Member Info for dflynch

Different Tiger - see earlier warnings.

Note Important Message from Financial Conduct Authority regarding posting false or misleading information!

The CastlefordTiger posting on this website is not the more respected CastlefordTiger posting on other sites.
His attempt to impersonate the respected poster on other sites is really a ploy to manipulate the share price by spreading false information. Most people are aware that these boards attract some very strange fellows but as far as I am aware the impersonation of another poster is usually rare. Check out the other websites and you will note the truth of what has been said here.
Best policy is to ignore the futile attempt - it will soon be his bedtime! And if he continues in his naughty ways then Santa Claus will not be visiting!

An example of an attempt to manipulate the market?

From another website.

Please note
Castleford Tiger THE REAL ONE has unfortunatley got a copy cat poster who to be frank is spreading missinformation and false news. note the gap after CASTLE

If you could send an e mail to 'abuse!

clearly this person has an issue but i am a big boy.

Thanks in advance

tiger

Seems that the same tactic as used to acquire CRAW might be in play - the beauty of AIM. Whatever happened to the investing integrity of London markets - pactum dictum!

STT1’s could possibly be better employed by TM on her current version of Project FEAR / HYSTERIA. Certain talents are required to convince the proletariat to accept the “only available” agreement and STT certainly has a penchant for nugatory effort and lost causes, might even be rewarded; with an MBE for services rendered!

Or ASX need to be realistic!

Research the history, read the notice of AGM, vote on the resolutions if, like me, you are not happy with continuing subsidising the "hi-life" of certain individuals!

General Motors (GM) has developed a new 'ZH2' hydrogen fuel cell-powered electric truck, with a next-generation engine and a Chevrolet Silverado chassis.
The original ZH2 was based on a Chevrolet Colorado truck that had its front and rear changed to improve off-road mobility and host the power-generation and cooling systems. That fuel cell technology dated to 2007. The Colorado ZH2 was trialled by the US army's Tank Automotive Research Development and Engineering Centre (TARDEC) over the past two years to demonstrate that hydrogen fuel cell technology in ground vehicles would be stable enough for possible military use.
The truck's hydrogen fuel storage tank was shot with 7.62 mm standard, incendiary, and armour-piercing rounds. It was penetrated with a rocket-propelled grenade round but did not explode, GM officials said after the tests, because hydrogen explosions are difficult to sustain and hence relatively safe. The ZH2 is capable of outputting 25kW of continuous power and showed potential for users to capture the excess water that is a by-product of the fuel cell's output. The Silverado ZH2 is now also to be tested by TARDEC, Charlie Freese, Executive Director of GM's Global Fuel Cell Business, said.”The Silverado ZH2 can output up to 100kW of power and host much heavier payloads, Freese said. The newer fuel cell technology and platform enable GM to keep all the systems under or within the vehicle's cab, and within its chassis, unlike the first-generation Colorado ZH2, the rear of the platform is open to be used as a flatbed space, or configured like a typical pickup truck.

CAREFUL what you write / say about so called "planted voters".

Failure to attend the AGM and vote, failure to understand and appreciate procedure and Director's tactics at meetings would not be an adequate defence in any legal action taken against comments of this nature. - Just a friendly warning!

If you wish to do something mor constructive you should consider organising shareholders and requisitioning an EGM to resolve issues of concern.

You will receive news on the permits before you see any video of the AGM 2018! There was no videoing of the AGM........and there is no news on the permits even though time is clearly against us ( "Principal risks and uncertainties in the Annual report refers)!

A point made by a shareholder at the AGM was the commitment of the Board in using their money to buy shares in the company. You invest your money in a company by buying shares - uncertain that you will receive a financial return of an increase in capital or payment of dividends - it is a gamble which sometimes pays off. If you are a director you will receive remuneration. As long as this remuneration is greater than the purchase cost (if any) of shares bought to demonstrate “your faith in the company” then you will not be gambling as you have certainty of a financial return. If you are awarded options then even better – you still aren’t gambling as you don’t have to place your bet until after you have the result! The beauty of a non-gambling directorship is that you are unlikely to receive back from the company less that you put in! But the same cannot be true for the ordinary shareholders who are gambling and are reliant upon the Non-executive directors on the Board to protect their interests. Non-executive directors should be held to account by shareholders and if they are not doing their jobs satisfactorily then shareholders – in concert – have the power to remove them. There were insufficient voting shareholders at this AGM to vote off the NED’s given that the Board – not surprisingly – wanted them to be re-elected. So rather that Vote by post if you feel strongly about any matter you should attend the meeting. If you can’t; appoint a proxy to attend and show their hand on your behalf.

