Member Info for dunderhead

Pipedragger hear what you're saying but at the end of the day this pipeline was beyond its useful 'technical life' determined when first installed hence I personally am happy with final clarification on this and regardless of your comments about integrity it is still an excellent opportunity that the mgt have seized, so think you should give credit where credits due matey!!

Good luck with that redden. I would be super amazed if it drops as low as 28p but if it does will be personally investing large amounts if money as will a lot of other I know so any talk of 22p has to be absolutely impossible lol!! All imho of course.

Great post GG 're pipeline integrity really lol and EXACTLY what I was going to post! I didntvthink of any other example and tbh was mildly surprised to the upside wuth such positive results!!

Ha lol bruv. Yes I ain't angry just bemused? Are we trin holders just an optimistic minority?!

It may well have done biggles but I have seen similar somewhere else but cant remember where that some new directors had joined but were preclude from initially buying because of being insiders. Surely they could have made the same disclosure with these new guys with a caveat that this may or may not lead to a deal? Only my opinion and doesnt really matter anyway now!!

Yes but what about boc?! That was who I was referring to. Out of interest has anyone seen the petroceltic website, reading through the comments on there they really stick the knife in to previous 'mgt'. How the capitans have crashed! All imho of course.

Ghosty r u a holder bruv? You seem a little 'angry'. I could understand if the mgt had made mistakes but this seems a really solid set of figures and the general mkt should catch up in the days....weeks... ahead. Ahem I'll get me coat!!

Well not wanting to harp on about it but Jus was certain (maybe less so now I don't know as he has me filtered) that said person had not invested because they were working on projects that precluded them from purchasing? Serious question do people think that could still be the case? He could be working in the Corrib BD? But when I wrote to the pr they came out with some crap that they couldn't possibly comment if he was in restricted trading period because that in itself was price sensitive information. I didn't feel this to be the case because there us no indication which assets they were working on etc and we all knew aboutvghd Corrib possibility at the time. I did point out that I felt that they could have indicated this when the directors started work with a covering statement that they would be in restricted trading period from start if employment which would then not be price sensitive makes common sense to me? I suppose a question for agm? As ever all imho of course and dyor.

No Apache the beasts are the buyers for aex out this morning. A lot of interest today.

Not (early) today then!

That last post obviously all imho of course.

Tullow dudnt continue deeper possibly because the well wasn't designed for those depths and becayse Tullow were looking for oil. 3d seismic is useful but ffs, a well with a vsp shot is worth ten times 3d from an information perspective.

I have over a million now as well. I have respect for hugh as a g&g man but (maybe less now than b4) when I first started buying there was a very different asset mix which was what appealed to me. I certainly do not believe the current bod structure is optimal and have been saying this for quite some time but feel we are too late for any changes now as it has all become a bit binary! I feel we 'should' get lucky in one of our Irish plays but am disappointed we don't have much more asset backing now, if this isn't the case. So I suppose I'm still here as a gamble as we have slept walked to this position which I didn't expect to be in and also I swear, this is the last time I buy a stock in spite of mgt as opposed to because of (lol). My other 'similar' gamble stock is aex which I also bought in spite of mgt which I am loss in (as opposed to b even here). I have finally learnt (lol) a crap mgt / 'not correct set up' team can f up and ruin good company/assets but, a good mgt team can work around crap assets and create value. It's worth remembering as well, that you have to give mgt chances to prove themselves and often people may have already purchased a large amount of shares - then the mgt gets changed - you give chances - then as is often the case - it is too late before you finally lose faith in said mgt? So best of luck all as I think the next 2 months are pretty pivotal!! As ever and all imho and one good thing, if this doesn't work out, is that at least hugh has put his hard earned in as well so will feel it as well as us!!

Juries still out 're Kenya but yes of course we can agree that but, within that same context can we also agree Tullow actually drilled on our licence and walked. Doesn't mean they don't make mistakes of course but also doesn't increase confidence either. NOT de ramping just being realistic. We need realism here as well as positivism or else disappointment achieves knee jerk reactions probably similar to the share price reaction to recent barn stormer of a farm out?

Yeah thatsxwhere I'm kind of landing now to tell u the truth. I had wanted to crystallise some cgt losses but I have had to change that strategy which means I'm hanging on to these buggers a little longer than initially anticipated!!

Christ almighty. At least there was a semblance of intelligent posting and discussion (Aex related) this morning. Great post bruv.

Good God this wasn't the point. We've had the ahem "bidding war" lol. It is the crystallization of let's face it, a one bid on the table deal, which by definition should be relatively quick and easy to get voted through by share holders. For some reason this is taking an inordinate amount of time. For me it is absolutely ridiculous to blame 1st and 2nd world comparisons for internal machinations at Aex or even worse to state "it is what it is". Anyway we are polarised in our views and I don't think either will convince the other of the virtuality of our respective arguments.

Oh course it's a valid comparison. This is a multi multi billion pound deal which IS massively complicated. What is so complicated and requires so much time for this (quite frankly) off the shelf farm out arrangement. PLEASE ANSWER CP, I really really don't understand myself so am interested in your reasons and experiences in such matters? To disguise issues around '1st and 2nd world' for sign off of a deal (whatever that patronisingly means, please also explain) is just wrong in SO MANY ways!! Or just perhaps there are other reasons for such a length of time that the company has chosen not to share? Yet I am the rude person? (Lol) You and a few others on here need to look in a mirror for quite a long time I think, when finding almost racist reasons for justifying a very slow deal completion. Best of luck all and as ever all imho.

CP as ever, you choose (you can't be that obtuse can you?) to ignore the point totally. Drewky continues with his deflection posts that are nothing to do with why Aex finds itself in the current position? Well done guys, keep it up and ignore or try to disrupt conversations, about the real issues Aex face! Accusation of being a shorter (worm) on the way lol!

Complex and time consuming are somewhat subjective descriptions and I'd hint probably 'limited' by the relevant 'mgt' teams involved!! Also to say this farm out is complex, really is ridiculous lol! I was actually surprised at the simplicity and the fact that there wasn't some form of 'reflection' about the fact that zubs had funded historic jv costs through their equity holding in Aex. Perhaps that is why the back costs were so 'miserly'. People tend to forget this detail! All imho of course.