We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Well, financial circumstances (the loss of my business and most of my monthly income to the Coronavirus pandemic) finally forced me to sell my entire holdings in Tremor.
I bought in during the great Blinkx short in January of 2014 and so have watched this closely for the last 6 and a half years or so.
As a result I've lost most of my hair (as well as my coat)!
I was hoping to see this one out to the end but circumstances have forced me out earlier than expected.
I had to accept a whopping 86% loss on my original investment, which was a substantial amount of my personal savings, but so it goes I guess...
It's taught me never to invest in stocks and shares again, especially on the gambling casino called AIM.
I want to wish all of the longer term holders all the very best and truly hope that one day this share comes good.
A special goodbye to Rustybucket, who I think bought in around the same time as me and who has been a constant comment poster on this board ever since. Good luck mate.
Goodbye and good luck to all.
The institutions are indeed hoovering up, helped by the mood music made by people like stt1. He's an industry professional whose job it is to help buyers obtain them as cheap as possible by scaring gullible private investors.
People should stop taking his comments personally. He's just doing his job.
That's why he's impervious to comments.
He's just getting paid to do his job. Not just in this share but multiple others under different user profiles.
It seems that Tosca aren't quite as worried about the future prospects of this share as Stt1 currently is.
Maybe they'd heard a hint about the tie-up with News Corp.
Nothing from Stt1 today.
He never seems to comment when the sp rises, a time when, as an apparent de-ramper, one might expect him to.
And if you don't believe in the notion of organised de-rampers then you clearly weren't reading this board during the great blinkx short of 2014.
Stt1 has obviously influenced baldeagle to the extent that he overuses this in his punctuation:
...
Still waiting for baldeagle to tell us why he went long (or short) despite claiming stt1 has always been right?
Simple questions but no answers = exactly the same as stt1.
I'll ask again: are you long or short? What's your entry point relative to the current sp? Why did you buy in despite stt1 being apparently right in all his assertions?
Simple questions, so simple answers will suffice.
I await with (un)bated breath for your response
And no, he's not a rich and powerful individual.
But those who employ him and provide him with the material he keeps endlessly trolling out certainly are.
It's an AIM share, so of course it is being manipulated.
So perhaps you'll tell us your position on this share? Long or short? What was your buy in price? And if you're invested why, if you've read all his comments over the past few years and think he's right, are you still in?
I say he's trying to influence how people invest in this share (and others).
If he's not, why is he bothering doing all this?
Every so often people like you, with barely any comments on the forum pop up and defend him. Then they disappear never to be heard of again.
So, if stt1 is not invested either long or short in this company, what's he doing it for?
For our sake?
All this input for nothing in return?
I don't buy it.
You are part of the same network, or more likely, are one and the same person.
Just like all the rest of them.
Investing in stocks like this
This was the comment meant.
I was wrong though because he works it both ways. Up and down according to client needs.
He's a professional manipulator IMO.
I made this assertion several weeks ago and no one commented.
IMHO.
This shows how despite all the buying a cap is kept on the sp
Stt1 isa buyer's friend, helping to keep downward pressure on the sp while his mates hoover up using algo trading.
He might go quiet for a bit now. If not I expect to see further buys which don't impact on the sp, followed by another RNS in due course.
The same thing happened when the Saudi firm filled up.
Of course he might just turn up and tell us how dodgy shroders are.
Stt1 is a market manipulator, not an investor and works it both ways depending upon the needs of his clients.
All IMHO of course.
Stt1 works for people who want to buy shares, not short them.
The interested parties he represents want to buy them as cheaply as possible without pushing the price up, and do this by using stt1 and his friends to create market tension by keeping downward pressure on the price by talking them down in quiet periods, whilst the actual buyers use high frequency trading to hoover them up as cheaply as possible while this happens.
Hence the latest RNS reporting a substantial increase in holding without making a jot of difference to the sp.
Stt1's a 'buyer's friend'.
Who's the latest buyer?
His mates.
That stt1 fella has gone a little quiet over the last couple of weeks. I wonder why?
I guess someone might have got their very short and stubby typing fingers badly burned.
I don't expect many will feel too bad about that, given the kicking he's been giving us with obvious relish for the last 2 years.
£10 is about the same as I need.
We can but dream....
I reckon the rapid increases in sp over the last couple of days will have blown many short positions out of the water.
I suspect we've been helped by a short squeeze.
But I bet stt1 hasn't though.
He's done for, so let's take this opportunity to say goodbye.
His raison d'etre on here is over.
Tricky - I referred to 'some' people, not all. Those who present information to counter stt1 assertions (like you and BMac and GW) are clearly not in concert with him.
But others are IMO.
Look at the posts over the last couple of months where supposedly 'new' investors have turned up to express 'concerns' on an almost daily basis about short term price movements and suspicious sells/buys.Or turning up and asserting that stt1 is just a concerned investor. I won't name names but you must have read them over the past couple of months.
JinkyJ - you are the one who constantly draws attention to his posts on a daily basis, are all the time saying that you're reporting or have reported him to the BB admin (apparently never to any effect) and have NEVER ONCE commented about anything to do with the company.
You're more boring even than he is
I've told you constantly that I'm 85% down because that's what I am.
If you go back over my posts from the last 5 years you'll see that I'm consistent in what I've said.
If you really want to make stt1 irrelevant, then stop going on and on and on and on and on and on and about him.
Because that's what you do.
And I think you are doing it deliberately to draw attention to his posts.
All IMHO of course. Have a nice weekend.
As far as I'm concerned you're helping him by constntly drawing attention to his post while procaliworking in cencert with him
PS: I haven't read anything by stt1 for months, even in response to my own comments. I don't filter him, you don't need to if you just ignore him anyway.
I strongly recommend that course of action to others.
You're wasting your time posting about Totally on this board mate. Stt1 bailed about a month ago. Just check his post history. He quietly sold out at a loss after ramping Totally just as much as he de-ramps TAP.
As for Totally, they're on their way. A desperate attempt to gain £9 million to buy Greenbrook so the can extract the cash pile prior to Totally hitting the deck.
These are money movers just like RhythmOne players.
I'm glad my money (still 85% down on my original Blinkx purchase) is in TAP rather than TLY. I know which of the two is likely to go bust soonest, and it isn't TAP IMHO.
Meanwhile, stt1 and the bunch of people who support his de-ramping on here (along with some of those who are 'supposedly' against him but constantly keep drawing attention to his posts) are a actually a network of amateur shorters.
Ultimately, ramping or de-ramping these shares at this amateur level doesn't make a jot of difference. This is nothing like the organised network of shorters involved in the original Blinkx short of 2014. The SP will be decided by ongoing results posted by the company.
If TAP grow revenue and profits the SP will take care of itself.
If people are truly opposed to stt1 and his ilk then ignore them. Stop giving oxygen to his views by constantly drawing attention to his comments while still proclaiming that you ignore him anyway.
... clearly don't share stt1's concerns.
Silly of them I guess.
Interesting to note that when the big boys buy the price falls.
Algo trading, don't you just love it?
It's clear that several new posters on here are stt1 shorting cronies.
At the end of the day if the business grows and succeeds the sp will take care of itself.
The problem is that people continue to respond to stt1's posts instead of just ignoring it.
It makes me think that some posters, despite supposedly opposing him, are actually working in concert with him, by constantly highlighting his comments.
It all just bores me to death quite frankly.