Member Info for deepjoy

I don't subscribe to Code theories BUT ive never seen anything like this before …… weird. Level 2 shows two MMs buy side and one sell side atm...whatever that means for the SP?

D14mond... try logging in on a different ID today , you have four to choose from LOL....

the irony is the more I read your drivel the more I want to buy AS, no one is that determined to slag off a share there are not invested in without an agenda and yours and your associates is a pretty clear one to see. So, if you are genuine why not save any further comment until April / May ...oh yea you can't can you as you have a short term Agenda LOL... good luck with everything :)

I never heard of this share and came across it by accident really.. suffice to say, I did some research and saw the potential to get in at this point - i.e today :) . It is a hidden gem this one but I doubt it will be hidden for long. The numbers will do the talking soon one way of another next week...GLA

yes we should wait till June ...which is called investing in a company with excellent growth potential and riding the waves... spouting technical details from report I have read doesn't impress me and people should be mature enough to make their own minds up after doing research themselves.. So please do me a favour and stop re-spouting the same old same old time and again it is boring... I'll await the updates and reports and in the meantime ignore the repeat performances by the likes of you and your crew..... thank you

ERV1 - actually I think he first went in around 23p from the posting history... and secondly I ask myself why does someone like you, who is not invested post over 100 messages on the board? Of course you are going to claim that you are trying to save investors their hard earned money BUT I seriously doubt that …..insofar as your posting history suggests a preoccupation with this one share. Tell me are you an ex-employee and got sacked for using the computer in works time for personal use or are you and the rest of the group working for a rival firm?

I would love you to set out your rationale clearly so we can all judge for ourselves how public spirited you are?

Thank you
DJ

What the de-rampers seem to fail to acknowledge is the changes that have taken place to the company model. Firstly they moved sales team in house. Yes in the short term the move pushed up costs, as per their last set of results but the sales team have sold more and their cost per acquisition has gone down, plus they’ve dropped legacy wholesale contracts below a certain margin. So costs have come down and sales have gone up and margins have improved.

So, harking on about the past doesn't shape the future. I'm in and staying that way..

regards to all

DJ

That is complete BS and I don’t think for one minute you have opened a short, perhaps you meant a spread bet .... For the record the company fundamentals are good and anyone who understood accounts would know that .. I wrote an email setting out my frustrations to the company and, in fairness the chairman himself responded within hours ... I think it is fair to say that I have urged the company to provide interviews/ communication to the market to explain why the focus has been taken from overseas and I think they will ... I haven’t sold nor will I but I was disappointed to say the least ...

to be frank they should run a course in PR and sign themselves up to it …. no indication of a strategic review, narrative results out last week which contained no reference and then complete 180 degree turn this week... Not at all Happy and the SP is tanking sadly …..amateurish examples from a BOD...

Nope, what he is saying is that, unlike 83% of people who lose money trading, he is an investor with a clear investment timeline irrespective of the short term movements....like a few of us here tbh…

No worries, low volume, inpatient people...… long term its a winner and Joe, BB and Auct all know it. See ya next week guys.....Regard to all as always DJ

now we may start to gain some traction with this share … bye bye JP morgan

Hi beebopalula,,, Sorry for the delay in response. Yes the company raised 1.8m at IPO in August but we have yet to receive any real indication of cashburn in the development phase. We do know that the margins are tight on revenue given that they have just reported 200 bookings for which they receive very little at this stage. I also refer to the below from the recent RNS on strategy update:

"Depending on the outcomes of the Asian business strategic review, BigDish may require substantially less capital for growth than previously anticipated, which the Directors believe will benefit shareholder value."

It would be logical to assume that we can expect a placing at some stage irrespective of any proposed sale given the above disclosure. To be fair i really like the business model and it is a market disruptor for sure so the SP is largely irrelevant in the short term but the higher the SP of course the better for fund raise.

Just my opinion of course. Regards DJ

I agree monty… the cash issue is currently the elephant in the room … they will need funds soon but how and when they get them is the issue... long term its a winner either way in my view....

on the plus side JK ..just added a few below mid :)

I am not complaining got more at day low by accident and now averaging 27.6p well happy with that as despite the nah sayers this has good potential...

I agree and also the 4yr construction timeline

higher highs and lower lows for the past month.... I remain happy with this share and any positive news now will push this to a new range. just checking in to see how my largest holding is doing GLA :)

wiltshireman... I concur, the late reporting of trades says it all for me..

….upon us. The company tweeted this morning on that very point and although stating it was too early to judge, I am convinced my entry this month was a wise move. Nice to see the SP has remained steady so long term hold and see for me .. keeping the faith my research is sound with this gem … GLA

Not reallly ... the issue of additional capital funding remains unresolved to date