Member Info for Daytradenovice

Yes see you've been banging on about hotel chocolate across several other boards as well.

If you see similarities here, then im afraid you are clearly all alone in that ambitious daydream.

No flip flopping from me though so do please try and be accurate in your rather false accusations. ive been bear on this all the way.

This aint going nowhere, despite your rampy nonsense, somcome back down to planet earth for once eh!

Very happy for you happy, hopefully things will pan out as you guess but do please be a little more realistic in the short term.

Only the other week when the sp was 35p you were predicting (yet again) a breakout - the sp declined to 33p instead. Thats the real reality.

I dont think, other than yourself, anybody here expects this to be anywhere near £1 by New Year. Its a smidge over a month away and this sp is as static as a rock concreted to an anchor, its going exactly nowhere, is it?

Deluded belief, as warm and fuzzy as it may seem, isnt going to provide a three fold multiple in such a time period. Santa is not that generous.

Played a fairly good tune so far here level, plenty of bum notes played continuously by plenty of others. Some like yourself need a bit of a tune up, maybe a whole new instrument, current ones very battered and tarnished, still. Only good for the pawnshop.

Not sure who's 'will will' and 'will daytrade'

Whats happened to the overjoyed dreamer who was banging this drum recently?

Gone very quiet, thankfully.

Maybe a new 'collab' with Nella from the 'celeb' jungle, she's doing a cracking job of wrecking her youtuba 'brand'. BOO loves a top class influencer.

Differing opinions of all flavours are healthy, stimulates debate thoughts etc etc.

The clear omission to me however is that time has moved on and a few other areas totally ignored. Just a few below.

Glen is cyclical in nature, its a commodities trader so par for that course, so it yo yos about with world optimism demand and growth prospects - no mention of that, and it partly explains why the sp rises and falls along with such sentiment. So what if it bounces around - its what you'd actually expect with such a business.

Lack of debt now, used to be loads and loads - comparing an apple and a pear isnt sensible. The company is a different beast now with a far better placed bottom line.

Income, Focus only on capital growth of sp. This is not a 'growth' share, which is clearly the focus of op's wishes, its historically been an income share. And a bloody good one at that.

Anyway, thats my opinion, sounds sensible to me, others more than welcomed to their opinions and press their own sell and buy buttons to suit their wishes.

Seems a French ecological minister trying to people off buying new clothes,

€154m scheme on offer to claim refunds off repairing old gear lol.

Targetted the wrong sellers unfortunately, so they say.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-67527490

I think i get it growup, you got burned here somehow, it happens in this game and having shareprices yo yo about isnt anything new for most listed companies. They all go up and down, and there are millions of examples where solid companies sp's take massive hits - why nit spend some time posting how bad they are? Heres a few starters for you, Vodaphone, BT, Lloy, PFC, Persimmon etc etc. There are many many, yet you just seem to concentrate on this one (which has recovered greatly in comparrason to my examples, so clearly isnt so bad and in need of such dedicated effort in pointing out).

Now you are entitled to your opinions, others are theirs, we all press the buy or sell button based on our own decisions. I hold Glen, quite a few, but less than i did before, thats my choice, you of course are free to make your own.

Look forward to your pointing out all the failings of VOD, BT.A, PFC, LLOY, PFC, PSN tc etc for non biased balance of course, assuming those didnt burn you also.

Hear what your saying Dr P, absolutlely agree theres no point flooding a market, esp when prices are down a tad. however not to long back we we're selling copper for top dollar - glen still kept the output reducing. Id have thought the best plan is to make hay while the sun shines as the saying goes, then cut back once the rate dropped.

The cost of operating the mines in the future is an interesting one, producing material in the future will incur higher costs with the increasing cost of capital, this will push up unit rates, and with finances stretched more generally around the world, that may well cause a double whammy in demand destruction, as peoples purses become emptyier and the unit production costs are higher.

There will be a careful balance that is likely the best solution, so again id have produced more while these headwinds didnt exist, rather than wait.

Sure Glen will have some sort of handle on it, far far mire clued up and aware than the average punter.

Yes its comical beyind measure isnt Spideystreet, and its always the same garbage from the same garbage producers. Some of them have more jam to deliver than a Robertsons warehouse, yet unfortunately they dont seem to possess a truck to do the job.

And i see the "whack job" fascinated clown, who has been wrong on this stock since day one, is yet again trotting out the 'multi id' rubbish again, he's like a scratched old 45.

And equally as upto date.

While on the subject, i think Glens major issue is it always reducing materials production outputs.

Every single set of figures for years now have been lower outputs than the prior report..

