Member Info for Doc83

"Stay off wsbn lucky with you negativity or ill be here forever"

Oh dear, don't tell me LuckyRambo (WOS) is back to his old tricks of stalking and harassing other boards?!

43 trades such more than it has been for most of this year!!!

Tray, you'll have to stop (tempting me), please. Because I can't keep looking down the back of the settee for more cash to put into POW!

Shame. I might have topped up ;)

I reckon we've had three 20% falls since this good run started post MRE start RNS.

How many shares has Mr Buck bought that weren't through a raise? Genuine question.

Lucky (WOS) was buying at around 5p.

Could this be another 20%+ pullback, as we’ve seen a number of times since the good run? Possibly. And possibly an opportunity for those so inclined to top up.

"It’s weird that people spend 24/7 here but think MATD are doomed. It’s doesn’t make sense. A normal person would just move on with their lives. Oh well. 🤷🏻‍♂️"

Because they don't spend 24/7 here you loon!

"🤣 what would you lot do without Manlord and Chatgpt eh. It wasn't that difficult a read"

OK, Dusty. Next time you can do an AGEOS style summary of the next results ;)

We've talked about going it on our own, JV'ing or even selling out.

When you consider the likes of a Rio Tinto have annual net income of ~£10bn, for them to spend money snapping up the likes of an EEE really is loose change. Providing we can of course prove it is worth it to them. Bring on that MRE result!

Oh yes, and only 2.5p in old money. So with some good news, a bit of hype, FOMO, it's certainly achievable.

But even if we just keep ticking along like this, realising value, we'll eventually rerate.

Sol, ideally, a buyback might get us close to 20p, then good news from uranium pushes us to 30p+.

I'm here anticipating north of 50p and perhaps much more over the next few years.

AGEOS’s post are hugely appreciated. Sadly, my pea-sized brain can’t keep up with him!

AGEOS - if he eternally grateful if you could put a one line summary at the end of each post, for example, “in summary, these are excellent results”!

Https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/FDR/establishment-of-drilling-site-complete-af59t6dqrqzlsa5.html

Just on this last sentence:

"Of that 1.507billion tonnes, the 6.4sq km high-grade central zone accounts for an estimated 713.6M tonnes plus the 105M tonnes from the deeper RC intercepts, thus totalling 818.6M tonnes which assayed at 6%+ TiO2. Significant as this is, remember that the stated JORC Exploration Target is 26-32billion tonnes based on an appraisal of the 320sq km gravity/magnetics anomaly and associated titanium enrichment within the Pitfield mineral province."

So, the Thomas prospect (which is approx 20% of the overall Pitfield site) looks like it has ~1.5bn tonnes. But we reckon Pitfield has 26-32bn tonnes in total?

Marg is definitely one of the more dense puppets on here.

I just want him to tell me - are we still stuck?!

Interesting how different people can see it so differently. Having met Sean, I was very impressed with him. And I've met a few AIM CEOs over the years, most of them deeply unimpressive.

Yes, in hindsight we could have perhaps held onto our GMET shares, but at the time Sean knew it would make us financially secure and you're not to know the SP will double and/or if they'd be another buyer down the line.

We're now absolutely financially secure and with options most other AIM companies would love to have. That's not to mention all our other projects and spin-offs that we have going on in the background.

As for imagination and talent, I'd argue Sean has done a great job at what he can control. The SP isn't one of those things.

"Defies fundamentals !"

Can you elaborate and tell me what fundamentals specifically you are referring to?

Even before the sale of GMET, a raise was likely not going to be needed for the next few years. This should secure us for a lifetime in the AIM world and you'd think would make it attractive to AIM investors, where almost on a daily basis another company is raising at a 50% discount to their SP.