At an AGM resolutions can be passed by a show of hands (one vote per shareholder in attendance) or by a poll (one vote per share for each shareholder voting – either by attendance at the meeting or via a postal vote / instruction to nominee). It then becomes a matter of Tactics for the Board to get difficult / controversial resolutions passed – particularly in smaller companies. If there is strong opposition to a resolution, say indicated by postal votes received prior to the meeting, but a few shareholders present at the AGM, then it is better for the Chairman to gamble and vote on the resolutions by a show of hands - reliant upon a large number of opposing shareholders not being present at the meeting! Of all the resolutions voted upon the Board (4 VOTES) voted to support all the resolutions. There were definitely votes against the resolutions regarding re-election of Directors but the Board had a greater show of hands than those who opposed the resolution and therefore the resolution was passed – but not unanimously (and that’s how it is recorded by the Chairman in the Company’s books – there will be no record of how many or who’s hand was raised to support or oppose the resolution or the numbers abstaining.) With regard to Resolution 6 the initial vote was equal at 4 FOR and 4 AGAINST which caused some consternation on the top table as to what to do. However a shareholder who had abstained changed their mind and on a re-count the vote was 4 FOR and 5 AGAINST. Consequently this is recorded as a resolution which was not passed – and is reflected thus in the RNS.

More that 3 shareholders at AGM Voting conducted on a show of hands. Special resolution 6. Voting 4 FOR 5 AGAINST Resolution FAILED Shareholders really should attend AGM's

More than 3 shareholders at the AGM Voting done on a show of hands. Resolution 6 defeated 4 For 5 Against! You should attend the AGM's in person.

Yes!

Have a look at the % shareholdings for PPS Proton Power Systems. You will see that certain entities have a shareholding greater than 30% but the company remains trading on the AIM market. There are other examples.

This should be a world-beating product that’s why I invested in the company, an investment which is proving to be a bad one with 60% loss at present! I need to replace wooden sash windows and glazed balcony doors with new double glazed units to meet conservation area requirements. My enquiries of suppliers indicate that the majority of them have never heard of Accoya relying on engineered redwoods as hardwood substitutes. Those that are aware of it seem to be of the opinion that it is not cost-effective to use given the requirement to use stainless steel fixtures and fittings in construction of Accoya based products. One or two of the smaller firms have been very enthusiastic about the product but have difficulty in persuading customers to specify Accoya when making a purchase – again cost as well as availability seems to be the barrier. I feel that the company needs to additionally focus on sales to smaller organisations which are in the business of supplying bespoke timber products to the domestic and small business market. From little customers big customers grow and footslogging salesmen meeting small timber product businesses is one of the avenues open to increasing awareness and sales of Accoya in the UK. My last point is that I have never seen the product on display in Wickes, B&Q, Homebase, Travis Perkins, Builders Depot, or Selco Builders Warehouse! These are the outlets at which smaller builders, D-I-Y and the general public come to make timber purchases but Accoya never features! Come on Mr Clegg you and your fellow Directors, with their excellent connections with the UK timber Industry, need to extractum digitum and earn your salaries and fees.

I was expecting an upsurge in interest in Byotrol by Cruise Lines given its ability to reduce the risk of transmitting the Norovirus. Has your local Boots still got stocks? This is from the Daily Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/columnists/gillcharlton/9012608/Travel-advice-cancelled-flights-quick-stops-in-Brussels-and-walking-in-the-Faroes.html Norovirus is a risk at many hotels and can spread quickly. Thomson, the company through which you have booked, says that it sent an independent health and safety consultant to inspect Hotel Los Gigantes last autumn. He concluded that the hotel was not the source of any infection; in other words, it had been brought in from outside. In December there were only two reports of sickness at the hotel. Having read the reviews myself, I see that many guests do not use the hand sanitisers at the entrance to the restaurant. This is irresponsible and the hotel should have a member of staff insisting on their use. Norovirus is contracted by touching surfaces such as stair rails, lift buttons and salad servers which have been infected by a previous user. Another common way to catch the virus is to shake hands with someone who has recently coughed into their hand. The best way to avoid catching norovirus is to be scrupulous about hand hygiene. Wash your hands for at least 10 seconds in soap and warm water before eating anything. Steer clear of open buffets or take food from the back of the dish. Most importantly, buy a bottle of Boots' Anti-Viral Hand Foam, which is alcohol-free and manufactured by Byotrol. When the Holland America cruise line introduced a trial of this hand sanitiser on its ships, it found that norovirus all but disappeared. It works much more effectively than traditional sanitisers because, as well as killing germs on your hands, it gives ongoing protection against 99.9 per cent of viruses and harmful bacteria for up to six hours.

You are still able to refuse the offer. The meeting on the 30th is the AGM and not regarding the offer, although this will be discussed. The documents are in the process of being sent out. Contact your broker on Tuesday and tell them that you reject the offer.

I am not an investor in this company but what a brilliant and effective way of stealing a company off the owners. I take my hat of to them. As soon as they prove the tactic is successful you will see a lot more examples of this financial robbery taking place, particularly within the AIM market.. I could list several companies which could currently be subject to this underhand tactic. Success in stealing them will result in the collapse of the AIM market IMHO. Who would invest any thing in an unregulated market with such a high risk of being "mugged and robbed". I wonder if the Business Secretary condones such a move as beneficial to future private investment in emergent British companies?

The AGM takes place on the 30th of August in London. See the RNS for details. I will be attending the meeting to support the concerted action of shareholders who recognise that conspiring large shareholders are planning to acquire minority shareholders shares for less than their true value! This is a prime opportunity to let the BoD (particularly the independent non-executive directors) know that the Takeover is not in the best interests of all shareholders and that they should reject the offer until such time that the true future value of the company can be established. Small shareholders are not necessarily against a Takeover that reflects the true value of ENK.