This will no doubt be having a holding back affect on the sp.

Selling less and less product (of all types) isnt a growing business, as ive said many mnay times before.

This, imho, is aglen achilles heel.

"1. Why is it some sort of problem for me to have a consistent perspective and come on this board very occasionally, when I see a fresh and serious problem consistent with that perspective - i.e. that NOTHING positive EVER causes the market to re-rate this share properly? It trades at a truly laughable earnings multiple - something like 3 x. "

I have no problem at all in you having an opinion or perspective on this or any other share, as indeed i have some myself. I do question ehy this os practically the only share you post on, and for the last three years your views are always extremely negative, almost as if there is an agenda s9mewhere.

Surely, when you were posting at 170's now seeing the sp in the 450 area is a positive thing?

"2. It is not a "very small retrace" since the Teck announcement, nor quite obviously is the share now in the mid 450s as you state. It is mid 440s and sliding again today. So it has dropped 5 of 6 days since last Thursday and is off now approaching 6% from the Thursday intra day high of circa 473.75. "

I beg to differ, and the sp is a touch under 450 right now, so not mid 450's and neither mid 440's either as you state. It is also up today and not "sliding again". Shares move up amd down all the time, maybe you could pop up when this rises again, as im sure it will given its usual practises, and state something positive for once. I dont recall you posting your negativity when it was north of 500 fairly recently.

"3. What is the disaster with it trading at 447 you ask?. Err that is the whole point of my having posted again. The disaster is a. that the share is 23% down for the year (it was down over 30% at the nadir) and b. the WHOLE point of my post is that what was announced last Wednesday should have been taken by the market as utterly value-transformational. It should have invoked a really serious unwinding of the YTD drop, especially with copper recovering as it has in recent weeks. "

I somewhat agree here, as do others who have posted regards the value of the suggested coal spinoff. One would think it should create a value increase in the stock value. Indeed i believe that it will, but markets are fical and dont see such things on occasion until much nearer the time. Take AAL and TGA. TGA was spun out for mere pennies. Then look what happened later. They absolutely skyrocketted. Did AAL do the wrong thing, you could say so yes, but if im left with a similar circumstance with regards Glens "tga" spunout shares then the value you say isnt there currently will surely be recognised in a similar manner.

"Agreed Volt we’ve had no decent news for over 15 months!"

Oh please do be consistent and stick with the trotted out narrative.

It wasnt five mins ago you and most of the rampers on here were lording up Umar the Sandmans buy in, and then Frasers buy in, amongst several other 'good news' items.

So its official now, Umar and Frasers are negative news lol

Still doing well, the sp then?

Lets be hearing the current crop of excuses/reasons.

I do yes Growup, although i do have some agreement since the Tech announcment has caused a (very) small retrace.

The trouble is you've been repeating only the same narrative for three years, its absolutley all that you post. Been doing it since shares were in the mid 100's, for some reason. Why is it a disaster to see the mid the mid 450's now? A 5% drop which seems to have stirred you back into action isnt unusual for Glen (nor lots of other shares) really.

We get it Growup, you dont like Glen much. Been saying the same for years and years.

Im sure Mclie will be along in a moment to explain how that will work in an aircraft.

Yeah yeah, of course you are.

Id be rather worried if a self claiming "chief engineering consultant" posted THREE TIMES that nitrogen was an aircraft fuel. Even a schoolkid can see that goolie.

Must be working for Ryanair if you've 'found room' in a 15 seater for an extra 9 seats.

Pull the other one fantasist

I clearly remember Johnbri posting that he's "an aircraft design consultant" who pre-covid "flew more than a million miles a year". He has also posted that he designs fuel tanks and is somehow involved in the conversion (according to his own posts) of a "15 seat aircraft to fly on hydrogen".

He then went on in another post to state THREE times that "planes can fly with nitrogen". Three times he posted that. Its all there in his post history.

Now, the trouble is, most sane people could understand, that unless he is a fulltime commercial pilot there is NO WAY he could fly "one million miles a year" and even if he was that would be a stretch.

There is of course NO 15 seat hydrogen powered aircraft under development, and nitrogen (his new fuel) is non combustable!!!!

Then of course there is the pool pictures, that he confirmed via email are of him, but now he denies.

Blokes a fantasist pure and simple, and from the tick ups it appears all of us know that already.

And what do you know jonny mclie - you use aircraft inflight magazines to pick your stocks. And you moan on that your down on thise same investments.

You dont have any BOo shares either, at least i do, so maybe go back to posting filth on advfn and iffy pictures of you in the communal pool.