Member Info for Dee12345

I say let's debate that over a video chat.

What do you think, PuzzleTree?

Dear Puzzle/Bob whoever you are.

I've challenged Border Bob to a video debate.

He cowers.

I now challenge you to a video debate.

I'm sure you will cower, too.

Only trolls feel the need to hide behind pseudonyms under the guise of making valid points.

I'm ready when either of you are. Yet neither of you are willing to engage in an open discussion.

@BurgerBob

Nobody here wants you... Yet here you are.

We've been responded to by The Department for International Trade.

email saveBCN@protonmail.com - I'll respond with the relevant email to contact.

We've also emailed Kwarteng, Truss and IDS. Julian Lewis is a good one to write a paper letter to.

Mass shareholder campaigns rely on momentum - This is an illusionary statement.

This is an attempt to temper the momentum we have built. A failed attempt.

It's commitment that makes this campaign.

Many of us remain committed, and as holders of mining shares, we know all about boredom and commitment.

The truth is, this delay allows us to expand upon our campaign. We never had the time to run like for like DCF analyses on competitors. We do now.

We never had the time to finish our presentation and fully elaborate upon our argument. We do now.

We never had the time to work out a share buying strategy. We do now.

We never had the time to recruit more shareholders. We do now.

We never had the time to compare resource size/development to Market Cap across the industry. We do now.

We never had the time to ramp up our lobbying with other potentially interested parties. We do now.

We never had the time to cement relations with friendly stakeholders. We do now.

We never had the time to pull off a couple of more tricks we had up our sleeve. We do now.

We have planned for an offer, an extension, a lack of offer, an improved offer, and Ganfeng throwing their toys out the pram. This doesn't help BCN's cause, it helps OURS.

We have no reason to panic, nor worry. If this is their move, then the Board are weaker than we think.

We know what this is worth. And we will let the world know, too.

Pick up a copy of The Telegraph, tomorrow.

@burgerBob

They have no time to comment, when we're sending them 100 emails at a time.

Agreed.

They need Sonora. We need their expertise.

It's a win/win scenario, which makes selling out all the more reprehensible.

Anytime Bampster!

We have plans in place ready to step this up, and apply pressure on key areas if necessary.

If an offer comes? We've prepared accordingly.

If a higher offer comes? We've prepared accordingly.

If there's an extension? We've prepared accordingly.

No offer? We've prepared accordingly.

A lot of us have entrenched ourselves deep into this, and are under no illusions as to how difficult it can become.

Eye on the Prize. Only together, can we achieve the impossible.

100% agreed.

We will maintain professionalism at all costs. We're not calling for the board's heads - We're calling for them to do their jobs, to the best of their ability.

It really isn't something we should have to ask for in the first place, to be honest.

Our campaign guys, not just mine.

It's also to ensure if something like this is attempted again, then at the very least, board members will think twice.

In the meantime, we'll keep plugging relentlessly.

Thanks to all of us tbh - The email campaign has really propelled this.

It's nowhere near over yet, though. Not by a long shot.

Please, enlighten me as to how Ganfeng owning 44% of Zinnwald Lithium is beneficial to us?

Are you in this for production? Or do you WANT a quick sale?

I'm in both BCN and ZWND for PRODUCTION - Not to see someone take over whilst PI's receive none of the pie.

What is it you think we're fighting against, here?

BCN own 44% of ZWND.

If this takeover goes through, Ganfeng own 44% of ZWND.

It's really not that difficult

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/markets/article-9641119/Backlash-sale-lithium-Chinese-predator.html

Indeed,

A takeover will affect both ZWND and KDNC.

However, not many in either seem to understand that.

If you think this is good for "ZNWD", enjoy.

Keep your head buried in the sand.

Correct.

Just 44%.

It seems a lot here believe that a Ganfeng takeover of BCN will help ZINN.

It won't.

Once Ganfeng acquire Sonora, it can be scaled up to 100,000 Tonnes a year (Secker is on record saying so).

They then don't need Zinnwald. Coupled with their JV with Lithium Americas, and their interest in Mariana Lithium, what need do they have for ZINN?

This will simply become an optionality play. They will likely (IMO) sit on it. I mean, it's not like it's in their interest to see more supply on the market?

One thing Ganfeng have shown, is they do not really like to share. And they certainly won't be sharing a producing Zinnwald - And that's assuming it doesn't get stuck in development hell for the next 5 years.

You can argue I'm biased as a BCN holder, but I genuinely believe this.

Disclaimer: Heavy position in BCN, Moderate Position in ZINN

We were in The Telegraph again.

We will be in another National Newspaper tomorrow.

If you hold shares in this, and you're opposed to this takeover then you MUST get involved with our campaign.

Email: SaveBCN@protonmail.com

We now hold over 25 Million Shares. Over 400 of us, and many have gotten involved in our email campaign.

Soon we will release our presentation and make our case against stopping this.

If you're against this, you can't complain if you're not getting involved.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/05/31/small-investors-battle-chinas-bid-london-listed-lithium-miner/

Uncleal - Can you put him in touch with us?

SaveBCN@protonmail.com