Member Info for Daveavt

Doc, so what if they like the investment?

When I ask you a question Tony, I'm not actually asking because I don't know, I'm asking for your ill thought out reply, which I've already got the reply to. So I'll ask it again 'why do you think them increasing their stake is a good thing? Once you answer, I'll reply...

Oh God Tony, you are a lost cause. You don't understand anything. Go and read what I wrote and don't come back until you can grasp a simple statement. Where have I said 'who are they' and where have I made any mention of 'buying out IBM'. Jesus Christ what you write is unfathomable...

You do realise, if someone is accumulating shares, there is still a cut off price they are gonna think 'OK we don't want to pay that much per share'. You don't honestly think it's just going to go up and up to infinity?

Well it might still rise, depends what the mms do with the spread and if they are still buying. But if not, it will most likely retrace.

No fundamentals changed, I just said that. Why can't people read? Didn't I explicitly just say 'companies are valued on fundamentals, aim share prices have no relevance to anything'???

Point in fact, isn't it ludicrous, for instance with this company, that there is more money held in shares, and traded some days, than the actual company turns over in a year lol. .....and that's the point. Why do actual business when you could make more money making rns's saying you're doing business and make money from trading shares.

Doc, all companies are 'valued' on fundamentals lol, aim share prices have no relevance to anything, hence why the price spiked on the mention of a completely pointless and misleading rns, and then went back down again. Thanks for proving my point.

It is up 20 percent, from the bottom. Posting 'milestone up this week' is ramping, because I sure didn't see you posting 'milestone is down 40 percent' last week. And hence the bias of people invested... and no it's different to black cactus, because it was continual trend, each day. Guess what, it's up today, and are you going to block me for a third time?

That's got nothing to do with the fundamentals of the company.

It doesn't really matter if they are. In hindsight, it's not like they made the right decision when they previously invested in this company.

Doc did, he was elated that it's up 20 percent this week, but does it mean anything' when it's 20 percent up from a big slump, and this company has higher share prices when it didn't even mention dabbling in blockchain. That is called 'ramping'.

Doc, if you read the rns's, blockchain was mentioned a long time before the spike. Previous to this it's been higher constantly than now. That's why people do research...

Tony, I asked you lot on here why have they bought 5% and why you think it's a good thing. I already have my response to your predictable answer, I'm just waiting for one of you to say it. So, tell me, why are you getting excited about an existing investor increasing their share?

Doc, and what are you on about. What effect would IBMs blockchain have any effect on anything else. I don't think you lot have any idea what block chain is do you? Explain to me what you think blockchain is.

Tony, why can't you grasp simple statements? What do you not understand about my IBM comment. How is it really that hard to understand. I couldn't write it any simpler.

I've done all the failed msg projects and vapour ware, companies house investigations, turnover levels, viewed the code for all the websites, dns domain searches, webarchive analysis on old websites to see their content, same with black cactus and envoy, gone through old rnss to find old projects and their site links to find them redundant, went through envoy sec filings, black cactus filings, went through black cactus Australia information, wow companies house filings, previous companies of pyxpayments, people involved, found obsolete mirror websites containing defunct products you hadn't even heard about, the list goes on. what research have you done, other than buying shares in a company because it had blockchain in the title?

There you go Tony. https://www.ibm.com/blockchain/platform

Tony, re read my comment about IBM. You don't have to be in partnership with IBM, that's my point. They have a free blockchain platform ready to go that anyone can use. You don't have to give away 30 percent of your business to use it. You don't even have to speak to IBM to use it. It's a service you can use and develop applications from straight from their website.

OK I'll attach the label 'desperate posters looking for an excuse' then. That OK?