Member Info for Daytradenovice

I think the title of this rampy thread is the more "silly" one.

Afterall this has minus ten bagged practically this last two years and simple continues treading water going nowhere at all, despite the 'interest' of Michael Murray and Mr 3% only Umar.

The rest of the 'informed' lot maintaining radio silence and not inspiring confidence at all.

Might be worth waking up, its daytime now and the suns out.

Yea he was Iparsnip.

Lasted just as long as Shornryder.

Wonder what ID is the next try to circumvent his obvious permament ban.

No worries at all PDS, not a problem

Coasty, you couldnt teach a fish to swim mate, give it a rest eh.

Pedro,

Cant take any of the credit for Shorns prompt removal, but i did report him to Lse and mentioned that it was tradey in a new guise and could they do a check lol - departed very shortly afterwards lol. So clearly he's trying to circumvent his permament ban, will continue to keep the eyes open for him, he's so easy to spot with his righteous tone.

Well done on removing todays reincarnation of his, he's not one for giving up an argument but he's truly had his wings clipped and needs ro stay as bad history.

I said nothing of the sort PDS.

I NEVER stated that 5630 "people applied to join the scheme" at all. do stop making things up and learn to read properly.

I posted "Last figures i saw was 2022, sjowing 5630 employees across the group"

So to make it simple for you and allow you to put your spade down.

I stated that in 2022 ( the last figures i saw) showed 5630 employees across the group.

I then stated that only 440 joined the latest scheme, as per rns, so less than 10%, as im sure even you can calculate.

So, if less than 10% of staff take up a 'no risk' scheme, then that doesnt show much confidence, does it?

PDS, i have back checked your posted information (shame the two clowns who recommended it didnt bother) and it would appear you are referring to informstion from the LAST saye rns, assumedly in error.

With modern technology there really isnt an excuse for getting such things wrong, is there.

I accept your apology in advance

"You can put the whole lot into one scheme @£250/month. or any figure you wish downwards to £5/month and spread over any number of years -until you hit the £250 maximum."

My bad, its actuslly now £500/month maxim7m

Indeed Blackfox, it would be worth a punt at least as an employee at such a low level of confident of the future.

Either way its a 'no risk' oppertunity as under the SAYE rules you are always entitled to your money back at the end of the SAYE period you choose, in full, should the share price fall. So in short you cannot lose a penny of your money.

Thats why im surprised only 440 people took up the oppertunity in the current RNS to which i refer.

You are indeed correct PdS, so please tell me where in the RNS issued today your figures come from?

Because the RNS states as below, as i posted.

"A total of 440 employees elected to participate and, pursuant to these elections, a total of 12,968,971 options over Ordinary Shares were issued on 3 October 2023 equating to 1.02% of the current issued share capital."

And no Coasty you are, as usual,wrong. HMRC rules permit staff to save £250/month maximum into SAYE schemes.

You can put the whole lot into one scheme @£250/month. or any figure you wish downwards to £5/month and spread over any number of years -until you hit the £250 maximum.

Surprised only 440 staff members took up the discounted share option scheme @ 25p

Last figures i saw was 2022, sjowing 5630 employees across the group so well less than 10% seem confident in the future.

Scary

I can count past 50k though eh coasty.

You seem to have trouble with that number, like most of the rest.

£6.50 anybody

Thought not

Blimey, correcting rns. seems somebody cant add up properly, associated with Boo im not so surprised - on the plus side - at least the new figure is up and not down.

Spidey

Shorns a great name . . . . quite a famous cartoon animal goes by the name, plenty of sheep on here bleating away lol

Just replied in kind, with a bit more humour though Wolf.

Been trickling down for a while hasnt it, old Glenda finally sucumming to the same unwanted trajectory.

Come on old girl, pull your socks back up!

He was still in full abusive flow right until the last post he made. He most certainly didnt 'capitulate', just not his MO at all, it was always full on attack back mode. Every single time.

He'll be back, and probably a bit more subtle in the future, what do you think Shorn?

Is that the new ID then tradey lol.

Surprise surprise a new account the same day he was booted.

Another baseless guess there.

He was booted off with no doubt. Its usual lse practice to remove the account exactly as happened when someones kicked out, plenty of examples to see.

There is no way on earth the antagonistic one would have left voluntarily, no way at all.

Tradey has been removed and gone completely at last, subject to reincarnation as something else ( i liked the earlier suggestion from somebody else of trading4bad) no doubt lol.

Pedros account is still clearly live and quite rightly he wasnt banned.

See Michael spending a few more pennies on a tiddly 10% top up has got the dreamers all fluffy again.

Doesnt seem to want to pay anymore than the magic 30 does he.

Maybe he'll sell the lot when Coastys £6.50 dream comes true