RE: Financials due in weeks1 Mar 2024 12:30
With the December financials due at the end of the month we'll get a better handle on current NAV. At 20p I reckon we are probably trading at somewhere between 15% and 20% discount to NAV. NAV of course is historical cost based and we are 15 years into this project, with all the associated price inflation aspects. It's highly doubtful CNR could get this far for what we currently have on the balance sheet. In a nutshell we have two pretty meaningless indicators of what the outcome might be; Dec '23 NAV and the market price, the latter of course showing dramatic moves on the whim of tiny volumes.
So, we have a Nicaraguan stand-off. Mellon has dug his heels in, and the Chinese want to get away with a steal. I've tried to rationalise the outcome via average price of assets in, and on, the ground, but the reality is that we are in an auction situation. The Chinese are playing for time, probably thinking that Mellon will eventually buckle. If both bidders are in fact Chinese it's pretty reasonable to assume the dead hand of the state directing bid strategy for both. Pin a bid at a low threshold, and show some faux competition from the other bidder adding a few more points. Maybe; maybe not. It's impossible for me to say. Are we in the midst of a Game Theory situation? Again, there are no facts to work with, so it's impossible to speculate. Is there effectively just one bidder, the Chinese state? In other words, to paraphrase a political nutter, are they both two cheeks of the same ar.e?
I haven't been as wrong in my optimism for about 15 years. In February 2023 I thought there was an outside chance of a deal by the end of March 2023. Never in my wildest pessimism would I have thought that a deal announcement by the end of March 2024 would look like optimism. I can't actually recall any sales process I've watched, or been involved in, taking this long. Even £10bn M&A has been done and dusted within a year.
Now, after 15 years, if I'm thinking that it's no surprise that people with a shorter investment timeline are bailing. It doesn't mean the assets are worth any less, nor will it likely affect the ultimate outcome. But it certainly explains the boredom/frustration of pretty much everyone. Perhaps JM is just a world class negotiator, but for me I really think it's time to close. I long ago accepted that 100p+ was a developer based pipedream, but really, anything less than 50 -60p really would signify failure. A failure to even achieve the sort of average prices achieved by dozens of juniors over a multi-year period. But then again shi. happens.