RE: Navion Oceania22 Jan 2020 22:50
adoubleuk
08.11.19 I replied to a post by bransonbull thread title "Two reasons....we arent at 60p"
bransonbull
Kerogen and Warwick Deep are contributors but they are not the primary reason for the current share price. When you consider that the Lancaster EPS alone is sufficient to support the current sp it becomes clear that NO VALUE is ascribed to:
1) Lancaster full field development.
2) Lincoln (a proved discovery)
3) Warwick.
4) Halifax.
5) Whirlwind.
None of this potential value has been priced in and the question is WHY.
The only rational explanation is that investors are still wary of that term unconventional reservoir used to describe fractured basement.
Is this a reasonable conclusion or has the FB risk factor been deliberately exaggerated and if so by whom and for what purpose?
and you reply:
DC,
"The only rational explanation is that investors are still wary of that term unconventional reservoir used to describe fractured basement. Is this a reasonable conclusion or has the FB risk factor been deliberately exaggerated and if so by whom and for what purpose?"
I think it's a reasonable conclusion. Though your other suggestion may be correct, as well. The problem being that if it actually is the latter, one enters into speculative territory, and runs the risk of being labelled a conspiracy-theorist!