We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
No, not in the traditional sense. It would be good to see widespread adoption of DT throughout Uk government and public sector, but this is unlikely. It's a little ironic to see Palo Alto mentioned in the link, given that they're dealing with a zero day vulnerability in their own network.
You seem to be suggesting that even if the outcome of this trial is a guilty verdict, then this still represents good publicity for DT. I know you're an eternal optimist, but this goes beyond optimism, ibto the realms of wishful fantasy
Typically asinine comment from our resident doomsayer. Almost as bad as your criticism of DT for employing astrophysicists, whose standard of maths and understanding of complex systems is likely to be far better their IT graduate peers. Oxbridge don't get much of a lookin when it comes to the best cyber security courses
The link is that Darktrace provides products that are designed to protect organisations against cyber attacks like this, and that these attacks are occuring frequently, and that many organisations don't have the in-house skills to protect their systems
Investibot (or whatever you call yourself) -this was an interesting thread, with none of the usual "sky's the limit/not enough R&D investment" cliches, then you come along with irrelevant guff like this. You have failed the Turing test with flying colours.
Typical Daily Telegraph half a story. A UK citizen can't be subpeona'd to the US to give evidence but under the Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (“Hague Evidence Convention”), English Courts will assist US Courts to obtain oral and documentary evidence from UK witnesses
Ai-investor, why not try to provide an insight beyond your tedious "not enough investment" mantra? You really are up there with Charles when it comes to knowing that a post will say without having to read its "content"