Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
If my memory still serves well, then I recollect that any slanderous posts against Amit Ben Haim were then very very quickly removed ? And here we are, 3 days later..
It then possibly appears that as preliminary enquiries are currently being made by the Serious Fraud Office to try determine the validity in any allegations of said fraud, that these posts courtesy of them still being retained, then suggest that there is at least ‘official’ concern that the allegations could be valid.
Suspecting that any good news for shareholders would then possibly be pre-empted by :
(A) the sudden notification from UK brokers that contact from Cloudtag does now exist &/or,
(B) the sudden removal of all posts that tie Amit Ben Haim to the Serious Fraud Office courtesy of the allegations of fraud then being proven as misconstrued.
It is indeed an extraordinary amusing concept HITS, that one Pi can then single handedly curtail any intended $275M payment.
Should the Serious Fraud Office then believe that :
(A) no offence has been committed then there is simply no further action taken, hence the earlier note given, that any ‘..sincere investors might later consider refining the data inputs for raising a fraud report after the 23rd or 25th or 28th or 30th iteration of Amit’s unsuccessful attempts to contact..’ the shareholders &/or brokers &/or distribution agents &/or grandparents, both living & deceased. And IF there is no further action by SFO they do not always notify you, they just simply ignore it, or..
(B) the SFO then believes that there is a case to investigate, then this may just start with a simple phone call. Perhaps the SFO “what’s happening?..” & Amit would then hopefully explain “… funds stalled at escrow account number ********** awaiting details of Ms.Carrot’s Papa New Guinea account..” that then placates the SFO. But should Amit then not satisfy some fairly simple queries, then perhaps the SFO can put the long suffering & possibly abused shareholders, out of their misery.
Going by the somewhat aggressive arguments of several investors then it is indeed correct that the true / actual circumstances are exposed now, rather than being left to ferment for yet another year.
“..To be honest if I end up not getting what has been promised it will be the lies than will irritate me more than not having the money….”
And yet here you are, extremely irritated that one investor had the audacity to prioritise chasing the truth over chasing his financial well-being.
May i just ask one question with reference to the lack of logic you are applying to all your arguments… which gender are you ? (ps. If your being a carrot, then is cool, is perfectly acceptable).
Your one month of posting history is very telling.
2 weeks ago & you posted:
“..Well, if I do get something I will have more money than I have now. If I don't get anything I will have the same money that I have now. I am not going to stress about it. To be honest if I end up not getting what has been promised it will be the lies than will irritate me more than not having the money. Either way Amit will not cause me to kick my dog, although it might be sufficient reason for me to kick next doors mangy cat..”
And yet now today you have totally changed your tune :
(1) & are not interested in getting an independent office to cast an eye over any possible lies
(2) & that you are now totally stressed out.. ?!
It ain’t too surprising then bud, that you will very likely again need a new posting history.
Steelbru., the CTAG web-site & its word-salads from 1st June then suggests that both deals had been completed.
Out-with full amount, the reported deposit on 30th March of the quoted $50M licensing payment, still meets the remit of the SFO figures that are looked for. The Director of SFO should hopefully be able to resolve.
“..jolly well done..” will only come from a resolution being obtained that then stops this nonsense which has cost people dearly & reportedly, even one fatality.
Thanks Antha, I’m hoping the Director of the Serious Fraud Office can give a quick resolution on possible fraud involving Amit Ben Haim’s company Cloudtag, with imv its high probability that it falls within the scope of the SFO’s statutory remit, inclusive of ‘..likely involving large sums of money in the tens of millions of pounds or higher..’.
With CTAG having deposited $275M obtained from company assets, then we should fall within the statutory remit & so any final long awaited resolution would be most welcome.
Whether or not the submitted report actually meets the statutory remit of the SFO it does at least get the ball rolling, in several new directions. And also there is nothing to stop any sincere investors from again picking up & refining the request for fraud investigation, say perhaps after the 23rd or 25th or 28th or 30th CTAG iteration of “..IF..”
One is grateful for the multitude of investors who post almost everyday of ‘its a fraud’ & then naively contradict that with ‘i can’t be bothered reporting it’. The positive obtained from such strange repetitive behaviour is that they do create viewing figures.
