a lot history and some failed promises that are being touted by the pessimistic types, some validated but some through a bitter lense (understandable) but like all stocks its about the current landscape, so sitting on 60 million barrels on the border to an already previous contractual agreement partner pending a new, updated 2026 agreement which given the circumstances will be moved up on the list of priority. Not looked into the Renewables side of the company, that can wait as this seems a good a driver as any. Im always seeking the "Catch", warrants, Debt to which im told none and any overhang. All in all it seems primed, and i don't own any Oil stocks and can see a mini Oil race occurring here alongside the Critical minerals where im Balls deep in some Top stocks, and a bit of Gold/Silver/Copper play on GSCU. So im tempted here, based on what ive looked into so far. Id like to hear more from the pessimistic side as not much from the positive side I can't find out for myself, so more a view from what people's objections are and more importantly, Why?

Going off what a CEO said and didn't deliver a decade ago isnt an investment strategy, you invest with the fundementals that are put in front of you, not 10 years of emotional baggage. Things change rapidly

Think we are all anticipating strong numbers at some point, i find Top slicing is best and if it doesn't return and continues into higher numbers its a risk, but the likelihood it will then likely return to your original sell price from initial Run and depending on your appetite for Trading or further investing you may have made further gains and can reinvest at that same level minus the proceeds in a new investment

Unfortunately, its a Non Revenue stock in the midst of an Orphan period still seeking Feasibility and funding not a Trampoline

Thanks DrAnomoly, Good read appreciate the time to share. Im not one for selling stocks, if you can't support a stock through tough times you don't deserve the rewards on good times.

So jog on Red, for all you're about to spout.

GLA

This is some next level Scrooge McDuck stuff this, just more to the Saga!! Complete comedy, Shambles, there is a Lesson in this somewhere

Yet to find it

Unbelievable!!

"manlord1: The seller can only sell shares once! We had a 50k block seller at 10p for months bringing us back to 6p. It was confirmed as a distressed seller (business needs) and when he was out, we flew to 30p in a week. Sadly for him he missed out on all the rises but it proved to me and has done many times that weeks of drip drip drip can be wiped out in a couple of good buying sessions so looking forward to that soon. ML"

AVDFN

The amount of a crap i recieved for bringing this to peoples attention at the time, liar, deramper the lot. And here he is, spouting the Truth

Now im another Alias of the forum, lay off those sticky green buds. Do yourselves a favour lads, by all means be positive this is looking like right place, right time, right conditions point in its companies history, but don't follow this Juvenile moron, he is as insecure as a sweaty purple haired lefty

"The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."

- Socrates

Timmy Ten Bag,

"I will say: as oil rises and China need to secure alternative supply, Mongolia becomes a vital strategic interest to them.

China previously got large amounts of oil from Venezuela and Iran. Both now not available"

Its Ironic that you're regurgitating every point I made amd copying what I said yesterday, but in the same breath claim im a Troll. Your like the Guy at the party who has no clue, no team to support you just shout "Go Oil" in response to whats read.

Plonker

Ye im out, even if its became interested in couldn't bare listening to these blinkered idiots. More ways to skin a cat

GL to those invested

Fook off to these absolute weirdos

Azzzba

You still crying about that? Grow some mate, it was a week ago amd I apologised. You either accept it like a gentleman or insult me. You think Doc was a Troll and a pain, ill be a nightmare and im quite positive

And no Proquo

You filtered because you said some daft 5hit, didn't like an opposing view. And filtered, as is the way of the uneducated class these days

Margaritas

You clearly dont read, i said i was taking the Mick in response to 3 members coming to another stocks forum posting over a 100 times of a weekend that it will be 10p next week. So clearly, you only read what you want to see based on your view. As no, I didn't have any evidence im such only being a jerk like these was. But obviously them at my stock, has made me look at theirs and I actually like what I see not the opposite, but I don't just buy i read, investigate and talk among shareholders whilst doing so. So ye, Net Value Asset is lower, Intrinsic Value higher and we are somewhere in the middle.

But im literally learning nothing from this Nobhead incapable of reason or opposite opinion, clearly an Andrew Tate bashing Lefty

Clearly didn't understand my point, which was neither Positive or Negative just reflective

Such a Novice, and an Abusive one at that!!

"And the valuation disconnect is gigantic"

Sounds Fancy, perhaps the Intrinsic Value can be reached but at a 23.91 million Market Cap you are actually higher than the Net Value Asset. So first you must overcome a Decade of balancing that