Member Info for Daytradenovice

An 'averaging down' top up today on the continuing weakness.

just in case this gets took private at a fraction of the current holdings average.

In for a jumper in for a t shirt and all.

Risk 'another' £50k's worth. . . . . . maybe,

"No, I certainly am not Daytradenovice. Yet you keep claiming that I am. Truly bizzarre."

Could be worse Bon, you could allegedly live on the coast down south and like cold water bathing. Fancy being him !!!!!!!!! lol

Been some nice juicy high interest paying and totally safe bank accounts to dump money in of late level, suspect a lot of folk have sheltered wealth within those, rather than gamble on the markets. NS&I upto 6.2% at one point. Lovely. Just think what a few hundred thou could have made folks in one of those compared to here, for example.

So if, as the company says, as they would say of course, they dont need the extension of £75m RCF - why on earth are they paying fees to have it in the first place?

Why not pay it back and save those avoidable costs?

Afterall they are constantly banging the drum about cost reductions, and this ones an easy big win, isnt it.

As the numerous articles state, contrary to what the company would be expected to say to avoid financial panic, the lender declined to extend, and thats clearly the reality. Market seems to agree as well, with such big falls after the recent big rises pre news.

Seems somebodys wants their RevB money back. Will be interesting to see the claim fleshout, Boo Might have purchased a dud!

https://worldtimetodays.com/revolution-beauty-faces-a-preliminary-letter-from-chrysalis-after-its-share-price-collapsed/

Most interesting is the statement that "the lenders behind a £75m portion DECLINED to give Boohoo another year to pay it back".

Cant say that id blame them either given the performance this last couple of years.

Im sure the lender that declined to extend terms figures that they'd sooner be first in the queue to be paid back - rather than risk being last and scratching for crumbs.

Only £1500 down today then after that 1/2p drop, based on that "penny a £" post.

#boohootakenmeforaride

I think even Weatherspoons standards of customer exclude such an entry Crawshaw.

Better suited to a bus stop id imagine

Possibly correct IParsnip, ones certainly obvious, but just for the record and before accusations come flying in from the usual antagonists, im neither.

Started fairly well this morning, shame that it fizzled out and the downtrend is continued. Be interesting to hear Pipes reasoning and thoughts over the weekend.

Quite simple, an Attempt at bottom fishing Buffalo with a small punt on a v risky stock.

I picked an entry that was a little higher than the bottom as it happended.

Im more than happy to confirm it, not as embarrased as as some on here clearly are, afterall its far closer to the bottom than some of the flag wavers.

And at least i have the nads to be honest and transparent about it, unlike plenty.

Welcome to your opinion of course spk.

As i am mine

Does seem odd MrC id agree.

But then i dont suppose anything to do with kzg makes a lot of sense, given all the hype.

Latius75 & Almost

Thanks for the suggestions, I use an ipad - phone screen to little for my old eyes, so stuck with Safari.

Do have adblock+ on here but it seems to have periods where it doesn work at all then be pretty good for a while, so a bit hit and miss, maybe uninstal it and give it another go afterwards.

Just exposing your non factual conspiracy beliefs and wild assumption spk.

A good and fair point noggers, it would appear that people rate Sdry in a more positive way, after such news, hence a large increasein sp.

Unfortunately BoO carries a lot of, shall we call it, baggage, and seems to remain a bit of pariah as regards what investers require to make an investable case.

Michael Murray being the single exception, the company he controls being well known for buying stakes in poor businesses.

Even the founders dont think its worth buying BOO, except for Umar sandman, who bought a tiddly stake after selling out to the family for a far far greater amount of cash in the past.

In short, if the BOD and founders wont buy, why should anybody else be confident?

"One of my favourites was when be went on the rolls royce board at 60p and told people not to buy...

Apparently his family member was a big boi management at rolls royce and told him it was in big trouble.... "

Coasty, you are a blatant liar.

I have absolutely no family members in RR at all - your imagination and desire to cause trouble seems to have no bounds whatsoever. What a disgrace.

I do have a family member who does however sit on the BoD of a different listed company, i have posted that (without disclosing the business for obvious reason).

You like going back through my posts, so come on, post the FULL post where i supposedly said this regards RR.

You cant because it doesnt exist. And non of your 'selected edited highlights' eh!

Are we suggesting the BoO founders, or somebody else, may be interested in taking this private?

That would be great news for all those trapped in at higher levels. not.

Cant see it myself, but who knows realy.

He doesnt make any profits until they've fell by 90%, holds tight till then.

The 'profits' oddly seem to roll in afterwards.

"JeremyP didn't contact the BoD till early evening on the 1st, and you DTN state typical no response at circa 08.30 on the 2nd. What do you expect, instant response. You just have to put a negative spin on everything BH related. Gosh, I'am so glad I have a life."

Jeremy (cough) actually posted he "emailed the BOd earlier" He didnt specify when that was, so dont try to misrepresent it to be "early evening" as you did. Tell the truth.

You, me and everybody else excepting Jeremy (cough) only know he "emailed earlier". Which could be three seconds before his evening post, three days before his post, or three weeks before his post, or at any other time beforehand.

You have NO IDEA when it was so stop telling porkies wrapped up with your typical 'positive always' attempt to close down anothers view, sim0ly because 'you have a dream'.

Love it connexion.

The adverts are bloody annoying i fully agree, especially the pointless little video popping up permamently in the bottom corner. The Adverts do seem to beat quite a lot of the posts on here during the last couple of years for quality mind, even if they are clickbait.