Member Info for Daveavt

How am I bashing it. As you just said black cactus and milestone haven't even agreed a deal. How come you're allowed to say that, but when I do I get insults, belittling, 'talking rubbish' etc..

They may know something I don't, I may know something they don't. Ironically this share amount covers their current debts and failed placing shortfall almost exactly.

I was wrong about milestones turnover figures, when I said only 74 grand, that was 2016, this year it was only 22 grand.

I was just about to post that.

It doesn't matter what it was based on, it turned out to be a dud. They got it wrong.

I could say, milestone, not up at all since 2 weeks ago. That's true too. I still can't twist black cactuses figures to say anything different, it's been down consistently and up a bit today.

And no, as I said since black cactuses start, it spiked straight away to 0.60 odd and down consistently every day, a TREND. That's hardly the same as saying 'milestone up 20 percent this week. It could hit 0.01 and go back up to here but I'm sure you wouldn't be shouting 'multibagger!'

No, you're doing the argument from authority fallacy. They invested back then, and milestone turned out to be a dud. So they made a bad decision. If I had been around back then and studied the news releases, and see back then what I see now, I wouldn't have invested. So who would have been right? Me. The arguments stand on their own merits, not who is saying or acting on them.

I would say no? they haven't, as tr1s have to be issued for every 1 percent purchase of the company up or down. To accumulate this slowly as we can see by the low volume lately, if they were new to the game, we would have multiple tr1s. I don't think even 93 million shares have been sold in the last couple of weeks? I'd say from what we have seen, they had 4 percent, added 20 million shares, easy to do, single tr1 appears.

Doc, it's because I don't see a SINGLE fair comment to the facts, and yes they are facts I show from the company, from their words. So sorry, it's not merely a different view. It's blatant fingers in the ears and insults.

Who knows, you can look too you know. They have nearly 100 million shares, did you see that many bought this week as people are attributing the rise to? No.

Because it's a holding for 5 percent. You have to trigger tr1s for lower amounts first. It's not like the trades this week have been flying in. They would have triggered a tr1 initially for the lower threshold, then the next.

which goes back to my point about a value of a company and irrelevant share prices. When you have a company doing 74 grand turnover, and people own shares of a higher value than the company is even turning over in a year, it makes the whole aim thing a joke.

The price back then, as I made a point of earlier, was higher than now. Maybe they 'think' it's a bargain now.

They probably thought there was new potential the first time they invested.

Doc, they were previously invested. So in hindsight,they owned a decent chunk of this company before 'the new direction' and by milestones own admittance, everything they did failed and they made bad decisions and have abandoned everything in the past, and turnover has dropped to a measly 74 grand, so ergo, their previous investment was a 'bad decision'. Would you not agree?

Tony, I'll spell it out really simply for you. Let's say YOU want to start a company and develop some blockchain apps. Two companies come to you with their blockchain platforms that you can develop app on. One is an ex energy drink supplier, has no evidence of any platform, or app, staff, support team, can't show you anything, also wants 5 percent of anything you make and 30 percent of your company, the other one is the 100 year old multi billion pound IT behemoth, has a fully functioning block chain platform for you to use, been running for a years, worldwide known, all the support and tools you need, tech help available, and it's FREE OF CHARGE TO USE. Which one would you go with?

Tony, I think there is something wrong with you. How can you not grasp what I'm saying. Are you just being obtuse on purpose?

I'm pretty mean that I have to lead you down this merry path to the inevitable answer, and could come out and say it, but you lot are so obtuse it needs to be done...

Why are you getting excited that they like the investment. Tony likes it too, are you excited about that...