Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Just realised it’s a mis-spelt account name. Then made the mistake of clicking through to see its profile - what a bell-end…
Anyway, for those that look at “that other BB”, Sankshelia has only been a member (pun intended) from 3rd November.
Anyone remember who the original Sanksheila account used to be? Got set up as a joke ages ago when Sanks used to troll “that other BB” with stories of his bird Sheila but can’t remember who it was. Been in this share far too long lol
See page 11 (CAB54) of the PDF:
https://cmis.warrington.gov.uk/cmis5/MeetingsCalendar/tabid/73/ctl/ViewMeetingPublic/mid/410/Meeting/8831/Committee/1307/Default.aspx
The transaction ultimately “failed” as novation of the loan was no longer required. This wasn’t because the council didn’t approve their side, but that talks between Moulding Capital and Longbow presumably broke down.
The cabinet approved the proposed transaction in their July meeting, it’s in the minutes / agenda packs. The transaction didn’t go ahead and was later referred to as “flawed” in the October agenda pack. Doesn’t mean the council scuppered it - probably just trying to gloss over some internal failing or other.
I see Qube have been pratting about again. A small reduction in short position to go with their small increase a few days earlier which follows their small reduction a week or two ago.
Is it shorts that are meant to provide liquidity and price discovery? Seems like they’re just trading for pennies to me.
We don’t pay for anything licker, we’re secondary market. Good for others’ liquidity and that’s it. Lucky enough to have the opportunity to invest in what should be a coveted private asset (think Lego…)
Funny that everyone has stopped beeyatching about MM all of a sudden. Was only a few days ago his head was for the block, no wonder he thinks of us PIs as fast money… Let’s remember to have some decorum for next time guys n gals.
THG is the product of Matt’s obsession for the last 20ish years, not sure why a bunch of armchair spectators feel so entitled to have a pop just because they chucked a few grand in over the last couple of years. If you’re in over your head then own it and reduce. Personally I’m very excited for the next few weeks/months/years. THG have invested to become IMHO a global behemoth, glad to be here.
Thanks for clarifying Rock8, wasn’t sure whether you were suggesting that Matt was leaking to his friends. If it’s leaks from within THG then this is just fast money at play. I’m slow money sadly (in more ways than one it seems)
@Rock8
“In which case he successfully Pumped and Dumped the share price as we all know Matt’s mates sold before the rumoured deal collapsed.”
Remind me which of Matt’s mates sold, did we get a TR1 or other statutory notice?
Read point #3 please SNT:
https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/shortcuts/2017/jul/04/misunderstood-molluscs-five-reasons-love-slug-chris-packham
Thanks OSG. No interest in paying for a broker note unfortunately. I have reviewed the thread as suggested however and the post I guess you’re referring to was the CityWire C&P by HH (thanks HH) which had no mention of “adding heavily” or “200% upside”. The first time these words were mentioned in the thread were by Ahananda who posted:
“We are adding heavily at around these levels.
A 200% plus upside is compelling”
Like I said though, I don’t have the broker note and not interested in paying for it. Was just curious if anyone could confirm whether Ahananda was posting an excerpt from the note, or was using the royal “we”…
Is that actually what the broker note said? Seems like a conflict of interest (not saying conflicts of interest don’t happen, just seems odd to have one spelled out so blatantly in a broker note)
Boom16, talk about throwing the baby out with the bath water…
Alternatively they could, for example, attract a strategic partner for the nutrition division, separately list the nutrition division with inward investment from said strategic partner, continue to grow the nutrition division.
The things I’ve always like about THG is that it is vertically integrated (good for margins and control) and diversified. I remember a year or two back when it was the Beauty division everyone creamed over and Nutrition was the worry. Beauty is set to come back as the manufacturing division becomes profitable again (following global destocking).