Member Info for Daveavt

He knew the price would fall, and sold. Now much lower, bought back in. Rinse and repeat.

John, it's 150k, 150 thousand pounds. It's not like he has invested any serious wedge, and as you just stated he sold and bought in lower. If he was confident the price would have gone up, he would have stayed in. In your own words he deRISKed.

Tony Tony, I know you like to ramp, I know you don't care about the company is actually doing anything, you only care if others think the company is doing anything, so you can get them in the net. That's why it doesn't matter to you about all of the dirt I have found, the fact the industry put a warning against buying shares with the company, you just want all the information to be put under the rug so you can ramp ramp ramp.

0.7 to 0.4 is an up trend is it? Turn your chart around...

Actually I did say 'waited'. So no, it wasn't disingenuous. He can accumulate at 0.45 and below on the current downtrend and in the new year. He could have accumulated a chunk of it this week alone.

A vote of confidence? He sold shares previously at a profit, and now has bought back in cheaper. Remember for the last two weeks you lot telling everyone what a bargain this share was and people should buy in? Well obviously he didn't agree with you. You're right about the volume, I meant more that I bet he wishes he could have accumulated, but volume and interest has dropped, for obvious reasons.

I bet he's miffed, he could have bought much lower today, or waited.

Unfortunately, as per all the other rns's, If you Google WOW, there is nothing on the web. Absolutely nothing, no websites, Facebook, social media nothing. No means of contacting this company, no premises. All there is is a companies house filing, based at a home address as an office, and what appears to be a husband and wife team and one other guy. Previous to this he was part of a company called pyxpayments.com , a provider of visa / mastercard merchant solutions, the usual run of the mill card processing options for businesses. The site is still running, ironically for a company offering secure solutions it's security certificate has run out and Google will warn you away from visiting the site, but the main reason for this is because it's been left to rot. The site has had no updates for two years, Facebook page has been closed down, other social media links no updates for two years, I would assume it's now a dead company. So yet again we have a company according to an rns with 'so much to offer' where it's previous inclination has died off, and the latest company doesn't seem to actually be 'active'. Also, according to companies house, and I quote 'The company was dormant during y/e 30.06.16.' - all of this was found via a 2 minute Google search. Also there is no vat number on file. I have just done a comprehensive vat number search, and no company with a name even close to their registered name comes up registered for vat. Yet according to the rns, revenues for this company in 2017 was a million dollars, yet there is no way of actively contacting this company, which has only been active since July from a previous dormant status, and not vat registered...

Tony, it's his warrants, he has to before they expire. And you don't know what price he paid, it's pre arranged, nothing to do with the current share price, but obviously not higher.

It seems like a lot of rns's are being thrown out without substance just to keep the powers at be happy and get warnings removed for the time being.

If backwards showed nothing but warnings, you're putting a lot of 'faith' in the future. And as I've shown countless times, things in CURRENT rns's aren't even happening or exist, and current 'buy outs' when we research that company, raises red flags too. What is this future you're looking to??

It was removed because they gave them a plan of action. But, again, that's just words. See the last link I posted below...

Even those analysts in that aptgajdtare basically saying 'they say lots of stuff, but still no evidence of anything has materialised, even when asked'

http://streetregister.com/2017/11/29/envoy-group-corp-otcmktsenvv-operational-updates-stall-stock-still-cruising/

You're missing the point of why it was placed in the first place. For exactly the reasons I've found through research.

And this one, check out the warnings and disclosure of assets and cash in the bank. https://oracledispatch.com/2017/08/08/envoy-group-corp-otcmkts-envv-searches-redemption/

A little digging and things become clearer. Obviously nothing to do with this share directly, but envoy/ black cactus. http://stocknewsunion.com/investors-run-from-envoy-group-corp-otcmktsenvv/6451/??

Yes blockchain may one day become as big and widely used as Sql as a database, but so what, because as with sql, it's not the database that makes a successful business, it's what it is applied to, and whether the company using it has to means to successfully market it. It makes no odds who is the first or an early adopter, as what people can do with software moves so fast. Databases like sql are the kinds of things behind mammoth sites such as Facebook, but also runs some kids online blog about his bottle cap collection.

And the link to the kyc programs on blackcactus site has been removed too, the one that was linked to in it's own rns.

You need to go through my old posts, none that software actually exists, or the websites have been abandoned, or as nothing like described. Backstagehd has been closed down, musicroo is one login page, blackcactusmusic.com is laughable, and all made with WIX free website builder.