Those viewing figures then promote the thread in any external internet searches, be it google for eg. AMIT BEN-HAIM, or even say, perhaps for elder brother SHLOMO BEN-HAIM (& all that unfortunate brother’s ongoing business concerns) which then, courtesy of a multitude of viewings by those ‘I can’t be bothered’s’ then ends up highlighting those names in any www.searches, tied in with the UK’s SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE. The 2nd prong then hopefully promotes SHLOMO BEN-HAIM to take some elder brother responsibility for younger sibling’s irresponsible behaviour. Any resolution is being aimed at to put a stop to this nonsense.
The final prong in the trident, for future use, that if all else fails, it is simply that it is of course a pretty good story : irresponsible CEO with previous working links to the FCA commits $275M fraud. A story that perhaps has value, eg. after the Post Office scandal & their close working relationship with UK.gov has finally blown over.
Recently raised a report with the Serious Fraud Office under its filing for :
‘ I want to provide information about a case of serious or complex fraud, bribery or corruption (affecting several victims/harming the wider public/impacting on the UK as an international financial centre, and/or likely involving large sums of money in the tens of millions of pounds or higher)’
I have reported that Amit Ben Halim has used the UK financial market to enable placings amounting to almost £9M to finance Cloudtag. That this company was then voluntary withdrawn from the London listing. And that subsequently, this companies assets were then sold for $275M which is being held in an escrow facility. That the company then has misled shareholders over 22 subsequent company posts of transaction problems. One victim allegedly having taken his life & so attached the link & screenshots to London South East CTAG bb with relevant timimgs, forwarded to the SFO.
I have no knowledge of any alleged further placings that might have contributed to this complex fraud, so this was not entered. Perhaps others may have information?
There then exists the possibility that the UK shareholders of a previously listed company are being defrauded of $275M.
Personally I believe Amit is a sick man which was referred to in report, but that belief does not preclude that the $275M possibility, no matter how far-fetched or remote, does exist, until at least an assessment of Amit Ben Halim is carried out.
This report then gets sent to the Director of the Serious Fraud Office for assessment.
I do believe that Amit should be held liable for his irresponsible actions towards the UK shareholders. And that the oft quoted ‘$275M held in escrow’ then meets the SFO requirement for ‘tens of millions of pounds or higher’.
Fingers crossed that there is then a resolution arriving that puts an end to this sorry saga.
Lol, soz MD, but Yet again i find myself at odds with your reasoning. 2 main points that need addressing, so allow me to list ‘my opinions’ as per their priorities :
“…The billions of traded shares in two days seems to have just once again put up a middle digit to the bod’s efforts and have eroded a little more of Barons credibility.I suppose there will be many that disagree,but every one has an opinion..”
The market reaction had nothing to do with Baron’s credibility. This was the 3rd round of signatures, aimed at confirming that BOIL have a working relationship with TL. Putting into perspective, if BOIL said tomorrow that they now have a partner prepared to cover drill costs, would TL then stop play, on account that there is yet still a 4th signature session (true) yet to be addressed. Of course they would not stop play. The news on Thursday was then expected. The photos had already been published days before.
The sp then spiked…Totally unexpectedly. The spike was led by day traders trying to earn 10% off of a v.loud chorus of sweet FA. These peeps though do work quite hard to earn that 10%. Hence a lot of noise. This has absolutely nothing to do with Baron’s credibility. A totally separate issue bud.
“…market chose to do another pump and dump to,demonstrate that an invester is an irrelevance in this market.The only way here is make a quick buck and dump it.I quite understand that is how how many operate,but why is the word investment in the title of the market…”
Investing is what you make of it. ‘..the only way here is make a quick buck and dump it’. It is Not the only way, but rather if used as an investing method, then some peeps can do well out of it. Just takes very good concentration. So not one of my skill-sets, but… i was able to slice 20% easily, then buy back the same number of shares at 0.04p cheaper, & so reduce my average from 0.084p down to 0.076p. So not quite a pump & dump but rather was a lucky slice & a lucky re-investment.
Investing is what you make of it. There is thankfully no chorus on this bb leading new investors astray, with anyone stating “staying till 3p” or “staying till 1p” etc etc trying to sway others. Peeps are just posting calculations from broker reports & from cross-analysis with similar situations. Hopefully as just good references.
Lol but the “staying till 1p” did previously happen but then as we all know, Robbie sold at 0.35p. Some believed the script but the majority did not, most of whom were day-traders. And even once the avalanche had started it was fairly easy to jump off. The suggestion is, that if peeps are not understanding the driving mechanisms then perhaps a 10% or 20% slice on these spikes is the way to go ?
