Member Info for Daveavt

I suppose this is the issue. Not a question of whether something in an rns will be successful, but now the question of is it actually true, or will it actually happen. Track record on everything so far shows no. The future may be different, but you've all heard the saying 'don't cry wolf'..

What new bit is this, and when is it due to land?. I like facts, and you seem like a man with the facts, please do foretell us when and what to expect. And then also you need to ensure me that what is stated actually takes place, as seeing as everything the previous rns's never did, why this one would be any different. Go!

Well unfortunately your company has nothing new to report on, that was my point, so a re run will be fine, old classics are always the best John..

Oh I wasn't deramping, I was mentioning all the problems and backing them up with links. I can copy and paste them all together into a big post if you like, I'll do it tomorrow.

Well I wouldn't want to interrupt you lot on the thrill of commenting on every sale and price change as gaz predicted would I! I'll tune in tomorrow for Radio Ramp...

He/she/it

Going by his logic if it's a billion in the ground it would be worth 700k, so if it's got 2 billion in the ground it would be 1.4 million, 4 billion, 2.4, 8 billion 4.8million, and so on. Pittance for the resource, but let me go on to something he has completely missed. Let's say to excavate this whole site, costs half a billion, and the previous in ground estimate was half billion, then you wouldn't bother, and probably pay peanuts for the site. But now, the in ground resource is 1.5 billion, extraction cost is the same, but you have 1 billion profit...instead of none. All costs and figures above are hypothetical, but shows it turns a valueless cheap bit of land into a viable asset and the sale price would reflect that. It's no different to having a business that's doing 1 million turnover but costs of 999 thousand and worth 2 quid, and then doubling the turnover to 2 million, and still 999 thousand running costs. That doesn't make the company only worth 4 quid though does it...

And yet another post from Tony bashing the posters and not the posts.

Exactly, and a good selling point of the homes is you can tell the new owners there is 1.5 billion dollars of metals under their patios lol

Though ironically, 900 million minus 800 million, a crazy out of this world number quoted by wizard, is 100 million profit. And he thinks say ten million for something that could generate 100 million profit is silly. I'll tell you what, if I can make 100 million over ten years for only ten million cost, I'll find the money and do it.

Wizard, moans that people are throwing unjustified numbers, and then throws around a completely unjustified number of 800 million extraction costs. Wizard, show us how you got to 800 million please? Show your workings...

I know Quad, all that effort to make a mere $600k. My neighbour just sold a house he built this year on the land next to my house for more than that, maybe the chairman with all those billions of business deals should have listened to my neighbour, could have made more money, according to wizard lol All those extensive drill campaigns, time, money, assessments....they should have just put a couple of 3 bed semis on the site!

We all know wizard doesn't really think what she says, she's a knowing openly deramper. And evident that she has multiple accounts on here, because this profile of hers only comments on this share, all negative. 500 plus posts, I'd say more than any person on here. Not a peep on any other share. I have a feeling wentsland may rear his head too soon..

Agreed, we didn't buy either with a Jorc either..

Nom, You don't need to re assay, as indium is a by product of zinc processing. It's not directly in the ground. You mine the zinc, you process it, you extract the indium. Because we have high percentage zinc levels, is the reason we have high indium levels. The lower you get your smelting costs, the more profit to be made.

That sale was on Thursday, they may have sold it all by now.

Another £8 grand buy at 14.7, still cheap. Seems the available shares out there are helping. I dripped fed a few shares from my holding this morning.

Marine, it wasn't a limit share, I just punched in 5 grands worth of shares, it gave me a current price valid for ten seconds, clicked OK, job done.

Marine, I use share.com for my brokering.

Well I do wonder if free float can be an issue. I'm sure if I kept trying to buy a share and it kept going to NT I'd just think sod this and go elsewhere. For shares to go up, buys still need sales.