Totally agree though bud on your 1st point ; thinking that Horta might have some good news on his return.
An interesting interpretation. Some might disagree though that there is nothing imminent.
C.A: “Baron Oil — farm-up signed, funding possibly imminent, and when the majors finally get in gear and make some decisions, Chuditch will be bought at a significant premium. I am absolutely convinced of this and will continue to add at low prices through 2024. Selling/trading? Don’t complain when the rocket launches".
C.A. clearly warns you :
“…Selling/trading? Don’t complain when the rocket launches…”
Remarkably similar figures bud to the 24th January update from Allenby:
‘ Valuation: Our risked valuation for the Chuditch project is US$190m (0.765p at
£1=US$1.25). This assumes a farm-down in Baron’s interest to 30.0%, GPOS (geological
probability of success) risking and project valuation quotients ranging from US$1.3/boe
to US$2.5/boe. Our success case Chuditch valuation is US$683m based on US$5.0/boe.
These adjusted valuations reflect the new post assumed farm-out from 37.5% to 30.0%.’
This report then equates to an approximate valuation of c.3p for a 30% holding on a success case, of the Chuditch main field.
The report statement is then only for the main field :
‘– Chuditch project: It is a potentially world class gas project with contingent Pmean gas resources of 1,165 bcf in the Chuditch field.
There is additional prospectivity in three other prospects..’
One wonders if a success on the main field would then result in a good outcome being transposed onto Chuditch NE & 2 additional reservoirs [2.1Tcfg Pmean Prospective Resources] with respect to these results then being upgraded, courtesy of the similar algorithms being used..
Charles Archer. “..Chuditch will be bought at a significant premium. I am absolutely convinced of this and will continue to add at low prices through 2024….”
So i keep wondering IF this is the reason Horta is looking tired & slightly peeved… having perhaps to associate & be hosted by capitalists who may possibly have sold off some of the family silver ?!
Lol.. less coffee perhaps.
Https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/n13xtmdc/broadcasts/upcoming
Maybe able to pick up some data on the outcome of Horta’s meetings this week with the recent financier & developer of Angola’s Cabinda Oil Refinery, on Monday’s early morning Hardtalk broadcast..
Fingers crossed bud.
The island has already come on thru leaps & bounds (the original UN posting at end of conflict, was noted for the total austerity. The UN team thought Kosovo was a holiday.
But hoping that pretty soon, the 2 heid honchos then take the island up to the next level, complete with those 5-star hotels.
Gordon, that too was my initial thinking.. excessive!
From CPR:
1. gross Pmean Contingent Resources of 1.1 Tcfg
2. relatively low risk Pmean Prospective Resources of 2.1 Tcfg
From Q&A bank at Quora, ‘how much is 1Tcfg worth?’ :
“.. 42 years of oil & gas operations & management.
Author has 4K answers and 3.4M answer views.
How much is a 1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas worth?
It depends on a number of factors, including quality, location, contract delivery terms, etc. In the U.S., the value at the wellhead is about $3.00 per million BTU, which for 1,000 BTU gas is the same as $3.00 per thousand cubic feet.
One trillion cubic feet would therefore be worth $3 billion at the wellhead (i.e., to the producer), which is kind of nonsensical because it will take a while to deliver that quantity.
If you’re contracting for delivery of LNG by tanker, you’re probably going to pay a higher price, probably one based on the energy content on a barrel of oil equivalent basis.
That would be a price closer to $9.00/mcf. The value of a 1 TCF contract delivered over a several year term would be $9 billion to the purchaser…”
Currently is $12 per BTU although Japan tends to pay a premium, now at $13.5.
I’m guessing that is where your $40B evaluation came from.. ?
lol… Would be very happy with the Allenby evaluation of £600M.
Howie / Mr.S., I think we will need O2 bottles!
Honestly wasn’t expecting today’s market reaction but rather thought it might occur, next week when Horta gets back to TL.
Wasn’t expecting but took advantage to slice 20% then buy them back cheaper And so anle to top up on another oillie favourite, slightly more north.
Lol, but the desperate shenanigans of a few boy traders, then had me switching off & picking up a costa.
Looking like 2024 is starting off with a bang. GLA